Pages

Thursday 21 March 2024

Nik Nak’s Daily Teaser — 21-3-2024 — The Napoleonic Code.

21st March, 2024.


Yay!

It’s officially Thursday!

Or, at least, the day before pay day.

Frankly?

I’m looking forward to that: getting the bills done is something I can get done.

~≈Ë≈~

I’m on Facebook: as so many are.

I mention it, as I’ve an episode of Star Trek: Strange New Worlds on in the background.

Charades”, if you’re interested.

I mention it … because of something funny I saw on Facebook, yesterday.

I’m in a Star Trek group: where members post frequently.

One member told us of how he and his young daughter were at a convention.

Queuing up to get their picture taken with actress, Christina Chong: Security Chief La’an Noonien Singh, in other words.

Apparently?   One of the daughter’s favourite episodes was “The Elysian Kingdom”: the one where — as the daughter put it — “the strong girl turned in to a princess!”

That … ?

Well, that put a smile on my face: especially as it’s a very good description of the character!


When’s she’s not holding a toy dog!

 
~≈Ë≈~

Let’s move on, shall we?

Yesterday’s Teaser saw Mum*, Olga† and Debbi‡ putting in their answers: with Olga scoring ten out of ten, Debbi on nine, and Mum on eight.

The day also saw Trevor§ leaving us a message.

Let’s see how everyone does with today’s questions, shall we?

Here they are, along with the How To, License and video.

Q1)        The Napoleonic Code was adopted on 21st March.   Of which year: 1804, 1805 or 1806?

Q2)        Where was it adopted: Germany, France or Switzerland?

Q3)        The Code is a set of what: civil laws, military laws or health and safety regulations?

Q4)        It’s called the the Napoleonic Code as it’s named after the then First Consul.   Who was that Consul?

Q5)        Finally … ?   According to the opening section of the Code, laws could only be applied, if they’d been what: promulgated, partisan or pickled?
Here’s yesterday’s questions and answers … 

Q1)        20th March saw the theft of the Jules Rimet Trophy.   20th March of which year of the 1960s?
A1)        1966.

Q2)        Where was the trophy being displayed, at the time: New York, Paris.   London or Munich?
A2)        London.

Q3)        The trophy is usually handed to the winners of what: the Snooker World Championship, football’s World Cup, or the Grand National?
A3)        Football’s World Cup.

Q4)        The winged figure on the cup represented a Greek goddess.   Called what: Adidas, Nike or Reebok?
A4)        Nike. (Adidas were named after their founder, Adolf Dassler.   Reebok are named after an antelope.)

Q5)        That Greek goddess was the goddess of what: victory, sport, volcanoes or things that get stuck in drawers?
A5)        Victory.   (The goddess of things that get stuck in drawers is called Anoia.   She shares her name with a region of Catalonia …)

Q6)        The trophy is named after a president of what: the International Billiards and Snooker Federation, FIFA, the USA or the Jockey Club?
A6)        FIFA.

Q7)        The day after the trophy was stolen, relevant authorities received a what: ransom demand, blackmail letter or letter bomb?
A7)        Ransom demand.

Q8)        The trophy was found on the 27th March.   By a dog called what: Snuffles, Ruffles, Nobby or Pickles?
A8)        Pickles.

Q9)        The trophy was returned to the organisers of that year’s tournament.   Who won the tournament, that year: England, Brazil, West Germany or Italy?
A9)        England.

Q10)        Finally … ?   The Cup was stolen again in which year of the 1980s?
A10)        1983: it was never recovered.
Here’s a thought … 
“The code, with its stress on clearly written and accessible law, was a major milestone in the abolition of the previous patchwork of feudal laws.”
From the Wikipedia entry on the Code.
And a video …


Today’s questions will be answered in tomorrow’s Teaser.

Decisions about scores are final.

Thank you for coming: have a good day.



*        Hello, Mum!

†        It’s funny you should mention things that get stuck in drawers, Olga … !   (I’m half convinced Sir Terry must have had a bottle of Sant Sadurní d’Anoia at some point … !)
        And you’re right: it would make for an interesting movie: it worked with King of Thieves, after all!   (I should pencil in The Lavender Hill Mob, I know that: I’ve seen the original Lady Killers.)


        A habit of ten question sets, Debbi?   Or sets about heists?   :D   At any rate, the next one’s on the 31st March.

§        Cheers, Trevor!

5 comments:

  1. Q1) 1804

    Q2) France

    Q3) civil laws

    Q4) Napóleon Bonaparte

    Q5) promulgated
    I think any Ealing Comedy is worth a watch, Paul. I remember Passport to Pimlico with fondness, although it had nothing to do with crimes, although it makes one think...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Once again your scoring is wrong. It was a 10 question set and you said every one got five out of five. Well I make yesterdays scores 1 person on 10 points and 2 on 9 points. Check your work before releasing it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. 1 1804
    2 France
    3 Civil laws
    4 Napoleon Bonarparte
    5 Promiugated

    ReplyDelete
  4. That’s where we were both wrong, Trevor!

    Debbi got nine: as she got q9 wrong: mixing up Brazil — the defending champions — instead of England, the tournaments winner. (Brazil were the holders at the tournament: having won in ’62.)

    Mum actually got eight: putting 1983 for q1, instead of 1966, and ‘blackmail letter’ for q7: rather than — as Olga and Debbi put — ‘ransom demand.’

    ReplyDelete
  5. Oh, you know how I feel about 10 question sets. :)

    Heists are fine.

    1. 1804
    2. France
    3. civil laws
    4. Napoleon Bonaparte
    5. promulgated

    They follow the Napoleonic civil laws in Louisiana. Unsurprisingly, I guess. :)

    ReplyDelete

I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?

I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.

Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.

Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.

Thank you.

*   I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.

†   Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.