Pages

Wednesday 6 July 2011

The Gazette and the Town Hall.

You know, it’s been a while since I’ve written to the local newspaper, the Brentwood Gazette, for a while.

But — in last week’s edition, and I’m blowed if I can find it on the Gazette’s site — they ran a stiry about how Councillor Louise McKinley, the conservative party leader on Brentwood Council, and Barry Fagg, the former planning officer for the Council, had had secret meetings with representatives of the supermarket chain, Waitrose.

About selling off parts of the Town hall, to be turned into a branch of the store.

Well …

As you can appreciate, I shot off a letter to the Gazette, which has just got itself published … !

Here’s what I wrote.
I’ve got to admit, I read the article in this week’s Gazette — about how Councillor McKinley and former planning chief, Barry Fagg are having meetings with representatives of Waitrose — with a certain amount of shock.

Shock. But no real surprise.

Because ever since I read of how the Conservatives forced through their options for full or partial demolition of the town hall, I’ve personally felt that the Conservatives are becoming less representative of the people of this town: especially when you consider that this is an option the conservatives didn’t put forward in the consultation they’ve put forward.

Or in the original planning meeting.

I’ll be honest, here, if I may.

And state a personal believe.

I think that we here in Brentwood are going to be ignored by the Conservatives: despite many of my fellow residents voting for them.

To put it bluntly? In dealing with Waitrose, and in doing so in secret?

The Conservatives are stitching up this town up.

Good and proper!
Nice to be able to say I’ve got it published … !

But on top of that … ?

On top of that … ?

This little piece got brought to my attention, by one of my neighbours.

It looks like Brentwood Council’s staying where it is … for now …

No comments:

Post a Comment

I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?

I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.

Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.

Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.

Thank you.

*   I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.

†   Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.