Pages

Thursday 11 March 2010

The Job Situation … Again …

Do you remember me writing, a day or so ago, about the situation with my job?

About how there was a possibility that I’d get taken aboard by the company that’s taking over what had been the Warley branch of Threshers?

You do?

Oh, Good …

Well, an old workmate — from way back in the day, when I’d worked at The Hutton — pointed out that I may have cause to complain about that.

Cheers, Aurora!

It was a damn good idea.

It’s just a shame that it didn’t work out …

Bless her, Aurora suggested that I might just be able to make a case of it, under something I’d not heard of, until then: what’s called the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employees) regulations. Designed — basically — to make sure that the staff at a place of work get to keep their jobs, if a business is sold on.

Like I say, a damn good idea …

And one that — five or ten years ago — I maybe wouldn’t have gone for.

These days?

These day’s, when I’m older, in a steady relationship, and putting up a fight to get or keep a job, it seems much more the thing.

But, unfortunately, according to the nice person I spoke to at the Brentwood branch of the Citizens Advise Bureau, there was an exception to the TUPE regulations that applied to the case of Threshers.

The TUPE regulation applied when a business was sold on as a going concern.

What happened to Threshers?

Was a case of the assets of a business — the Brentwood branch’s lease, in other words — being transferred.

NOT the business, itself.

TUPE, it seems, doesn’t apply …

Now, I’d lying if I told you I didn’t have my hopes up, about this.

I would.

But I did.

The fact it didn’t come to anything?

Doesn’t surprise me.

But is a disappointment.

Definitely.

No comments:

Post a Comment

I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?

I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.

Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.

Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.

Thank you.

*   I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.

†   Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.