Showing posts with label Metropolis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Metropolis. Show all posts

Tuesday, 10 January 2017

Nik Nak’s Daily Teaser — 10-1-2016

Just in case you’re reading me, here, but not following on Twitter?

You’ll possibly know I’ve had router trouble.

I finally managed to send the old HomeHub3 back, yesterday: having found a large enough box to put it — and the modem it needed to interact with my fibre optic connection — in.

You’ll possibly realise I managed to trudge up to Brentwood High Street, yesterday: print out the relevant label, tape it to the box, and cart box, label and carcass, over to the post office.

I did shopping.   I wandered around, window shopping.

I wondered home.

And, in a bureaucratically skewed move worthy of Brazil and Paranoia … 

Found BT had sent me a second new router … 

Oy … 

Veh … 

~≈Ê≈~

Wednesday, 6 February 2013

Metropolis: Head, Heart and Hands … 

6th February, 2013

There comes a point when — literally —  you have to sit down with a classic or two.

I’ve always prided myself on being something of a science fiction fan, so for me, that means sitting down with a vintage classic or two.

Including — back in the late 1970s, when it was re-shown at my local cinema, post-Star Wars2001: A Space Odyssey.

That’s an experience, I should add.   Catching Kubrick’s work on the big screen is something of a delight: which ever one of his films you see.

2001 is pretty good.   Watching it on a TV — however hi-definition/widescreen that TV is — isn’t quite the same.

But I was saying about classics, wasn’t I … ?   Yes, I was …

~≈†≈~

You see, there’s a school of thought that says — every-so-often — you should make a point of seeing those films that generally feature on bucket* lists: in other words, they’re the sort of film to see before you die.

God alone knows how many of those there are.   I’m willing to bet that if you ask one hundred people for the title of just one such film … you’ll get about three hundred suggestions.

It possibly gets easier if you narrow things down by specifying a genre.   Even then, you’ll, probably still get an argument.

Especially if the genre in question is something like science fiction: complete with Star Wars at one end, Bladerunner at another, and — keep with me — Star Trek at a third end.   Oh, and the original Russian version of Solaris, along with 2001: A Space Odyssey forming a fourth and fifth end to a multidimensional stick.

Things like Weird Science floating around, give people tension headaches.

The less said the better, there, I think.

At any rate … ?   I managed to rent one of those films that’s been seen as a classic.

If not a classic: then certainly genre defining.

The 1927, Fritz Lang film, Metropolis.

Let me try and explain, shall I … ?


~≈†≈~