Can I tell you something, here … ?
Can I … ?
I have to admit, I, personally, never approve of Britain being part of the coalition that took part in the invasion of Iraq in the wake of the 9/11 attacks on the USA.
I felt the Afghanistan invasion was dubious: but had a certain amount of justification.
But the Iraq invasion … ?
No. I felt that was a US war. One that Britain had little excuse to be part of, and that we joined on very shaky grounds.
If I’ve understood things correctly, we had very shaky evidence to invade Iraq: the Dodgy Dossier was possibly only the start of it.
And — again, if I’ve understood things correctly — the UN mandates the coalition went into Iraq on the back of, were based on, again, very shaky ground.
Shaky: and having little in the way of international agreement.
So to see, today, that the UK’s House of Commons has been recalled, to discuss the chemical weapons attack in Syria, last Wednesday, is …
Well …
It’s something I’m concerned about, let’s put it that way.
PM: Speaker agrees request to recall Parliament on Thurs. Will be a clear Gov motion & vote on response to chemical weapons attacks. #Syria
— UK Prime Minister (@Number10gov) August 27, 2013
~≈î≈~
Now I realise I’m only one person.
But I’m one amongst many who felt that the Iraq War was not a good thing.
I felt we went in on shaky evidence, and an incomplete UN Mandate.
So, on seeing that Parliament is being recalled, I have to wonder about a lot of things.
Firstly … ?
Granted that a UN weapons inspection team has gone into Syria to check on what happened in the area of Damascus where the attack happened.
My hope, here, is that the team finds evidence — good evidence — of what chemical weapons were used. And, more to the point, by whom.
Once that’s put beyond doubt … ?
Once that’s so far beyond doubt that the leaders of Russia and China agree who was behind it, AND agree UN action against the perpetrators is needed.
Once that’s done … ?
Once that’s done, then I’ll be happy.
Possibly,
No comments:
Post a Comment
I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?
I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.
Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.
Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.
Thank you.
* I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.
† Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.