I went into Romford, yesterday: to try and sell the laptop.
And got nowhere!
Quite what I’m going to do now … ?
I don’t know!
~≈🤨≈~
I’ve got to confess, I’m not especially religious: although I’ve found prayer useful, occasionally.
But … ?
I’m also very aware that the US sees religion differently to the UK.
Here, it’s usually seen as a private matter you generally don’t talk about.
Over there, it’s more openly discussed: although I don’t know if Debbi, my one regular comment, can confirm that.
At ANY rate? Religion in the States seems to be more openly discussed … and more openly involved with politics.
I know I still see the occasional reports of preachers, priests and pastors endorsing one side or another, one policy or another.
Most presidents seem not to want to discuss their particular beliefs: sensibly.
They want to appeal to as many voters as possible: whilst keeping an eye on the US First Amendment, the Constitutional amendment that mandates a separation of church and state.
But … ?
One thing that has come to my attention … ?
Is potential Presidential candidate, Donald Trump … is now selling copies of the Bible.
This, to me, is hugely offensive.
He’s doing this not out of any genuinely held beliefs … but to raise money for his political hopes, to pay off his court costs, and to dupe his Christian voters: to get them to vote for him by convincing them he’s a believer.
The man is a genuine villain: one that’s ignorant of a quote from Dune:
“When religion and politics travel in the same cart, the riders believe nothing can stand in their way. Their movements become headlong - faster and faster and faster. They put aside all thoughts of obstacles and forget [that] the precipice does not show itself to the man in a blind rush until it’s too late.”
And equally ignorant of John 2:15-16:
“15And when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the changers’ money, and overthrew the tables;
16And said unto them that sold doves, Take these things hence; make not my Father’s house an house of merchandise.”
Trump’s about the money: not the beliefs.
~≈📜≈~
Let’s move on, shall we?
Yesterday’s Teaser saw Mum*, Olga† and Debbi‡ putting in their answers: with Olga and Debbi scoring five out of five, and Mum on one!.
Let’s see how everyone does with today’s questions, shall we?
Q5)Finally … ? The Treaty of Florence was signed: on 28th March, 1801. It ended a war between France … and where: the Republic of Venice, the Papal States or the Kingdom of Naples?
† I have to admit, Olga: I had a disappointing day on the laptop front! The rain in Romford, didn’t help, either! We’ll have to see if I can still see it through Facebook. If I get any luck, there … … I’ll be very surprised!
You’re right: if they get Barcelona-Sants looking like that, it’ll look superb. But I get the impression it’ll be like many other public work: and take a while! (Brentwood Station’s on what’s now called the Elizabeth Line: building that seriously overran!)
‡ That it is, Debbi.
If it’s any consolation? The news reports have said the accident could have been caused by contaminated fuel: contaminated fuel that’s clogged up one of the engines, and knackered — sorry, ruined — the steering. I suspect, though, that we’ll only get definite results once any investigations are done. If it’s any help? The ship’s black box has been recovered: that should help …
Q4) Theresa May (it says 2017 not to 2016, though). https://www.gov.uk/government/news/the-united-kingdom-triggers-article-50
Q5) ‘Curry’ Oh. I have no doubt the works will take forever and I'd be surprised if they looked even close to that, but at the moment, it wouldn't take much to improve how it looks. We shall see. And, although I'm not particularly religious either, Amen to your comment on Trump.
I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?
I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.
Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.
Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.
Thank you.
* I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.
† Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.
1 Sth Africa
ReplyDelete2 1973
3 England
4 Tereasa May
5 Curry
Q1) Taiwan
ReplyDeleteQ2) 1973
Q3) England and Wales
Q4) Theresa May (it says 2017 not to 2016, though).
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/the-united-kingdom-triggers-article-50
Q5) ‘Curry’
Oh. I have no doubt the works will take forever and I'd be surprised if they looked even close to that, but at the moment, it wouldn't take much to improve how it looks. We shall see.
And, although I'm not particularly religious either, Amen to your comment on Trump.
Yes, about Trump. Why, dear Lord? Why?
ReplyDeleteWhy couldn't he have been on that bridge? :)
1. Taiwan
2. 1973
3. England and Wales
4. Theresa May
5. Curry