Q2)12th January, 1981, saw the debut of which series: All In The Family, Batman or Dynasty?
A2)Dynasty. (I’ve done a set about that, too. The fact Americans pronounce the title, DIE-nasty isn’t a recommendation …)
Q3)12th January, 1966, saw the debut of which series: All In The Family, Batman or Dynasty?
A3)Batman. Guess which TV show I haven’t done a set about?
Q4)The Taal Volcano erupted on 12th January, 2020. The volcano is where?
A4)The Philippines. (Neither volcano or the Philippines, are TV shows.)
Q5)Finally … ? Emperor Zeno fled his capital: on 12th January, AD475. He’d been ruler of where: the Byzantine Empire, the Roman Empire or the Ottoman Empire?
Q5) Celtic I remember you've talked about that a few times, although not especifically about the regulations. One wonder about that in LA as well. It seems they don't have enough water, but we sometimes watch some of these programmes where people build and renovate houses, and I'm sure they mention having people come and check that they are complying with the regulations before they can carry on with the work. Mind you, how good or bad the regulations are, and how much they have been adapted to the current circumstances and the problems with droughts and extreme weather is anybody's guess.
Oh, I forgot to comment about the medication. I guess one of the main problems is that we are talking about big numbers of people who would (theoretically) qualify for the medication, and taking into account that, at least at the moment, all these meds are very expensive, and they need to be taken in the long term (you don't give a "course" of the medication, because once you stop taking it, you put weight on again), it would mean a lot of money. And, they also keep coming up with more possible indications for it (all kinds of addictions as well), so the problem might escalate even more. More and more drugs are being investigated (of course, because there is a big market and a lot of money to be made), and they don't seem to be getting any cheaper. There would be an argument for saying that if people lose weight, many of the health problems that come with obesity would be avoided and there would be money saved, but this is always something difficult to account for. Long-term gains are hardly ever taken into account in times of crisis.
I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?
I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.
Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.
Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.
Thank you.
* I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.
† Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.
Q1) Glasgow
ReplyDeleteQ2) Scotland
Q3) the Clyde
Q4) a robin
Q5) Celtic
I remember you've talked about that a few times, although not especifically about the regulations. One wonder about that in LA as well. It seems they don't have enough water, but we sometimes watch some of these programmes where people build and renovate houses, and I'm sure they mention having people come and check that they are complying with the regulations before they can carry on with the work. Mind you, how good or bad the regulations are, and how much they have been adapted to the current circumstances and the problems with droughts and extreme weather is anybody's guess.
Oh, I forgot to comment about the medication. I guess one of the main problems is that we are talking about big numbers of people who would (theoretically) qualify for the medication, and taking into account that, at least at the moment, all these meds are very expensive, and they need to be taken in the long term (you don't give a "course" of the medication, because once you stop taking it, you put weight on again), it would mean a lot of money. And, they also keep coming up with more possible indications for it (all kinds of addictions as well), so the problem might escalate even more. More and more drugs are being investigated (of course, because there is a big market and a lot of money to be made), and they don't seem to be getting any cheaper. There would be an argument for saying that if people lose weight, many of the health problems that come with obesity would be avoided and there would be money saved, but this is always something difficult to account for. Long-term gains are hardly ever taken into account in times of crisis.
ReplyDelete1 Glasgow
ReplyDelete2 Scotland
3 Clyde
4 Robin
5 Glasgow Rangers