Q1)4th July, 2024, the date of the UK’s latest General Election. Who is the Prime Minister that ordered this election: Rishi Sunak, Liz Truss, Theresa May or Boris Johnson?
Q4)The pre-election period is known as ‘purdah’. It usually lasts for how many weeks: six, seven or eight?
A4) Six weeks. (The term is generally frowned upon, these days: given its historical associations. However, I heard it used in some news broadcast in this election. Mostly followed by someone pointing out That the term was frowned on.)
Q5)Finally … ? Which parliamentary figure is usually unopposed at UK elections: the Speaker of the House of Commons, the Lord Speaker or Black Rod?
A5) The Speaker of the House of Commons. At the time of writing? The Speakership was held by Sir Lindsay Hoyle, before the election: he’s retained his parliamentary seat. Retaining the Speakership is another matter. Neither Black Rod nor the Lord Speaker, are elected to the Commons in the General election: Black Rod is an employee of the House of Lords, whilst the Lord Speaker is a member of the Lords.
Here’s a thought …
“This is a start on something we regard as extremely significant for the future”.
* The Greens, the party I voted for, ended up in fifth place: with 1,770 votes. Nationally, they’ve ended up with fourMPs.
† I knew about the term being out of favour, Olga: although a couple of BBC journalists used it, early on. Usually? Whoever they were talking to made the same point you did.
I think the best thing I could do for that charity is advertise them on the blog: or, at least, do a post or two telling people they can sign up for it at their local Job Centre or library. Or possibly from their social workers or council. I suspect the latter two options were the ones referring people in Basildon.
You’re right: George Orwell would be rolling his eyes!
‡ Hello, Mum!
§ Fit is probably putting it mildly, Debbi!
I know that — in Politics and the English Language — he says “If you use ready-made phrases, you not only don’t have to hunt about for words: you also don’t have to bother with the rhythms of your sentences”. I think he had “categorical pledge” on his list of ready-mades.
He’d probably be eyeing up some of the victory speeches, as well: very cynically.
Q5) twenty minutes Well, let's see how things go. It is tempting to say things can't get any worse, but that's tempting luck... And not taking into account the level of stupidity and lack of common sense of some people.
Hi, Paul: I forgot to mention that I had a long event to cover for the radio today (a picnic with activities and bit of a trek to get there), and I got another phone call yesterday from the editor to see if I could try and cover something that takes place nearby and starts just before, so I won't have much time to join in. Tomorrow I'm accompanying my mother in the morning to meet friends, as she gets lost if she goes alone, but I hope to join when we come back, as it is an early morning thing. Fingers crossed on everything.
I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?
I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.
Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.
Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.
Thank you.
* I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.
† Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.
1 TV
ReplyDelete2 1954
3 Richard Baker, John Snagge
4 Ten
5 30mins
Q1) TV
ReplyDeleteQ2) 1954
Q3) Richard Baker
Q4) Six
Q5) twenty minutes
Well, let's see how things go. It is tempting to say things can't get any worse, but that's tempting luck... And not taking into account the level of stupidity and lack of common sense of some people.
I can imagine.
ReplyDeleteHey, remember when 1984 was the future? :)
Scary! Time flies!
1. TV
2. 1954
3. Richard Baker
4. Ten
5. twenty minutes
Hi, Paul:
ReplyDeleteI forgot to mention that I had a long event to cover for the radio today (a picnic with activities and bit of a trek to get there), and I got another phone call yesterday from the editor to see if I could try and cover something that takes place nearby and starts just before, so I won't have much time to join in. Tomorrow I'm accompanying my mother in the morning to meet friends, as she gets lost if she goes alone, but I hope to join when we come back, as it is an early morning thing.
Fingers crossed on everything.