At any rate, it’s a Wednesday where I’m not scheduled for a meeting, a pest controller, or some sort of medical appointment.
That’s possibly a result.
~≈¥≈~
Oh …
Bless her, my mother managed to find an old Mac mouse and keyboard sitting around.
And I’ve just found the power cable/brick for Bruce: my 2007 era Mac mini.
All I need now … ?
Is a VGA monitor: given that, I can access some of the older games that macOS no longer supports.
~≈¥≈~
Let’s move on, shall we?
Yesterday’s Teaser saw Olga*, Mum†, Edith‡ and Debbi^ putting in their answers: with Olga and Debbi scoring five out of five, Mum on two, and Edith on zero.
Let’s see how everyone does with today’s questions, shall we?
Q2) 16th November is the feast day of Saint Matthew the Evangelist: according to the Eastern Orthodox Churches. Which of the Gospel is he supposed to have written?
“The scheme in question is the cutting of a canal through the Isthmus of Suez. This has been thought of from the earliest historical times, and for that very reason is looked upon as impracticable.”
Ferdinand de Lesseps, the man who built the canal.
The quizmaster’s decisions about scores are final.
Thank you for coming: have a good day.
* If I’ve got it right, Olga? The bomber was from Syria. And, from what the BBC’s saying, his application was turned down in 2014! I’d imagine the care levels in Syria could be one factor, certainly! On top of the mental health situation? He converted to Christianity, whilst here. The BBC are also saying a number of Iraqi and Iranian refugees have made … um … dubious religious conversions: in an effort to stay in the UK. Apparently, there’s a scheme known as pray to stay. My more cynical side would “He was on the swerve!”
Cheers: the Job Centre meeting went well enough: although I THINK my case worker’s ill: I’ve had my third in a fortnight! (I’ve another on Friday: about a scheme the Job Centre wants me to do.)
† Hello, Mum!
‡ Oh, yes, he did, didn’t he, Edith? It’s easy to forget! (Oh, sorry about yesterday’s score, Edith: yesterday’s quiz was brought than I thought. I hope today’s is easier!)
^ You’re right, Debbi, it is! Especially when you get a comment: thanking you! (I’m going to have to start watching Evil of the Daleks, soon: I want to take advantage of the momentum!)
Q5) A container ship That's funny, especially because one of the lessons I chose to teach, during the teacher's training course, was about homophones, although The Suez Canal didn't feature. (I'm taking note, though! It might come handy). Good to know the meeting went well, and you might be right about your worker, as they tend not to replace somebody if they are only on sick leave, and sometimes it can keep going for a while. Let's hope if that's the case, it isn't serious. They didn't give too many details here about the bombing/explosion, but it makes sense. And I'm not surprised about the conversions. That's bound to mess the mind of somebody who is not too well to begin with. What a mess! Enjoy your "off" day and I hope the scheme they suggest is useful.
I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?
I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.
Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.
Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.
Thank you.
* I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.
† Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.
Weird ol’ thing, Olga: I’ve got this mental image of you explaining the difference between Suez and sewers to a pupil!
ReplyDeleteAND explaining homophones!
English is weird!
Q1) 1869
ReplyDeleteQ2) Egypt
Q3) Egypt
Q4) The Red Sea
Q5) A container ship
That's funny, especially because one of the lessons I chose to teach, during the teacher's training course, was about homophones, although The Suez Canal didn't feature. (I'm taking note, though! It might come handy).
Good to know the meeting went well, and you might be right about your worker, as they tend not to replace somebody if they are only on sick leave, and sometimes it can keep going for a while. Let's hope if that's the case, it isn't serious.
They didn't give too many details here about the bombing/explosion, but it makes sense. And I'm not surprised about the conversions. That's bound to mess the mind of somebody who is not too well to begin with. What a mess!
Enjoy your "off" day and I hope the scheme they suggest is useful.
1. 1871
ReplyDelete2. Egypt
3. Lybia
4. Dead sea
5. A container Ship
Don't worry,I realize I have knowledge gaps.
1 1869
ReplyDelete2 Egypt
3 Libya
4 Red Sea
5 Container Ship
So many great episodes of Doctor Who. I'm looking forward to what's coming.
ReplyDeleteAnd I'm sorry to see Jodie Whittaker leave the show.
1. 1869
2. Egypt
3. Egypt
4. Red Sea
5. a container ship