Pages

Wednesday 5 February 2020

Nik Nak’s Daily Teaser — 5-2-2020: Sweets for My Sweet.

5th February, 2020.


Yes: I’ve done it, again: I’ve had a late — ish — night: catching up with the Apple TV+ show, For all Mankind.

Frankly?

It’s really rather good.


I know Apple’s better known for its hardware: I am sitting in front of a Mac, after all.

But, with For All Mankind, they’ve managed to make a very watchable series!

~≈Â≈~

Let’s move on, shall we?

Yesterday’s Teaser saw Olga* and Debbi† putting in their answers: with both scoring five out of five.

Let’s see how everyone does with today’s questions, shall we?

Here they are, along with the How To, License and video … 

Q1) Post-war sweet rationing ended in the UK: on 5th February of which year?
Q2) The rationing had been introduced during which war?
Q3) During war time sweet rationing, a person was allowed how many imperial ounces of sweets, per month: 14, 16 or 18?
Q4) Sweet rationing ended in February of the year in question.   Sugar rationing ended in the same year: but in which month?
Q5) The word, ‘sweets’ is the British English term.   What’s the usual American English term?
Q6) What — according to Wikipedia — is the Australian English term?
Q7) Some sweets contain gelatin.   Who usually won’t eat regular gelatin: vegans, Christians or Mormons?
Q8) Most sweets contain what: sugar, salt or burnt crunchy bits?
Q9) Chocolate — one of the world’s most popular sweets — and has it’s origins with which tribal people: the Olmec, Aztec or Maya … ?
Q10) Finally … ?   Bassett’s, The Natural Confectionery Company and Fry’s, are all sweet brands owned by which C?
Here’s yesterday’s questions and answers … 

Q1) The Codex Sinaiticus was discovered: on 4th February of which year?
A1) 1859.
Q2) The Codex Sinaiticus was discovered in which country: Egypt, Palestine or Israel?
A2) Egypt.
Q3) The Codex is written in which language: Greek, Aramaic or Hebrew?
A3) Greek.
Q4) The Codex is written in a type of script called what: black letter, uncial or rustic capitals?
A4) Uncial.   (I’m not sure: but believe many font foundries has typefaces based on Uncial.)
Q5) Finally?   The Codex Sinaiticus is a codex: obviously.   A codex is a type of what: scroll, book or tablet?
A5) Book.
Here’s a thought …
“If it is too sweet for him, let him eat salt. If it is not too sweet for him, let him eat liquorice.”
Sumerian proverb.
And a playlist …


Today’s questions will be answered in tomorrow’s Teaser.

Have a good day.



*        Ye gods, Olga, fourteen seasons?   That’s impressive for a TV series: especially when you consider the original Star Trek had three!   Which reminds me, I’m going to have to try and catch up with Star Trek: Picard: I’m hearing good things about it!   (Did I mention For All Mankind?)

†        Debbi, thanking you for the comment!   I’ve had a couple on the video version, as well: the fact I felt Praxeus was Pertweesque caught someone’s eye!

2 comments:

  1. Q1) 1953
    Q2) World War II
    Q3) During war time sweet rationing, a person was allowed how many imperial ounces of sweets, per month: 14, 16 or 18? (It seems it fluctuated. The web for historic UK says 12, the National Trust says between 8 and 16)
    https://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/upton-house-and-gardens/features/sweet-rationing-in-wwii
    https://www.historic-uk.com/CultureUK/Rationing-in-World-War-Two/
    Wikipedia says the same, that it fluctuated: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationing_in_the_United_Kingdom
    Q4) September
    Q5) Candy
    Q6) Lolly
    Q7) Vegans
    Q8) Sugar
    Q9) the Olmec
    Q10) Cadbury’s
    Yep, many seasons. For what I've read, the makers of the series (Supernatural) said they would happily carry on with it for as long as the two main actors wanted to, but I guess time has come...
    I was checking For All Mankind. I wonder why there are so many series about alternative historical events... Perhaps we're all a bit worried about the way things are going...

    ReplyDelete
  2. It was a bit, wasn't it? A good sign, I think. :) I'm kind of a fan of Old-School Who, so to speak. :)

    1. 1953
    2. World War II
    3. 16
    4. September
    5. candy
    6. lollies
    7. vegans
    8. sugar
    9. the Maya
    10. Cadbury

    ReplyDelete

I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?

I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.

Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.

Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.

Thank you.

*   I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.

†   Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.