Showing posts with label Ian Fleming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ian Fleming. Show all posts

Thursday, 23 December 2021

No Time to Die — A Review

22nd December, 2021.






I’ll be frank: I made that introductory video, yesterday.

When, indeed, I’d had homemade spaghetti bolognese.

Although I don’t think anyone who’s genuinely  Italian would know what they’re looking at!

Tonight, on the other hand?

I had fish and chips.   Just to be different.

The intention’s much the same.

Have something to eat, then watch a movie … and then tell you about it: tomorrow night, at the latest.

Now, if you’ll excuse me?

I’m going to take the teabag out of the mug and watch No Time To Die.


~≈M≈~

Tuesday, 28 May 2019

Nik Nak’s Daily Teaser — 28-5-2019: Fleming!

28th May, 2019.


Yes, it’s true. 

Occasionally?

I read a book, or two.

And have to confess that my bedtime reading, at the moment … ?

Is Ward Moore’s1953  Bring the Jubilee.

I’m about four chapters into the alternative history novel.

And frankly?   It’s rather good.

To the point where I’m hearing the main character, Hodge Backmaker, talk.

At least, I’m hearing him talk, while I’m reading it: in what sounds like a late nineteenth century southern US citizen.

If I’m hearing the characters talk*?

That’s writing … !

~≈§≈~

Monday, 28 May 2018

Nik Nak’s Daily Teaser — 28th May, 2018

28th May, 2018.


Can I make a confession, at this point?

That I’m no political philosopher.

I’m just someone who has opinions on things.

I should get paid more per hour, is one.

Cheese is ok, but only on a burger. 

On a more serious note?   I think leaving the European Union is a bad move … that the Iraq War that Blair and Bush authorised was a bad move … 

And that access to abortions — terminations, if you want the less emotive name — is, if not a fundamental human right, then certainly a procedure that should be available to all.

Without hindrance: and regardless of my opinion.

I believe it should be available in several circumstances.

When the mother’s health — mental or physical — is in danger, when the foetus isn’t viable, when the woman has been raped, or when the pregnancy is a product of sexual abuse.

Yes: I’m aware that various forms of contraception can prevent things reaching the need for a termination … but also aware people can forget to take the pill, and that condoms split.

And that sometimes, we’re too drunk — or enthusiastic — to bother wearing a condom.

I’m aware — from some of the women I’ve spoken to — that’s it’s not the easiest procedure, emotionally, to undergo.

But, like them, feel it’s needed: and should be — as here in the UK — legislated for, and practised by trained medical personnel.

Whether a woman wants one?   Is a whole other matter.   But feel it should be available to her, should she feel it’s a needed option.

~≈§≈~

As I’m sure you’re aware, the Republic of Ireland — a famously Catholic country that forbade abortions in it’s constitution — has had a referendum on whether it should allow the procedure.

With a two thirds majority voting in favour of allowing it.

Good for them.

I’m VERY aware that, in light of that referendum, people are asking why Northern Ireland — part of the island of Ireland, after all, as well as part of the UK — is still the only part of the UK that forbids abortions.

Forcing many who needed one to the mainland, in order to legally get one.

The republic’s decision to allow the procedure?   Again, gives those woman a further option.

I’m also of the opinion that Northern Ireland’s laws on the subject should be nearer to those of both the mainland, AND the Republic.

Something that’s been highlighted by the Referendum.

Right at the moment?

There are calls for MPs at Westminster to force the issue through.

This is where I start to have problems.

Yes: I feel Northern Ireland’s laws should match the rest of the UK.

But, to the best of my own (limited) knowledge?

This is a devolved matter: one that should be handled by the currently suspended Northern Irish Assembly, rather than by Westminster.

Getting Westminster to force the issue?

Will do several things.

Will seriously affect the ability of the Assembly to function: as and when it resumes.

And sets a precedent for overruling the authority of the other devolved assemblies in the UK: allowing Westminster to ignore the Scottish Parliament and the Welsh Assembly.

And thus the will of the people.

I think Northern Ireland needs to reform its laws.

But that this needs doing by the Assembly, not Westminster.

Westminster doing it?   Would be damaging democracy.

~≈§≈~

Saturday, 28 May 2016

Nik Nak’s Daily Teaser — 28-5-2016

Oh, but I hate late night working!

I finished at ten, last night, and I think I’m still feeling a bit … you know … 

Bleaugh … !

It’s going to get fun, today, I think: I’m on a 12 ’til 9.

I hate those long shifts.

The upside?

The upside, as I keep telling people, is that I can now afford an expensive Amazon habit … !

~≈fl≈~

Oh, before I move on … ?

Did I mention my kid sister, Ruth?

She’s taking part in the Race For Life, a Cancer UK fundraising event, today.

I’m going to thank Old Peculiar regulars, Olga — who’s happily donated — and Debbi — who’s shared the event on Facebook.

And ask that if you want to donate?   (Ruth’s at £110: some 75% of her target of £150, so you know.)

If you do want to donate, you can do so, here … 


Every penny … 


~≈fl≈~

Monday, 5 October 2015

The Daily Teaser — 5-10-2015: The Name’s Bond … 

Right … 

Did you see where I put my iron … ?

More to the point, did you see where I put my posh trousers?

I think I’m going to need both, frankly … !

“OK,” I hear you ask.

“Why DOES Paul want me to find his trousers?”

Well … 

I’ve got an interview, today: at my local post office.

Which, of course means, I’ll be needing my posh shoes and trousers.   And need an iron, so I can iron a shirt.

Oh … 

And will possibly need to print out a copy of my CV and references.   I just hope the printers at the library are working, today.

I think I’m going to need them … 

~≈Ê≈~

Monday, 12 August 2013

The Daily Teaser — 12-8-2013: The Name’s Fleming

It’s got to be said, I love Radio Four at this time of the morning.

Really.

The Today programme’s usually insightful, the religious programming at this time surprisingly soothing to an agnostic, and the news bulletins have set the basic format for the BBC for years.

And it’s got to be said, Today has just played a blinder, as far as I’m concerned.   They’ve just had the ever garrulous — and ever passionate — comedian and mental health activist, Ruby Wax, on speaking about GPs overprescribing antidepressants.

Fascinating listening, I should add.   And very worth a listen, if you get the chance.

With that in mind … ?

Let’s move on … 

~≈§≈~

Yesterday’s Teaser was another quiet day.

So let’s see who’s up for trying today’s Ian Fleming themed questions, shall we?

Here they are, along with the ‘How To’, License and video … 

Q1) 12th August saw the death of Ian Fleming, creator of James Bond.   What was the name of the first James Bond novel … ?
Q2) Bond is — famously — a member of Britain’s Secret Service: which is also known as what … ?
Q3) Fleming, himself, on the other hand, served with which intelligence operation, during World War 2 … ?
Q4) What was the name of Fleming’s one children’s novel … ?
Q5) Fleming’s Jamaican home has a James Bond movie named after it.   Which James Bond movie … ?
Q6) And finally … What was the last James Bond novel to be published during Fleming’s lifetime … ?
Here’s yesterday’s questions and answers …
Q1) 11th August, 1804, saw Francis 2nd named as the first Emperor of where … ?
A1) Austria.
Q2) More to the point, which title did he hold, until 1806 … ?
A2) Holy Roman Emperor.
Q3) Francis 2nd was ALSO the Apostolic King of which ‘H’ … ?
A3) Hungary.
Q4) Which language is the main one, spoken in Francis 2nd’s country … ?
A4) German.
Q5) And finally … In which year did Francis 2nd die … ?
A5) 1835.
Enjoy those: I’ll leave you with Fleming’s own suggested recipe for Bond’s signature tipple† …
“‘A Dry Martini*’, he said. ‘One. In a deep champagne goblet.’ ‘Oui, monsieur.’ ‘Just a moment. Three measures of Gordons, one of vodka, half a measure of Kina Lillet. Shake it very well until it’s ice-cold, then add a large thin slice of lemonpeel. Got it?’ ‘Certainly, monsieur.’ The barman seemed pleased with the idea.”
From Casino Royale.
And … 

Well, if you’ve done a Teaser about Fleming, what other tune can one use … ? Do-do-DAH-do … 









*        Noel Coward’s martini recipe was ‘filling a glass with gin then waving it in the general direction of Italy’.

†        Fleming dubbed it the ‘Vesper’.

Tuesday, 31 March 2009

Casino Royale: You know My Name …


Phew; A mid-week movie night … !

And what a movie to have …

As you know, by now, something of a cheap night in for me, Adrian, Paul and/or Allison – and whoever else would care to join us – is catching a film on DVD.

There’s advantages to this over a cinema trip, although that’s nice.

It is cheaper: and those of us who smoke, can of course smoke indoors …

Which is possibly beside the point,

At Any rate, tonight’s film was the 2006 EON Productions version of Casino Royale.

Which is a bit special, to say the least.

For a start?   It has more than a grain of the the original Ian Fleming plotlineº to it.

Considerably more than many other of the Eon movies, from what I’m given to understand.

I should know; it’s one of the few of the Fleming originals I’ve read.

There’s minor updates to the plot: the world has moved on since the late 1950s, when the novel was published*.

But, essentially, what one sees on screen is justified by what’s in the text.

Making this a rare Bond film, sharing that distinction with – to the best of my knowledge – only a few of the earlier entries in the franchise; most notably On Her Majesty’s Secret Service.  

The Bond with the one and only appearance of George Lazenby in the central rôle, in case you’d forgotten.

The other reason I mention the latter, is it does share some similarities, although I feel these may be minimal.   The big one – something I’m sure many will know by now – is that, in both movies, there’s a doomed love interest.   The other worth mentioning, is the look and feel.

Both Casino Royale and On Her Majesty’s Secret Service have a gritty feel to them, although that’s more noticeable with Casino.

A sign of the times, I think, and one that, to me is welcome.   It reminds us of exactly what James Bond is;  a well educated, intelligent, well-educated killer.

Charming, capable of hurt, possessing a tender side.

But a killer, none the less

We tend to forget that, given most Bond movies lighter touches.

But, none the less, Casino Royale is exactly that: a Bond film, one that show us the darker, edgier side to the character, and that strips out the conventional formula parts that we’ve been used to, in order to wind the clock back, and breathe life into the franchise.

Complete with the tradition chases – a fun to watch Freerunning sequence – gadgets – although these are kept to the bare minimum, and there’s no Q to hand them over – and one hell of a car crash.

I can’t believe they did that to a DB12!

And the familiar “My names Bond … James Bond” is used right at the very end.

An ending that left Adrian, Paul, and I wanting to see Quantum of Solace …








* And I should add, since the making of the 1954 TV version, and the 1967 film with David Niven.

º Don’t even ask about The Man With The Golden Gun.   There’s a certain character in the film, who’s definitely NOT in the book …