Pages

Tuesday 31 January 2023

Nik Nak’s Daily Teaser — 31-1-2023 — The Van Allen Belt.

31st January, 2023: The Van Allen Belt.


Yes: it’s Tuesday.

And … ?

I’ve got my nephew, this afternoon.

Hopefully?

We’ll get some entertaining stuff done.

~≈†≈~

Let’s move on, shall we?

Yesterday’s Teaser saw Olga*, Mum† and Debbi‡ putting in their answers: with everyone scoring five out of five.

Let’s see how everyone does with today’s questions, shall we?

Here they are, along with the How To, License and video.

Q1)        The Van Allen Belt was discovered by a US satellite launched on 31st January.   Of which year of the 1950s?

Q2)        The satellite was called what: Sputnik 1, Explorer 1 or Prospero?

Q3)        The Belt, itself, is a what: magnetic belt, radiation belt or leather belt?

Q4)        The Belt is held in place by the Earth’s what: atmosphere, magnetic field or orbit?

Q5)        Finally … ?   The Belt protect the Earth’s what: atmosphere, magnetic field or orbit?
Here’s yesterday’s questions and answers … 

Q1)        Mahatma Gandhi was assassinated on 30th January: of which year of the 1940s?
A1)        1948.

Q2)        In which city: Mumbai, Kolkata or New Delhi?
A2)        New Delhi.

Q3)        Gandhi had a leader of which country’s independence movement: India’s, the USA’s or Indo-China’s?
A3)        India’s.

Q4)        The killer was a what: Muslim nationalist, Hindu nationalist or Jain nationalist?
A4)        Hindu nationalist.   (I suspect that — like many people who do this — he had very little to do with the religion he claimed to represent.)

Q5)        Finally … ?   Gandhi died: after being known as ‘Mahatma,’ for many years.   Mahatma means what: Great Souled, Great Purge or Great Dane?
A5)        Great Souled.
Here’s a thought … 
“The term Van Allen belts refers specifically to the radiation belts surrounding Earth; however, similar radiation belts have been discovered around other planets.”
From the Wikipedia Article on the Belts.
And a song …


Today’s questions will be answered in tomorrow’s Teaser.

Decisions about scores are final.

Thank you for coming: have a good day.





*        It’s always the way, Olga, isn’t it?   There’s jobs: but not necessarily one’s we can do!   (The UK government keeps talking about training: but I think it depends on what our case workers have on offer: and think is suitable … )

        Hello, Mum!

        Oh, yes!   I get the impression, Debbi, that one or two interviewers haven’t hired me for exactly that reason.   They might value experience: but I also think they value youth … because it’s cheaper!   Turning into Patrick Stewart could be helpful, there.
        But, getting off my high horse, here?   Yes, the franchise is doing VERY well: Picard 3 has some familiar faces in it, too.

3 comments:

  1. 1 1958, that was a good year!
    2 Sputnik 1
    3 Raduation Belt
    4 Magnetic field
    5 Atmosphere

    ReplyDelete
  2. Q1) 1958

    Q2) Explorer 1

    Q3) a radiation belt

    Q4) magnetic field (magnetosphere, it says)

    Q5) atmosphere
    I hope you have fun this afternoon with Jude. Send him my best. And let's keep our fingers crossed on the job front. (It's funny. Somebody saw un ad I've placed locally of my English lessons and called me, but she was looking for a place to offer her Math lessons herself!)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sounds interesting, but of course, we don't have access to it, so ...

    1. 1958
    2. Explorer 4
    3. radiation belt
    4. magnetic field
    5. atmosphere

    We've been watching a lot of Netflix and sometimes Peacock. It comes with our Comcast subscription.

    ReplyDelete

I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?

I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.

Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.

Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.

Thank you.

*   I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.

†   Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.