Yesterday was Yom Kippur: the Jewish Day of Atonement, the holiest day of the Jewish year.
The day when Britain’s Jewish community would be praying, fasting and seeking forgiveness for the sins of the past year.
And the day when an attacker killed two people at a Manchester synagogue: something police are calling a terrorist attack.
It’s …
I’m having to think about wording, here.
You and I may not like the actions of the Israeli government in Gaza.
I know I don’t: I think the actions of Netanyahu’s government border on religiously-motivated genocide.
I disagree with that government’s actions.
That does not give me the right to kill, injure, or maim, people for being Jewish, nor does it give me the right to kill people at prayer.
It gives no-one the right to kill!
I’ve long felt killing in the name of a cause is a bad way of promoting it, is tantamount to invalidating it.
That’s what the killer did, yesterday.
In taking the lives of at least two people, he has not promoted cause of the people of Gaza.
He’s killed it: as certainly as he’s killed Adrian Daulby and Melvin Cravitz, his victims.
~≈✡️≈~
A few days ago … ?
I told you of the government’s proposed digital ID: and of how there was a petition against it.
I object: largely on the grounds of cost.
But also as I feel that making it mandatory — as Sir Keir Starmer was proposing — is a bad move.
And a waste of effort: as most of us who are hunting, already have valid ID.
At any rate, if you’re in the UK, I’d appreciate you signing that petition.
Every little helps, and all that!
But I should add a few things.
The web site tells us enough signatures have been gathered: and that the petition must be debated in Parliament.
And tells us that the government has responded.
By telling us:
“We will introduce a digital ID within this Parliament to help tackle illegal migration, make accessing government services easier, and enable wider efficiencies. We will consult on details soon.”
They also tell us:
“… there are too many people who are excluded, like the 1 in 10 UK adults who don’t have a physical photo ID, so can struggle to prove who they are and access the products and services they are entitled to.”
And that:
“It will not be compulsory to obtain a digital ID but it will be mandatory for some applications.”
There’s possibly a ton of things, there.
The one in ten adults the response tells us “don’t have a physical photo ID”?
Do they have smart phones?
That’s the point that my objections hinged on: if you don’t have/can’t afford a smart phone, you can’t have this ID.
An ID that the response tells us isn’t compulsory to have … but whose use is mandatory.
Either the government has no idea what it’s saying.
Or its use of double speak is improving.
Or … ?
It’s all mouth and trousers.
~≈⏫≈~
In the midst of all that … ?
I’m actually up, early: and was hoping to get out early.
I’ve an optician’s appointment, today!
Heigh ho!
~≈🤓≈~
Let’s move on.
Yesterday’s Teaser saw Mum*, Olga† and Debbi‡ putting in their answers: with everyone scoring five out of five.
Let’s see how everyone does with today’s questions, shall we?
“The [ … ] Classical languages, or the Śāstrīya Bhāṣā (Hindi) or the Dhrupadī Bhāṣā (Assamese, Bengali) or the Abhijāta Bhāṣā (Marathi) or the Cemmoḻi (Tamil), is an umbrella term …”.
From the Wikipedia entry on the classical languages.
And an video …
The next ten question set is on 24th October: it’s about Zambia
Your comments will be published, tomorrow morning.
* Hello, Mum! (Did you mean Robert Runcie’s son, Mum?)
† Oh, know, it wasn’t a region thing, Olga. I had to resize the video, after I’d dumped the original project, and used QuickTime, which exports to .mov, rather than Handbrake, which uses recodes a file to .mp4. Blogger refuses to play .mov files.
A water melon … ? A whole water melon … ?? That gives me an idea! Either way, it sounds like Loudes and her aunt were close: ending up with a flat full of memories would’ve been something! (Aunty Bella rented the family home for years: so I couldn’t inherit it, unless I was on the tenancy. Which is a shame: I’ve as many memories of it as Lourdes does of her place.)
As a final thought … ? Southend football club has stopped taking cash: apparently, they’re facing a backlash! (London buses only take contactless cards, or Oyster card. You can pay cash on the London Underground: but it’s cheaper to use contactless.)
‡ Yes, I’ve corrected the scores, Debbi!
I don’t know if there’s any missing Danger Man episodes, Debbi: but all bar the last two episodes were in colour, I think. But I know The Avengers first few episodes were in black and white, as well: and the series had a lot of missing episodes.
Oh, I’ve just checked The Avenger’s wikipedia page. There was an actor called Jon Rollason — blowed if I know why his name rings a bell! — who appeared in three episodes: as a replacement for Ian Hendry. Rollason also crisps up in “The Web of Fear” as a anotty journalist.
I can understand why the police killed the attacker.
He was, as far as they could tell, armed with a car to run people over, a knife — several people were stabbed — and a bomb belt: that could, had it been viable, killed many more innocent people.
So I can understand their actions.
But part of it thinks it’s a shame he was killed.
As getting information on his motive, from him, directly, would be easier than getting it from his digital devices …
Q5) Hindi It happens so often, that the people who commit these kinds of crimes are killed (more so in the USA, but everywhere, it seems) and there are so many unanswered questions... Although sometimes, even when they are alive, the answers aren't forthcoming or satisfying as such. Probably they can trace back if the individual belonged to some organisation or followed some radical people, but from that to preventing new attacks... Once again, it just goes to show that it isn't always a matter of bombs or weapons alone. If one wants to harm somebody, there are easier ways to go about it. Double speak, I think, about the IDs issue. Here, the government always says that "they are considering" taking matters to the courts, whenever something happens or somebody says something they don't like. Mostly, thankfully, they don't do it. The extreme right party, Vox, on the other hand, are forever taking everybody and every organisation to court... They must have a lot of lawyers and judges as members, and they want to keep them working... Good luck with your appointment!
I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?
I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.
Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.
Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.
Thank you.
* I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.
† Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.
1 India
ReplyDelete2 Eleven
3 Sanskrit
4 22
5 Hindi
As a final thought on the Manchester attack?
ReplyDeleteI can understand why the police killed the attacker.
He was, as far as they could tell, armed with a car to run people over, a knife — several people were stabbed — and a bomb belt: that could, had it been viable, killed many more innocent people.
So I can understand their actions.
But part of it thinks it’s a shame he was killed.
As getting information on his motive, from him, directly, would be easier than getting it from his digital devices …
Q1) India
ReplyDeleteQ2) eleven
Q3) Tamil
Q4) twenty-two
Q5) Hindi
It happens so often, that the people who commit these kinds of crimes are killed (more so in the USA, but everywhere, it seems) and there are so many unanswered questions... Although sometimes, even when they are alive, the answers aren't forthcoming or satisfying as such.
Probably they can trace back if the individual belonged to some organisation or followed some radical people, but from that to preventing new attacks...
Once again, it just goes to show that it isn't always a matter of bombs or weapons alone. If one wants to harm somebody, there are easier ways to go about it.
Double speak, I think, about the IDs issue. Here, the government always says that "they are considering" taking matters to the courts, whenever something happens or somebody says something they don't like. Mostly, thankfully, they don't do it. The extreme right party, Vox, on the other hand, are forever taking everybody and every organisation to court... They must have a lot of lawyers and judges as members, and they want to keep them working...
Good luck with your appointment!
Thanks, Paul! I don't suppose an American should sign a British petition, but I wouldn't be wild about the digital ID thing, either.
ReplyDelete1. India
2. 11
3. Sanskrit
4. twenty-two
5. Hindi
I just saw a movie called Don't Look Now from 1973 with Donald Sutherland and Julie Christie.
Donald Sutherland looked like he took fashion advice from the Fourth Doctor! :)
He had the scarf, the coat, the curly hair! It was so funny.