† Oh, that’s how it works, Olga: it sounds like a sensible way of doing things.
Doing by the Wikipedia entry? It looks like chap behind Dragon Ball put in a lot of work put in a lot of work. That sort of thing always impresses me.
Hmmm … It seems a shame about the JK Rowling situation¶. I know her views aren’t necessarily popular … but vandalism and snippy comments aren’t necessarily the way to go about these things.
‡ 🤣 At any rate, Debbi, Alan Moore’s — Watchmen, V for Vendetta, Halo Jones — birthday is in November: the man was very influential, so a ten question set is sorely tempting.
§ The mildly shocking thing about that video … ? Was that I hadn’t realised — until I saw the video, yesterday — that one of the backing singers was Kirsty MacColl! She wasn’t on the original recording, but would do the duty when Joan played live,
¶ I’m vaguely reminded of Eric Gill, Olga: his Gill Sans font is still one of the most used, and readable, fonts on the market. Despite the fact his offences are greater than Rowling’s: by a long shot.
Q5) Master I think it would be extremely difficult (and possibly quite boring as well) if we were only to enjoy or allow people who always behave in an appropriate manner and who hold opinions that are not offensive to anybody to engage in the creative arts. Art has always had something revolutionary and original about it, and it has managed to change people's minds more than once. And artists' creations should perhaps be allowed to stand independently from the people who created them. Otherwise we'll end up like in Fahrenheit 451, destroying everything. (I can't remember if I told you I was working on a chapter for a book about David Mamet, the playwright, screenwriter and film director I wrote my thesis about. Well, he was a liberal when he was younger, but he's progressively shared more and more right wing views. So, after an interview where he said some pretty nasty things, they decided not to publish the book. And, although I don't know if my chapter would have made it into the book or not, I spent more than a year working on it, reading about it, I bought books to update the chapter I'd written for my thesis... All for nothing).
I love it when someone comments. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?
I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.
Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively grown up. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.
Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.
Thank you.
* I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.
† Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable. I also like seeing folks webpages.
1 Union flag
ReplyDelete2 Red
3 Civilian
4 George 5th
5 Master
Q1) The United Kingdom
ReplyDeleteQ2) red
Q3) civilian
Q4) George 5th
Q5) Master
I think it would be extremely difficult (and possibly quite boring as well) if we were only to enjoy or allow people who always behave in an appropriate manner and who hold opinions that are not offensive to anybody to engage in the creative arts. Art has always had something revolutionary and original about it, and it has managed to change people's minds more than once. And artists' creations should perhaps be allowed to stand independently from the people who created them. Otherwise we'll end up like in Fahrenheit 451, destroying everything. (I can't remember if I told you I was working on a chapter for a book about David Mamet, the playwright, screenwriter and film director I wrote my thesis about. Well, he was a liberal when he was younger, but he's progressively shared more and more right wing views. So, after an interview where he said some pretty nasty things, they decided not to publish the book. And, although I don't know if my chapter would have made it into the book or not, I spent more than a year working on it, reading about it, I bought books to update the chapter I'd written for my thesis... All for nothing).
And here we go ...
ReplyDelete1. the UK
2. red
3. civilian
4. George 5th
5. captain or master