Pages

Sunday, 25 May 2025

Nik Nak’s Daily Teaser — 25-4-2025 — Tubular Bells

25th May, 2025: Tubular Bells.


It’s officially Sunday morning.

So … ?

I woke up with an earworm — the theme to Tiswas — banging through my head.


Why?

If I knew that, I’d be rich … 

~≈☀️≈~

At any rate, I’ve finished my written and video review: of “Wish World”, yesterday’s episode of Dr Who.


It has to be said: Archie Panjabi is doing a very good job as the Rani.


~≈🫅🏽≈~

Let’s move on.

Yesterday’s Teaser saw Olga*, Mum† and Debbi‡ putting in their answers: with Olga and Debbi scoring five out of five, and Mum on four.

Let’s see how everyone does with today’s five question set, shall we?

Here they are, along with the How To, License and video.

Q1)        Tubular Bells was released on 25th May.   Of which year of the 1970s?

Q2)        By whom: Mike Oldfield, Sally Oldfield or Pete Oldfield?

Q3)        How old was the artist, when he recorded it: 19, 20 or 21?

Q4)        The cover of Tubular Bells featured on a series of stamps in 2010.   Which Blur LP was also in that set?

Q5)        Finally … ?   Tubular Bells was the first LP to be released on Virgin Records.   Who founded Virgin: Ahmet Ertegun, Richard Branson or Chris Blackwell?
Here’s yesterday’s questions and answers … 

Q1)        In a non-leap year, 24th May is the one hundredth and forty-fourth (144th) day of the year.   What is it in a leap year?
A1)        The one hundredth and forty-fifth.   (145th.)

Q2)        One hundred and forty-four is a what number: square number, circular number or triangular number?
A2)        A square number.
Q3)        One hundred and forty-four is a Fibonacci number.   Fibonacci, himself, was from where: Spain, Italy or Portugal?
A3)        Italy.   (The sequences start with zero and one. Each number in the sequence is the sum of the two numbers before it: so the first few entries are 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, and so on …)

Q4)        One hundred and forty-four is a what: gross, grotesque or Grimaldi?
A4)        A gross.

Q5)        Finally … ?   As a modelling scale, 1:144 is roughly half an inch to how many feet?
A5)        Six feet/foot.
Here’s a thought …
“Its contribution to British music was recognised when [its creator] played extracts during the 2012 Summer Olympics opening ceremony in London.”
From the Wikipedia entry on the LP.
And some distorted guitar …


The next ten question set will be on 28th May: it’s about the first Old Firm derby!

Comments and answers will be published tomorrow morning.

Today’s questions will be answered in tomorrow’s Teaser.

Decisions about scores are final.

Thank you for coming: have a good day.




*        I think ‘weird’ is putting it mildly, Olga.   As is cock-up!   And that’s the thing that gets me: my surgery did check online.   They’ve had the communication system up for some years.
        It’s … well … weird … 

        Hello, Mum … !

        I’d have a copy myself, Debbi: but that’s a lot of cash … !   It’s about the same as an iPad, at least … !

5 comments:

  1. 1 1973
    2 Mike Oldfield
    3 19
    4 Parklife
    5 Richard Branson

    ReplyDelete
  2. Q1) 1973

    Q2) Mike Oldfield

    Q3) 19

    Q4) Parklife

    Q5) Richard Branson

    ReplyDelete
  3. I didn't see the birds at all yesterday and they haven't put in an appearance today either. I wonder...

    ReplyDelete
  4. I hope the birds are okay.

    1. 1973
    2. Mike Oldfield
    3. 19
    4. Parklife
    5. Richard Branson

    Boy, John Lydon says a mouthful about Branson, Virgin Records, EMI, Malcolm, Sid, and (for sure) Nancy Spungen. OMG!

    I'll never be able to look at that Gary Oldman clip again. Love Gary Oldman, too. Shame about that, huh?

    And the Bill Grundy show! Wow!

    What a great piece of writing Lydon's book is.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 1. 1973
    2. Mike Oldfield
    3. 19
    4. Parkside
    5. Richard Branson

    ReplyDelete

I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?

I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.

Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.

Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.

Thank you.

*   I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.

†   Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.