Pages

Saturday 6 April 2013

Dr Who: Series 7 Part 2 — Episode 7 The Rings Of Akhaten

Merry
 Hmmm … 

It has to be said, I’m having a gentle case of mixed feelings, tonight: I really am … 

Mild disappointment … 

Along with a quiet sense of impressedness: that’s assuming you and I both understand what I mean by impressedness, I know it’s giving my spell-checker a case of the dottéd red lines.

At least, I hope you know what I mean, anyway.
At The Door

Grandfather
 At any rate — and as you’ve possibly guessed from the title — I’ve just finished watching tonight’s episode of Dr Who.

Hence the mixed feelings.

I’m thinking it’s a fantastically crafted episode.

And possibly one’s that’s hit a formula … 

I’ll go Hmmm, again, and see if I can’t tell you what I mean.

~~≈≈~~
The Doctor and the God

The Rings Of Akhaten sees the Doctor challenging Clara to think of somewhere she can be taken.

With Clara simply telling him to take her ‘somewhere awesome’.

Ending up the Rings of Akhaten of the episode’s title: a series of rings — some of which are inhabited — around a star.   And one that shares an orbit with an asteroid based pyramid housing a being the locals believe is a mummified god: one that has to be appease by having things offered to it, once every few years.

And one that needs to be constantly be song to, to guarantee it never awakens.

You can practically see the plot-line waiting to happen, can’t you … ?

~~≈≈~~

At ANY rate … ?   At any rate, is a great little episode: and a nicely written one, from Dr Who newcomer, Neil Cross.

Where I think I’m a touch disappointed, is in the simple fact that — as good as the episode is, and as muych as it contributes to the ongoing development of Clara Oswald — I personally found it to be a touch formulaic.

OK, granted, it fits nicely with the series under Russell T. Davies: which is what makes it something of a backwards step, for me.

It hasn’t — yet — contributed to anything to the as yet unanswered questions that the Moffat years have contributed to the show.

THAT’S where I’m disappointed.

Hmmm … 

Let’s see what happens next week, shall we … ?

No comments:

Post a Comment

I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?

I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.

Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.

Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.

Thank you.

*   I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.

†   Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.