Pages

Saturday 27 June 2009

That’s Some of the Money, Mr Pickles …




Well, I’ve managed to do some digging …
And managed to find — right here — the details of Mr Pickles ‘state of the art’ laptop.

It’s a Lenovo …

Ah HEM!!



Just so you know, that’s the Chinese company that had been the PC arm of IBM; at least, until it got bought out, a few years ago.


And one that I’ve not heard much about, in its modern incarnation; although in its original form, both IBM as much as Apple did a lot to popularise home computer use. But a company known — as far as I can see — for doing a workmanlike, rather than an innovative job

That cost him £869•50p

Hardly the £7, 500 that the Gazette were claiming.

What did seemingly cost a packet, was the unspecified software from Limelight Software; although, apparently, the domain registration they supplied didn’t cost much, the software they supplied cost £1065•25p.

I’m also going to point out that the public purse also paid Limelight £500 in consultancy fees, on Mr P’s behalf.

And, on top of that, there was also £1, 169•13p paid to Qunique, the company that supplied the laptop, for a document scanner kit*. Now while I realise that there’s specialised kit for scanning in books, scrolls, large sized images and whatever else, I can’t see Eric Pickles needing such a thing.

It does raise questions. For a start, why does he — or any other MP — should need much more than a all in one printer-scanner-copier*? Costing anywhere from about £70, to about £250ish.

And what was the £1069 worth of software? The various claim forms lodged with the Fees Office have large areas of black ink.

Mr Pickles says he has nothing to hide.

The claims forms seem to say otherwise.







* I’m no expert. But this, to me, looks the sort of large scale semi-pro industrial kit I’d’ve expected Miss Vix — who did so much of the artwork for my pub quiz posters — to want to use. It looks the sort of price I’d be expecting an artist to pay for a piece of kit enabling them to digitise large-sized (up to A2, which she was capable of doing) images, when they needed them to be transfer to a website.

No comments:

Post a Comment

I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?

I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.

Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.

Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.

Thank you.

*   I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.

†   Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.