Saturday, 5 June 2010

A Starry Starry Night …

*Spoilers*


You know, I think — think — I’m quietly impressed with Vincent and The Doctor, tonight’s episode of Dr Who.

Seriously.

It’s …

Well …

Where on earth do I start … ?

Vincent and The Doctor — by Four Weddings and A Funeral and Blackadder writer, Richard Curtis — sees the Dr and Amy seeing something unexpected in Vincent van Gogh’s The Church at Auvers.

Something they don’t expect …

Something that they decide have to travel back in time — to meet Vincent, himself — to ask about …

Something that, as it turns out, only Vincent can see.

•••••

Now, here’s where I’ve got to admit, I’m impressed, tonight.

Well …

Impressed is maybe the wrong word …

Maybe stirred’s the word …

Yes.

In part, because Vincent and The Doctor doesn’t fill part of the series 5 story arc. Sometimes an episode doesn’t have to, I think.

Which was a nice change of pace.

What Richard Curtis has done with Vincent and the Doctor is to come up with an episode that changes the pace of the series, by showing us Amy and the Doctor worrying not about changing the world, not about saving the universe, but simply trying to solve a puzzle.

And offer some help.

And trying to work out what to do about the invisible creature that’s plaguing a person who’s already badly tortured.

Know anything about Vincent Van Gogh … ?

I’ve got to confess, I don’t.

Or much, at any rate.

Beyond the basics that I think everyone’s aware of: that he wasn’t much appreciated, whilst alive, and that he struggled for many years with (still undiagnosed) mental illness.

Was — from the impression I picked up, over the years — the almost archetypal tortured artist.

And here’s where I think I’ve got stirred.

Firstly, simply by being stirred enough to actually want to look up Van Gogh’s work and life on the ’net, while I’ve been writing this post.

And secondly, honest enough to admit that I was very taken with Tony Curran’s work as Vincent, himself.

There’s an old saying that an actor’s only as good as his or her script.

Not a problem with Vincent and The Doctor, I think. Not with a Richard Curtis script, at any rate …

Then you’ve got to factor in direction, set building, what have you …

But there’s times when you’ve got to give an actor credit, and I’ve got to give it to Tony Curran, tonight.

There’s a scene, towards the end of Vincent and The Doctor, where the Dr and Amy take Vincent forward in time, to see his own work — work he feels compelled to do, and yet feels is totally worthless — in Paris.

I think if anyone has given us a lesson, tonight, in how a person that tortured, that suicidal, that anguished, can be given a brief moment of joy …

Then it’s Tony Curran, in Vincent and The Doctor.


That puts Vincent and The Doctor somewhere near the top of the classics of the new series list.











6 comments:

Michelle said...

I loved the episode, and am also a great admirer of the work of Van Gogh....made me cry when they took Vincent to the gallery, and yes, the actor playing him was amazing at conveying just the right sense of awe and gratitude; it would have been all too easy to overplay the 'madness' which I'm sure everyone nowadays would recognise as depression.
Just a beautiful episode

Nik Nak said...

Spot on, there, Michelle: I think both Richard Curtis, in writing this episode, and Tony Curran — who played van Gogh — pitch Vincent’s mental at exactly the write level.

And that Matt Smith and Karen Gillan managed to keep up, beautifully well!

Shi'aanon Iaya said...

Excellent review, and I agreeon most every point. Especially the sudden and unexplainable ugre to search up information on Van Gogh. I'd also have to agree with Michelle on the BRILLIANCE of the acting in that episode. Almost beyond compare throughout the modern Doctor.

On a technical note, though, from one writer to another, I notice the phrase "I think" a whole slew too much. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's your blog, thus most things you say are going to be what "[you] think".

Not a criticism, just an observation from a purely grammatical standpoint.

Keep up the good work!
** Share & Enjoy! **
~ Halo "Foxboy"

Nik Nak said...

FoxBoy, you’re right, I do tend to over use the phrase … !

But having someone put in some constructive criticism … ?

That’s much appreciated!

graham said...

i also very much enjoyed this episode. it was cool of the leads to take a more backseat role than usual to allow a great character to be examined with more depth. DW has sometimes used cartoon versions of historical figures and Van Gogh was represented fully and roundly. it did have, as you say, a different pace to the majority of episodes this series and was welcome for these reasons.

Nik Nak said...

Graham, you’re right, I’m thinking the change in pace is definitely a good thing … !!