Q1)The results of a first 2022 Conservative Party leadership contest were announced: on 5th September, 2022. Who won: Liz Truss, Rishi Sunak or Boris Johnson?
Q2)The winner became the UK’s what: Foreign Secretary, Chancellor or Prime Minister?
Q3)How long did the winner last in that office: forty-seven days, forty-nine days or fifty-one days?
Q4)Who appointed the winner to office: George 6th, Elizabeth 2nd or Charles 3rd?
Q5)The winner was outlasted by a what: lettuce, legume or lentil?
Q6)Finally? The winner was replaced by whom: Rishi Sunak, Theresa May or Boris Johnson?
Q1)Los Angeles was founded on 4th September as El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora la Reina de los Ángeles del Río de Porciúncula. 4th September of which year: 1780, 1781 or 1782?
A1)1781. (The name translates as The Town of Our Lady the Queen of the Angels of the River of the Porciuncula.)
Q2)The Pueblo is now Los Angeles. It’s also known as the City of what: angels, apostrophes or oysters?
“The process for the 2022 leadership election was approved by the 1922 Committee on 11 July. Nominations opened and closed on 12 July, with each candidate needing to have nominations from at least 20 Conservative MPs to reach the first ballot.”
* In both cases, the killers were caught alive. I’m grateful. I’d like to know what these two were up to: as, I imagine, would the families of their victims.
† Oh, you’re not wrong about Wagner, Olga¶: Stephen Fry did a fascinating documentary about him: and admitted he (Fry) loved Wagner’s music but found the composer’s anti-semitism troubling.
I’m sympathetic, Olga, I really am: if those digital poverty pieces of mine hadn’t been released … ? Well … ! (It’s not so much the lack of publication, is it? It’s the waste of the work we put in.)
‡ Hello, Mum! (I think Jude’s heading home after school, today, Mum: it’s his first day back, isn’t it?)
§ Oh, I knew it was the suburbs of LA, Debbiᐦ: that’s kind of why I picked it for the playlist. It’s got a connection, however tenuous. I’ve seen that video, too. They’re not the best choreographed dancers, are they?
¶ I think, Olga, that Wagner and Jackson have something in common: there’s a positive legacy to both, as well as a negative one. I think Rowling may be put in the same bracket: even if I’m not a fan.
Gill? I’m happier avoiding using the Gill Sans font: there’s plenty of alternatives. The same, I think, goes for Marion Zimmer Bradley: she … well …
ᐦ They could be worse, Debbi, they could be the ones in the “Addicted to Love” video. Are they on the beat? Yes. Are they on the same beat? Dearie, dearie me … (Then there’s the drummer, Debbi: the drummer needs a lesson in enthusiasm!)
Q5) a lettuce, (although I’m sure the other two would have outlasted her as well, no problem)
Q6) Rishi Sunak Oh, I wasn't aware of Marian Zimmer Bradley, but that is horrible. Yes, I guess there are certain things that, once you know them, put a different perspective on everything someone has done. And yes, it isn't the publication itself but the amount of work. Also, in your case, you did it to make a point and to bring it to public attention, so it was important that people were, at least, given the opportunity to hear about it. In my case it wasn't anything important other than for people who were studying the author, but my gut feeling is that, after such comments, he is unlikely to be the subject of many studies, as it would prove too unpopular a choice and too controversial.
I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?
I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.
Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.
Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.
Thank you.
* I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.
† Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.
1 Liz Truss
ReplyDelete2 Prime Minister
3 47
4 Charles 3rd
5 Lentil
6 Rishi Sunak
Q1) Liz Truss
ReplyDeleteQ2) Prime Minister
Q3) forty-nine days
Q4) Elizabeth 2nd
Q5) a lettuce, (although I’m sure the other two would have outlasted her as well, no problem)
Q6) Rishi Sunak
Oh, I wasn't aware of Marian Zimmer Bradley, but that is horrible. Yes, I guess there are certain things that, once you know them, put a different perspective on everything someone has done.
And yes, it isn't the publication itself but the amount of work. Also, in your case, you did it to make a point and to bring it to public attention, so it was important that people were, at least, given the opportunity to hear about it. In my case it wasn't anything important other than for people who were studying the author, but my gut feeling is that, after such comments, he is unlikely to be the subject of many studies, as it would prove too unpopular a choice and too controversial.
Yeah. And wow about Liz Truss and the lettuce. Wow! :)
ReplyDelete1. Liz Truss
2. Prime Minister
3. forty-nine days
4. Charles 3rd
5. lettuce
6. Rishi Sunak
I keep reading about what goes on and I wonder ... what next? :)