Pages

Sunday 8 January 2012

Dr Who Episode 10: The Girl Who Waited

(Originally posted on Nik Nak and Grub’s Who Peculiar on 10 September 2011 20:11:00.)


Grub … ?


Were you impressed … ?


I was impressed … !


Seriously … !


I’m in enthusiastic burble mode.


You can tell, can’t you … ?


Ooooh, hang on, the Focus Puller … !


Yes …


I’m definitely burbling, aren’t … !


Right, hang on …


Cup of tea, deep breath …


And let me tell you about tonight’s episode of Dr Who … !


‹‹•››


Episode 10, The Girl Who Waited sees the Dr, Amy and Rory heading off for the resort world of Apalapucia: which the Dr happily claim’s is a lot less touristy than the universe’s best resort.


The trouble is, of course … ?


The one thing you EXPECT to be a problem on ANY foreign trip, really.


Getting caught up in Quarantine, on the way through.


Seemingly … ?


One will affect both the Doctor, and the natives, and kill either within a day.


The unfortunate thing … ?


Is that while the Doctor manages to get he and Rory back to the TARDIS, Amy is caught up in a mildly parallel time stream, initially designed to isolate infected visitors.


Notice I say mildly parallel … ?


Mildly parallel …


And slightly faster.


With the net result that Amy is left stranded for thirty-six years, being chased by the robots, the Hand-Bots.


‹‹•››


Now …


I’ll be frank, again, I don’t know if you actually caught The Girl Who Waited, tonight, but if you didn’t … ?


If you didn’t, I personally believe you’ve missed a cracker of an episode!


For starters, Karen Gillan’s performance, as both the older and younger Amy was amazing.


Yes, I know: and I’m honest enough to admit 5’11” of cute redhead’s very hard to ignore … !


But there’s a scene where ‘our’ Amy is interacting with her older self, through a magnifying glass that’s a joy to watch.


I’ll let you catch that for yourself.


But if you’ve missed tonight’s four-handed episode?


Well …


You’ve missed a treat … !

No comments:

Post a Comment

I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?

I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.

Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.

Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.

Thank you.

*   I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.

†   Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.