Tak does not require that we think of him. Only that we think.
Pages
▼
Saturday, 25 January 2020
Nik Nak’s Daily Teaser — 25-2-2020: Burns Night
25th January 2020.
I have to admit, I am seriously annoyed at YouTube.
Really annoyed.
As you may know, I had been accepted onto YouTube’s Partnership programme.
In other words?
I could earn money from advertising revenue.
Until yesterday … when YouTube decided they would take me off the programme.
NOT something I’m happy about, understandably.
The reason they’ve done it … ? Is that I have to much ‘Reused content.’
Quite what that means … ?
I’m not TOO sure: but apparently ‘ … it may also mean that we’ve identified that large portions of your channel either completely match other content, or are noticeably similar.’
It means — as far as I can tell — that I’ve a lot of culling to do, before I reapply in late February.
~≈Ü≈~
Let’s move on, shall we?
Yesterday’s Teaser saw Olga* putting in her answers: scoring five out of five in the process.
Let’s see how everyone does with today’s questions, shall we?
Q3)The 20th Amendment to the US Constitution was passed: on 24th January, 1933. It defined the length of of what: elected federal office, unelected federal office, or state governor’s office?
* Sounds like Spain’s got a possible flooding issue, there, Olga: I can only hope things dry up, fast. As for the history series … ? What can I tell you, Olga: except they’re wonderful to watch!
Q1) 1759 Q2) Greenwich Q3) To a Mouse Q4) Auld Lang Syne Q5) A Red, Red Rose How annoying about YouTube! It's impossible to know what they mean when they just quote chunks of regulations that might mean anything. Is it because of clips used, because you reuse questions, or even because the content of the teasers is the same as in your own blog... Evidently, if you were copying somebody else, they'd remove the videos, so it must be your own content... A puzzlement. Did you manage to get any money at all? One of my friend Iman's work colleagues (she lives and works at a hospital in Paris) did quite well with YouTube videos for a while. She did handcraft videos (I don't know if you recall those bracelets made of tiny coloured rubber bands..., well those) and it seems she had thousands of followers for a while (she didn't speak, she just showed the technique, so language wasn't a problem), but it seems it fell out of fashion and that was that. Perhaps you need a cat or a dog ;) By the way, have you heard from Debbi? She was probably busy, but as she normally comments...
I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?
I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.
Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.
Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.
Thank you.
* I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.
† Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.
Q1) 1759
ReplyDeleteQ2) Greenwich
Q3) To a Mouse
Q4) Auld Lang Syne
Q5) A Red, Red Rose
How annoying about YouTube! It's impossible to know what they mean when they just quote chunks of regulations that might mean anything. Is it because of clips used, because you reuse questions, or even because the content of the teasers is the same as in your own blog... Evidently, if you were copying somebody else, they'd remove the videos, so it must be your own content... A puzzlement. Did you manage to get any money at all?
One of my friend Iman's work colleagues (she lives and works at a hospital in Paris) did quite well with YouTube videos for a while. She did handcraft videos (I don't know if you recall those bracelets made of tiny coloured rubber bands..., well those) and it seems she had thousands of followers for a while (she didn't speak, she just showed the technique, so language wasn't a problem), but it seems it fell out of fashion and that was that. Perhaps you need a cat or a dog ;)
By the way, have you heard from Debbi? She was probably busy, but as she normally comments...
Hi! Sorry I missed yesterday's teaser. And sorry to hear about YouTube.
ReplyDeleteInstead of relying YouTube for income, I'd suggest taking your teasers and compiling them into various ebooks.
I thought your Doctor Who review was spot on!
You could become a Doctor Who YouTuber, too! That sounds fun! Your reviews are original content. And there's a huge fanbase out there!
1. 1759
2. Greenwich
3. To a Mouse
4. Auld Lang Syne
5. To a Red, Red Rose