3rd January, 2020
OK …
It’s a Friday night.
You’ve possibly noticed that, haven’t you … ?
It’s a Friday night … where I’m indoors … and thinking there’s something I could be watching on TV.
There’s plenty, certainly.
But nothing that caught my eye.
However?
Something did catch my eye.
I fancied something … grim …
~≈¥≈~
Episode 1 — The Rules of the Beast — introduces us to Jonathan Harker (John Heffernan): an English lawyer telling a nun, Sister Agatha, of how he arrived in Transylvia … to negotiate a land deal with the mysterious Count Dracula (Claes Bang).
Becoming more concerned the younger the count gets.
And the more he sees of the castle.
The less he likes it.
It’s only when Jonathan finds a secret passage to one of the less frequented parts of Castle Dracula … ?
That he realises that that yes …
The place isn’t as uninhabited as the Count claims …
~≈¥≈~
Now …
Have I enjoyed this first episode?
Was it good?
Yes: I have, actually.
Although, to be frank?
This first episode could have done with being a little shorter.
I gather that each episode of Dracula is about the same length: Gatiss and Moffat are repeating the basic format of their earlier Sherlock series.
That worked well enough, there, I felt: where each episode was exactly that, a separate episode.
Quite how that ninety minute length will work, I don’t know: but I suspect six forty-five minute episodes may have worked out better.
Because this did seem like two episode put together: and that episodes two and three may well be the same.
On the up side?
On the upside the writing is good: and the acting, superb.
With plaudits going to both Claes Bang as the Count, and to Dolly Wells as Sister Agatha van Helsing.
Actually? Ms Wells has the part cornered, I think: playing this generation’s van Helsing as a much a scientist as a vampire hunter.
Concerned with an interesting research subject, as with a problem that needs solving.
She’s rolled over a log — Jonathan Harker — and found an really interesting woodworm …
Given that? I’m looking forward to the next two episodes.
As overlong as they may be, I’m intrigued enough to want to keep watching.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?
I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.
Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.
Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.
Thank you.
* I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.
† Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.