You know, I THINK I’ve had some interesting news, tonight.
Concerning the order I’d put in, for a four terabyte internal hard drive.
Let’s just say that — with a little help from a regular reader — I’ve had something of a result.
Including a £20 gift card.
At ANY rate … ?
That’s possibly something for the morning.
~≈Ú≈~
At any rate … ?
Something I know I’ve been meaning to do since before Christmas? And only now — with some time off — been able to do is catch up with something I’ve been watching.
Series 2 of the excellent Netflix version of House of Cards.
Given it’s been a few weeks … ?
I thought it was about time I sat down down with the next two episodes: episodes 10 and 11 …
Well, I don’t know about you, but I’d like to know what’s going in Washington …
~≈Ú≈~
Episode 10 sees Claire under threat, as an anti abortionist tries to blow up the Underwood residence. Whilst Frank is still at a MAJOR Cabinet meeting, dealing with a Chinese Naval blockade of Japanese territory. Meanwhile … ? Frank’s team have (discreetly) leaked detail’s of a Chinese money laundering scheme run by Ray Tusk: that seems to being used to found both the President, AND the Republican opposition.
Episode 11 sees Doug Stamper — Frank’s Chief of Staff — making some much needed — but potentially unwise — time: at an AA meeting. Confessing, as he does, that he has feelings for Rachel, the former call call who helped he and Frank in the first series. In the meantime … ? Frank is having to deal with a special prosecutor: asking some seriously in depth questions about his own connections to dodgy chinese businessman, Xander Feng. From here … ? Things can only get iffy …
~≈Ú≈~
Now …
Am I still enjoying series two?
Oh, yes. Granted I’ve not followed it as closely as I should: nor as it (possibly) deserves.
But House of Cards is still providing some much need murky entertainment.
Long may it do so!
No comments:
Post a Comment
I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?
I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.
Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.
Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.
Thank you.
* I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.
† Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.