Pages

Friday, 14 November 2008

I’ve got the feeling I’ve been had!

Hmmm — tonight, tonight, tonight!

What to say, about tonight?   I’ll admit that, as most of my close friends know, I’m something of a Doctor Who fan.   So, tonight being Children in Need night, having little else to do, I decided to stay in, to try and catch the much hyped preview of the upcoming Christmas 2008 episode.

And feel somewhat cheated.

The last Children in Need extravaganza featured a specially recorded scene, set in the minutes just after the TARDIS gets hit by the Titanic, and featured a special appearance from Peter Davison, reprising his role, as the Fifth Doctor.

Given the hoopla about this year’s extravaganza, I personally was expecting something along the same lines, and feel a bit let down and cheated that something similar wasn’t done this time around.

4 comments:

  1. I know what you mean but am not sure I agree. We both wanted more but we always do :). Last years Time Crash was excellent but it was a one off. This year they made it clear it was just a trailer. It does however raise a few issues. For instance, Morriseys Doctor doesn't appear to recognise himself! Does this mean he is an imposter? Or several regenerations removed? Or just pre-occupied with visiting Cybermen related anxieties? Secondly, have we seen the new Doctors assistant? What do you think? Do you think? Do you dress to the left? Am I running out of questions? Does your chewing gum lose it's flavour.... Yes, I'm running out of questions. I'll shut up :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. That was my first thought; – I’m also thinking along the same lines as you, that Morrissey’s character’s a phoney …

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well, I am sure it will be a cool episode, with just a sidelong glance at each other they displayed the potential for the bickering banter of previous multi-doctor episodes. And I hope they keep it all under wraps til xmas. I hate having my meandering speculations spoilt by hard facts :D

    ReplyDelete

I love it when people comment. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?

I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.

Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively adult. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.

Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.

If you can also leave you comments on today’s Teaser Video, that would be good.

Thank you.

*   I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.

†   Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable: as are Bluesky or Mastodon links. I also like seeing folks webpages.