Yep: I’ve manage to tape Humans: and have it ripping as we speak.
~≈§≈~
Moving on, and keeping an extremely straight face?
I’m no legal expert: I’d defer to Old Peculiar regular, and recovering lawyer, Debbi Mack: who understands phrases like pro bono* and tort.
But I’ve had half an eye on the news that the EU parliament is to revise EU copyright law: in ways that seriously affect the way the internet works.
If I’ve understood things correctly? The two contentious parts of the regulations would means restricting what a person could link to: link or embed.
It would make my position as a blogger, very difficult, to give you an example. Again, if I’ve got it right, it would make the movie and tv reviews I write, difficult, as I couldn’t find a trailer or scene on line, that I could embed into a post.
That’s something I’d rather not go through, frankly.
The relevant decision of the EU parliament, yesterday? Was simply to delay things until September.
All I can hope? Is that the law is not passed.
I’d rather have a free hand in what I show you.
~≈§≈~
Let’s move on, shall we?
Yesterday’s Teaser saw Mr Strict†, Olga‡, Trevor^ and Debbiª putting in their answers: with Trevor, Olga and Debbi scoring five out of five, and Mr S scoring four.
Let’s see how everyone does with today’s questions, shall we?
* Tort, I couldn’t tell you. Pro bono — if I’ve understood things correctly — means that a lawyer, banker, or other such specialist, provides his/her services for free: because the case you’ve presented him is for the public good. It challenges a badly made law, it affects a lot of people who have no other legal defence, it concern a medical condition that affects a large number of people, what have you.
† Morning, Mr Sº! Thanks for looking in!
‡ I’ve got it taped, Olgaº. Now all I need to do is catch I’m Sorry, I Haven’t a Clue … !
^ Oh, I can watch it, online quite happily, Trevorº. But I can’t stream it from the browser on my Mac, to my AppleTV. And there’s no All Four app for the AppleTV: ITV, the BBC and Channel Five all do one. I could stream it from a recent model iOS device, to the AppleTV … if my iPod counted as recent …
ª Did I get Pro Bono right, there, Debbiº? He says … ! And, yes: that usually finishes quick! The last one, I got a bit different: I asked them what version of Windows I had on my Mac … … … … … … … … … … … … … ! I’ll keep my eye open for the post! :D (Rubber bands and duct tape? Come back Rube Goldberg, Heath Robinson’s getting ahead of you … )
Strictly speaking, a lawyer provides free legal services, aka, pro bono services, to people of limited means for the public good. The act of representing people with little or no means is supposed to be, in itself, for the public good. At least, as I understand the term.
I've heard about the copyright issue. I think it's probably okay to embed what you find on YouTube, because they're fairly strict about observing copyright law. And, I guess the EU doesn't have a "fair use" provision, as the US does? Or does it?
I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?
I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.
Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.
Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.
Thank you.
* I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.
† Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.
Q1) 1483
ReplyDeleteQ2) Tudor
Q3) Gloucester
Q4) tower
Q5) Peter Cook
Have a great Friday, Paul!
Strictly speaking, a lawyer provides free legal services, aka, pro bono services, to people of limited means for the public good. The act of representing people with little or no means is supposed to be, in itself, for the public good. At least, as I understand the term.
ReplyDeleteI've heard about the copyright issue. I think it's probably okay to embed what you find on YouTube, because they're fairly strict about observing copyright law. And, I guess the EU doesn't have a "fair use" provision, as the US does? Or does it?
1. 1483
2. Tudor
3. Gloucester
4. Tower
5. Peter Cook