*Apparently, Olga, he’s been talking about a potential third term. The only upside to that is that we can finally use the phrase “trampling on the Constitution.” (I’m no expert on US constitutional law: but believe modifying the Constitution needs X-amount of states to approve any changes. Hopefully, any moves of his run out of time.)
† Hello, Mum!
‡ Oh, that there is Debbi: a lot of it goes unrecognised, too. At ANY rate … ? I hope the footage looks good! (I’m assuming you’re using Final Cut, is that right? I wish I could afford it!)
§ I’ve JUST got your messages, Irene … your answers went through on the video for the 28th: so I’ve just had to add your answers to yesterday’s post, and your score to today’s. (Although, strictly, you missed the 7am deadline.)
“Publishing Failed”, you say? That’s the first time I’ve seen that: so couldn’t tell you how to get around it. But would suggest what I usually do: writing your answers in Google Docs/Notes/TextEdit/NotePad/what-have-you, then copying them over: that usually seems to help. Mum¶, Olga¶ and Debbi¶ may be able to help.
¶ Mum, Olga, Debbi, have you any ideas for Irene … ? She got a Publishing Failed message, yesterday.
Q5) WW2 Sorry about Irene. I had similar problems in other blogs, and sometimes trying later seems to sort the problem, although I do what you suggest and copy the questions into a document, answer them all, and then cut and paste into your page, because otherwise it might take too long to answer. (And that way you have the answers if, for some reason, they don't go through). But I normally use my computer and not the phone, so I'm not sure if there might be other issues. Oh, Trump will try anything. In theory the American Constitution was created with the intention of preventing another king trying to take over (or somebody to try to become a King or an Emperor or... a Dictator?) So there is a system of checks and balances, but it all depends on who has the majority in the Senate and the House. But, I think many Republicans are having 'a few doubts' about Trump by now (if they didn't to begin with). That he will try, I have no doubt. Yesterday I kept reading that he was very angry with the Zelenski debacle because he wanted to get the peace signed because he wants to get the Nobel Peace Prize (although he keeps writing the Noble). Of course, Obama got it (mind you, I don't think he deserved it, but well, compared to this one he is Mother Teresa), and he is nothing if not envious and mean-spirited.
I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?
I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.
Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.
Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.
Thank you.
* I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.
† Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.
Q1) Mercia
ReplyDeleteQ2) England
Q3) Lichfield
Q4) Lindisfarne
Q5) WW2
Sorry about Irene. I had similar problems in other blogs, and sometimes trying later seems to sort the problem, although I do what you suggest and copy the questions into a document, answer them all, and then cut and paste into your page, because otherwise it might take too long to answer. (And that way you have the answers if, for some reason, they don't go through). But I normally use my computer and not the phone, so I'm not sure if there might be other issues.
Oh, Trump will try anything. In theory the American Constitution was created with the intention of preventing another king trying to take over (or somebody to try to become a King or an Emperor or... a Dictator?) So there is a system of checks and balances, but it all depends on who has the majority in the Senate and the House. But, I think many Republicans are having 'a few doubts' about Trump by now (if they didn't to begin with). That he will try, I have no doubt. Yesterday I kept reading that he was very angry with the Zelenski debacle because he wanted to get the peace signed because he wants to get the Nobel Peace Prize (although he keeps writing the Noble). Of course, Obama got it (mind you, I don't think he deserved it, but well, compared to this one he is Mother Teresa), and he is nothing if not envious and mean-spirited.
1 Mercia
ReplyDelete2 England
3 Lichfield
4 Lindisfarne
5 WW2
1.Mercia
ReplyDelete2.England
3.Lichfield
4.Lindisfarne
5.WW2
So ... point off for not adding "festival" to "sauerkraut", I guess? :)
ReplyDelete1. Mercia
2. England
3. Lichfield
4. Lindisfarne
5. WW2
Kilroy was here, too! :)