Then moves on: showing us the Clarke family, a childless farmer and his wife, whose land is bought by the mysterious Lady Trieu (Hong Chau) … in return for a child of their own …
Meanwhile … ?
Meanwhile Angela/Sister Night (Regina King) is back at the Heritage Centre: finding out extra information that the Centre has about Will (Louis Gossett, Jr).
The fact he was in Angela/Sister Night’s (Regina King) car, when it was stolen by a drone?
Is a little contradictory.
The fact he’s not in the car, when it’s returned? Right in front of FBI agent Blake?
Is possibly a source of relief for Angela: she can retrieve some pills she’d taken from Will, and get them analysed.
Talking of Agent Blake/Silk Spectre (Jean Smart)?
She is working with the Tulsa Police Department.
And her first stop? Is to investigate Lady Trieu’s building project.
Blake thinks Angela’s car was stolen … by one of Lady Trieu’s drone operators.
Unknown to the Tulsa Police … ?
Adrien Veidt is doing a little boating.
Finding foetuses in a lake, artificially ageing them to produce two more of his cloned servants …
And using his new attendants to clean the bodies of their predecessors out of the Grand Hall.
He’s got a catapult, and he needs something to use as shot …
~≈Ô≈~
Now …
Have I managed to summarise tonight’s episode correctly?
Have I … ?
I suspect not!
But, once again, I’ve seen another strong episode in what I a compelling series!
We’ve got a fantastic ensemble cast, we’ve been introduced to an intriguing new character, more aspects of Angela’s backstory are being revealed, we seeing more of Adrien Veidt’s abilities.
And?
I want to see more of this unnervingly gorgeous background world.
Frankly?
I’ll be watching another episode, next week.
Hopefully?
You’ll be joining me …
* I knew the Rolling Stones version of the song, but not the Irma Thomas version. I’m glad I’m I watching this series: her version is far superior.
I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?
I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.
Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.
Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.
Thank you.
* I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.
† Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?
I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.
Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.
Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.
Thank you.
* I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.
† Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.