Pages

Monday 24 August 2009

India … And Glorantha …

Hmmm …

Well, there’s a thing.

I managed to dig up a bit of an ol’ favourite that had been sitting on my shelves for some time.

I’ll admit, I was something of a rôle-playing-game buff, in my younger days.

One of those games was the rather yummy Chaosium produced RuneQuest.

Which, at the time, was rather special.

Dungeons and Dragons had paved the way for the hobby, but even it’s most die hard fans would admit that the game could be a bit clunky; rules sprouted at the drop of a die, and backgrounds proliferated like mushrooms in swamps.

RuneQuest went in a different direction.

For starters, the actual rules mechanics were a lot simpler; and came down to three different types of percentage-based roll.

And the background?

Whooh!

Dungeons and Dragons built up quite a few, relatively samey backgrounds; most being some sort of variation of Middle Earth: or Chivalric romance.

RuneQuest, by comparison, had Glorantha.

Originally invented by Greg Stafford in 1966, Glorantha was tied into “RuneQuest” on its original release, in 1978.

And was relatively influenced more by bronze age Greece, than by Middle-Earth.

Which, for me, made a very pleasant change to many of the games doing the rounds, at the time.

But the simple fact that there was a game with such a fresh background made it incredibly popular, and influential in its turn.

As far as I can remember, from my days in the business, almost every rpg, since, had to have its own background word.

That’s one hell of an achievement.

No comments:

Post a Comment

I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?

I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.

Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.

Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.

Thank you.

*   I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.

†   Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.