I mention it … because of something funny I saw on Facebook, yesterday.
I’m in a Star Trek group: where members post frequently.
One member told us of how he and his young daughter were at a convention.
Queuing up to get their picture taken with actress, Christina Chong: Security Chief La’an Noonien Singh, in other words.
Apparently? One of the daughter’s favourite episodes was “The Elysian Kingdom”: the one where — as the daughter put it — “the strong girl turned in to a princess!”
That … ?
Well, that put a smile on my face: especially as it’s a very good description of the character!
When’s she’s not holding a toy dog!
~≈Ë≈~
Let’s move on, shall we?
Yesterday’s Teaser saw Mum*, Olga† and Debbi‡ putting in their answers: with Olga scoring ten out of ten, Debbi on nine, and Mum on eight.
† It’s funny you should mention things that get stuck in drawers, Olga … ! (I’m half convinced Sir Terry must have had a bottle of Sant Sadurní d’Anoia at some point … !)
And you’re right: it would make for an interesting movie: it worked with King of Thieves, after all! (I should pencil in The Lavender Hill Mob, I know that: I’ve seen the original Lady Killers.)
‡ A habit of ten question sets, Debbi? Or sets about heists? :D At any rate, the next one’s on the 31st March.
Q5) promulgated I think any Ealing Comedy is worth a watch, Paul. I remember Passport to Pimlico with fondness, although it had nothing to do with crimes, although it makes one think...
Once again your scoring is wrong. It was a 10 question set and you said every one got five out of five. Well I make yesterdays scores 1 person on 10 points and 2 on 9 points. Check your work before releasing it.
Debbi got nine: as she got q9 wrong: mixing up Brazil — the defending champions — instead of England, the tournaments winner. (Brazil were the holders at the tournament: having won in ’62.)
Mum actually got eight: putting 1983 for q1, instead of 1966, and ‘blackmail letter’ for q7: rather than — as Olga and Debbi put — ‘ransom demand.’
I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?
I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.
Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.
Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.
Thank you.
* I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.
† Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.
Q1) 1804
ReplyDeleteQ2) France
Q3) civil laws
Q4) Napóleon Bonaparte
Q5) promulgated
I think any Ealing Comedy is worth a watch, Paul. I remember Passport to Pimlico with fondness, although it had nothing to do with crimes, although it makes one think...
Once again your scoring is wrong. It was a 10 question set and you said every one got five out of five. Well I make yesterdays scores 1 person on 10 points and 2 on 9 points. Check your work before releasing it.
ReplyDelete1 1804
ReplyDelete2 France
3 Civil laws
4 Napoleon Bonarparte
5 Promiugated
That’s where we were both wrong, Trevor!
ReplyDeleteDebbi got nine: as she got q9 wrong: mixing up Brazil — the defending champions — instead of England, the tournaments winner. (Brazil were the holders at the tournament: having won in ’62.)
Mum actually got eight: putting 1983 for q1, instead of 1966, and ‘blackmail letter’ for q7: rather than — as Olga and Debbi put — ‘ransom demand.’
Oh, you know how I feel about 10 question sets. :)
ReplyDeleteHeists are fine.
1. 1804
2. France
3. civil laws
4. Napoleon Bonaparte
5. promulgated
They follow the Napoleonic civil laws in Louisiana. Unsurprisingly, I guess. :)