* High Castle’s worth a watch, Olga. And the finale’s well made, even if I felt it could be better. The first series even manages to stick closely to the original novel: which I although think is a plus. Good luck with the phone operator gig! (My usual phone answering speech is ear worming its way through my head: “My name is Insert Name Here, you’re through to Insert Company Here, how can we Insert Verb Here?”)
† I don’t think they filmed it, Debbi. But? The interview gets republished, every so often. Although I don’t know if that’s the one mentioned to in the Wikipedia entry about it!
Q1) The USSR Q2) 1991 Q3) No Q4) Kazakh Q5) Nur-Sultan (I always find this cities designed to be the capitals, rather than historically become the capitals, a bit weird, and this one on top of that has had more names than history, it seems). Oh, useful choice for me. One of my friends adopted a child from Kazakhstan, and although I read something about the place at the time, I can’t say I recalled much about it. (They wanted to adopt a Chinese girl, but it coincided with the time when they closed the borders to adoptions, so it was a long-drawn and heart-wrenching process). The boy is very handsome and loves them to bits (he knows where he comes from) and they get plenty of support, from psychologists, etc, but it is a complicated process, even when all goes well. The phone thing went pretty OK yesterday. I thought about you as well, and it’s tough work, even when people are kind and it’s for a good cause, like yesterday. The kind of job you used to do… Well, chapeau. I must say that by the end of the stint I was quite tired (and we only did 3 hours, although it was at the busiest time of the day), and with the strong lights my eyes had had enough. It was very noisy as well. We were almost 800 people answering phones at the same time, and even with an earplug for the other year it was buzzing (oh, and there were the cameras, and people coming and going, and the counts…) It seems that at the time of closing the programme, they had collected 9.4 millions of euros, so not bad (people have time to keep donating until the end of March, and many associations and companies had organised events for yesterday as well, so it might be a bit more). It was a nice thing to do and the atmosphere was pretty congenial. One of the callers suffered from one of those Minority illnesses herself, and she was very complimentary. It’s good to see people rallying around and willing to help. Well done on the cards! (A good soundtrack while writing them sure helps!)
I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?
I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.
Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.
Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.
Thank you.
* I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.
† Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.
Q1) The USSR
ReplyDeleteQ2) 1991
Q3) No
Q4) Kazakh
Q5) Nur-Sultan (I always find this cities designed to be the capitals, rather than historically become the capitals, a bit weird, and this one on top of that has had more names than history, it seems).
Oh, useful choice for me. One of my friends adopted a child from Kazakhstan, and although I read something about the place at the time, I can’t say I recalled much about it. (They wanted to adopt a Chinese girl, but it coincided with the time when they closed the borders to adoptions, so it was a long-drawn and heart-wrenching process). The boy is very handsome and loves them to bits (he knows where he comes from) and they get plenty of support, from psychologists, etc, but it is a complicated process, even when all goes well.
The phone thing went pretty OK yesterday. I thought about you as well, and it’s tough work, even when people are kind and it’s for a good cause, like yesterday. The kind of job you used to do… Well, chapeau. I must say that by the end of the stint I was quite tired (and we only did 3 hours, although it was at the busiest time of the day), and with the strong lights my eyes had had enough. It was very noisy as well. We were almost 800 people answering phones at the same time, and even with an earplug for the other year it was buzzing (oh, and there were the cameras, and people coming and going, and the counts…) It seems that at the time of closing the programme, they had collected 9.4 millions of euros, so not bad (people have time to keep donating until the end of March, and many associations and companies had organised events for yesterday as well, so it might be a bit more). It was a nice thing to do and the atmosphere was pretty congenial. One of the callers suffered from one of those Minority illnesses herself, and she was very complimentary. It’s good to see people rallying around and willing to help.
Well done on the cards! (A good soundtrack while writing them sure helps!)
Thank you so much for keeping these short! :)
ReplyDelete1. the Soviet Union
2. 1991
3. no
4. Kazakh and Russian
5. Nur-Sultan