The first episode of series one, as you’re asking.
~≈¥≈~
Episode 1 — Remembrance — opens with a long shot: one that eventually closes in the USS Enterprise D.
And shows us a near empty Ten Forward Lounge, occupied only by Captain Jean-Luc Picard (Patrick Stewart) playing poker with Lieutenant Commander Date (Brent Spiner).
A game that rapidly comes to an end, when the Enterprise goes into orbit around Mars: a Mars that is soon revealed to be under attack.
~≈¥≈~
We realise this is a dream, however …
As Picard awakens in his bedroom at Chateau Picard, the family estate: many years after he has retired from Starfleet.
Retired … after helping to rescue many Romulans, after a super nova has destroyed Romulus, after the genuine attack on Mars by synthetic lifeforms — androids — and after a major arguments with his former bosses.
He’s to be interviewed about the anniversary of the Supernova: an interview that goes into some unexplored territory.
~≈¥≈~
The scene shifts: to the bedroom of Dahj (Isa Briones), and her boyfriend.
Just after she announces her big news — that she’s been accepted in to the Daystrom Institute, the Federation’s premiere robots institute — her flat is attacked, her boyfriend killed …
And she finds that she’s more than capable of dealing with her attackers.
Dealing with them, and fleeing the scene … only to end up — after seeing the interview — at the home of Admiral Picard …
A men she’s never met … but in whose company she feels very safe.
All Admiral Picard can do … ?
Is offer to help a young woman who seems very familiar.
~≈¥≈~
Now …
Have I enjoyed Star Trek: Picard’s opening episode?
Yes I have, thanking you.
I remember Sir Terry Pratchett one saying that the Discworld was escapism: with the definition that well performed escapist literature enabled you to escape to somewhere, rather than from somewhere …
With the subtext that seeing familiar characters was part of the appeal.
I have to admit I liked the theme tune: it’s different enough from Discovery’s to make it distinct … yet similar enough to tell you it’s a member of the same family …
I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?
I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.
Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.
Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.
Thank you.
* I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.
† Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.
As a quick final thought … ?
ReplyDeleteI have to admit I liked the theme tune: it’s different enough from Discovery’s to make it distinct … yet similar enough to tell you it’s a member of the same family …