And, yes: I’m looking forward to my next day off, Sunday.
Frankly? Catching up with sleep will be good, as would … well … all sorts of things.
~≈§≈~
Actually … ?
Not being a mussel would be .
I’ve got Radio 4’s Today program on in the background: as ever.
In amongst the daily updates on Brexit, other stuff about Brexit, and the Cabinet’s feuds — triggered by Brexit — there’s been a report …
That all mussels bought in shops are contaminated by seaborne micro-plastic waste.
That’s …
Well, frankly? I’ve never really been one for shellfish.
The effect we’re having — on our own diets — is one more reason for me to not try it.
~≈§≈~
Oh …
One more thing …
You’ve realised that I’m not a football fan. But am a technology watching ex-barman.
One who’s noticed that Amazon have bought the rights to screen various English Premier League football matches from 2019.
I’m THINKING that could have a big impact on the pub trade.
As — if I’ve understood things correctly, and depending on the price structure — all a pub; would need would be a Fire stick, and an Amazon Prime subscription.
Which, from what I could see? Are a LOT cheaper than the prices Sky and BT charge pubs.
Frankly?
If the hospitality industry can move fast on this — in negotiating those prices — it could save itself a fortune on costs.
Q3)7th June, 1868, marks the birth of architect and designed, Charles Rennie Mackintosh. The Mackintosh designed Lighthouse, in Glasgow, was the former office of which newspaper?
* Glad to help, Olga: I hope Nancy’s effect goes down as well! Quite what the song means, I’ve never managed to figure … !
† Ice hockey, you mean, Debbi? you know, we don’t get much of it, over here! (Don’t know if you read the bits about Amazon buying up the rights to English football matches … but I suspect they’ll be doing something similar in the US. That’s going to be a game changer, I think.)
Q1) The Pacific Q2) Dog with a Blog Q3) Nineteen Eighty-Four Q4) The United Kingdom Q5) Medina Thanks. No, I have no idea either, although recently, in the underground in Barcelona witnessed a great rendition of These Boots Are Made for Walking, live, with a fair amount of jumping around and all. I am sure Amazon has plenty of cards up its sleeves...
I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?
I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.
Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.
Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.
Thank you.
* I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.
† Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.
Q1) The Pacific
ReplyDeleteQ2) Dog with a Blog
Q3) Nineteen Eighty-Four
Q4) The United Kingdom
Q5) Medina
Thanks. No, I have no idea either, although recently, in the underground in Barcelona witnessed a great rendition of These Boots Are Made for Walking, live, with a fair amount of jumping around and all. I am sure Amazon has plenty of cards up its sleeves...
Uh, yeah. I keep wondering when the anti-trust people are going to step in and say, "Enough! You can't own everything!" :)
ReplyDelete1. the Pacific
2. Dog with a Blog
3. Nineteen Eighty-Four, aka, 1984
4. the UK
5. Medina