OK, the Sunday Service on: which, this week, is a little bit too happy-clappy for my taste, but there you go.
But pone thing I noticed on the news?
Are apparent discussions in the Cabinet: on cancelling the TV license: and replacing it with subscription fees for the BC.
Personally?
I’m thinking that’s really not a good idea.
I think many of us — those of us who could never afford Sky, Netflix, what have you — would never be able to afford a subscriber based BBC.
Would never want the adverts the idea — to me — implies.
Would miss out on the one source of news that would get turned off if they don’t pay for it.
In all honesty? I think the idea is rooted in our current Tory government’s dislike for the BBC.
I can’t help but notice many of them seem to prefer to NOT be interviewed by Aunty.
~≈¥≈~
I don’t know about you … ?
But I saw the sad news of Caroline Flack’s death, yesterday.
My thoughts are with, and condolences go to, her family.
One thing I notice, though?
Is that Ms Flack had been charged with assaulting her partner.
Something I’ve learnt, very personally, over the years?
Is that — in between being arrested, charged and convicted — those facing criminal charges will feel suicidal.
Some? Will kill themselves, during the process.
My opinion? Is that these people need as much support as possibly: in order to survive the process, to serve their sentence and for justice to be done.
It sound like Ms Flack got charged, and got the legal help … but not necessarily the psychological help anyone in her shoes should get.
Justice — and Ms Flack’s family — lose out.
~≈¥≈~
As one final thought, there?
Ms Flack’s agency, Money Talent Management, have described the legal proceedings against her as a ‘showtrial.’
And as putting ‘huge pressure’ on a vulnerable person.
Hmmm …
I’m …
I can understand them saying that: they are trying to defend their client, after all.
But?
I feel vaguely insulted.
How do they feel about other women — or men — caught up in the same situation?
Not a lot, I suspect.
They may be keen to be seen to be doing the right thing.
But they are no help to anyone else who’s been charged.
~≈¥≈~
Let’s move on, shall we?
Yesterday’s Teaser saw Olga* and Debbi† putting in their answers: with Olga scoring five out of five, and Debbi on four.
Let’s see how everyone does with today’s questions, shall we?
* I think we’ll be OK with Storm Dennis, Olga‡: although it’s blowy. As for the computer …? Well, I’m working on an installer, I know that much … ! Hmmm … Word processing … I’ve have tried WPS Office: some time back. I found the ads off-putting: and it used it’s own proprietary format. I’ve not used Google Docs much: and couldn’t tell you much more than ‘It Looks OK.’ I haven’t used the word processor for years … but I’ve used LibreOffice’s equivalent to Excel fairly good for years. Its apps are similar enough to older versions of MS Office to make using it relatively easy, it’s free: and you can always store back ups in Google Docs. (I know use Apple’s Pages as a word processor: but started with LibreOffice.)
† Like I say, Debbi, most of my niggles are fairly minor. And that kernel panic was the first I’d seen in a while … ! (Um … strictly speaking, Debbi, it’s a two pound coin … )
‡ Oh, if you DO managed to get certified as an English teaser, Olga? Feel free to use the Video Teasers, if needed!
Q1) Germany Q2) 1918 Q3) Vilnius Q4) The Soviet Union Q5) Lithuanian Thanks, I'll investigate further. And you're right about Caroline Flack and accusations in general. I remember once one of our patients accused another of a crime and it was quite hard, in that case not only on both of them (the accusation wasn't true in the end), but also on the staff, as their livelihood was at risk as well. Thankfully it all got sorted quickly, but it caused much stress and strain on all involved. Ah, and thanks for the offer of the teaser! The course follows British English anyway, and it would be a great suggestion to recommend students to check blogs regularly, and researching the questions they'd improve their vocabulary as well.
I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?
I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.
Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.
Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.
Thank you.
* I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.
† Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.
Q1) Germany
ReplyDeleteQ2) 1918
Q3) Vilnius
Q4) The Soviet Union
Q5) Lithuanian
Thanks, I'll investigate further. And you're right about Caroline Flack and accusations in general. I remember once one of our patients accused another of a crime and it was quite hard, in that case not only on both of them (the accusation wasn't true in the end), but also on the staff, as their livelihood was at risk as well. Thankfully it all got sorted quickly, but it caused much stress and strain on all involved.
Ah, and thanks for the offer of the teaser! The course follows British English anyway, and it would be a great suggestion to recommend students to check blogs regularly, and researching the questions they'd improve their vocabulary as well.
I thought my number might be off by a bit. Just a bit. :)
ReplyDelete1. Russia
2. 1918
3. Vilnius
4. the Soviet Union
5. Lithuanian