Dear Sir,
I’ve got to admit, I read your article about Rethink Reprographic’s loss of funding with a great deal of sadness.
I’ve met plenty of people, over the years, who’ve been help by it and organisations like it. Both to get back into society, and as customers who need its printing services.
Now I know that groups like Rethink, along with
NACRO, who do similar work in rehabilitating former prisoners, as well as the club for the visually impaired that your paper mentioned, all do fantastic work with service users and with those — like Rethink Reprographic’s customers — who have to deal with them.
Hearing about this …
Especially given that those of us with mental health issues, criminal records or disabilities, find it hard enough to deal with the employment market, when even Brentwood Council is letting staff — temporary or otherwise — go.
Well …
Rethink — and charities like it — losing vital funding is understandable, under the general atmosphere of cuts.
But is also a tragedy.
And a criminal loss of funds.
Pages
Thursday, 22 July 2010
Emails, The Library and … … STUFFFFFFF … !!
1 comment:
I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?
I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.
Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.
Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.
Thank you.
* I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.
† Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.
This is bad news about Rethink. I was in there a few weeks ago and they said Mr Pickles had visited and been impressed, so there were hopes the funding would not be cut.
ReplyDeleteGovernments are always complaining that people should find work, but it is extremely difficult when there are no services to help ill people get well enough to work.
Popular press like the Mail stirs up unrighteous anger in tax payers who conclude that anyone without a job for whatever reason must be a slacker, and then these people and papers say we get too much in benefits. I'd like to see them try to live on basic JSA or Incap for any length of time.
These people also think that anyone with mental illness must be a maniac, despite 1 in 4 people suffering from mental illness, and only journalists and Labour politicians actually are maniacs. And perhaps also the odd tyrant...
The papers also stir up hatred towards criminals regardless of circumstance. If someone has done the time and reformed he should be able to move on. I gave a certain person the benefit of the doubt, and I was not disappointed. People can and do change, and we should take them as we find them rather than judging them on past actions done for misunderstood reasons.
It is, of course, the fault of Labour that the country is in a mess. They wasted £billions with their incompetence and their obvious desire to ruin the country.
In 5 years perhaps the country's finances will be better, but with so many cuts in care and benefits will we survive to see it?