data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ec82/1ec82826950db1f839f8a182505d8d3583c5cf32" alt=""
Ooh, I’ve been at it, again … !
Emailing the Gazette, before you ask … !!
I’ll be honest, I was lurking around on Facebook, this afternoon, and happened to notice that Councillor Chilvers had posted up something from her blog.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19da8/19da8d96e867cb731ace5a5f5ff559fd4f35a6ec" alt=""
Which, obviously, got me looking at the Gazette for something other than jobs, or stuff about Rollason Way.
For once …
Basically, it seems Brentwood Council are reporting on the £12, 000 consultation of plans for Brentwood High Street.
Hmmm …
Well, I think I made my views, clear, with this …
Dear Sir,
Hang on, £12, 000 on a ‘consultation’ … ?
Now, I’ve GOT to confess, I read your article about the £12, 000 consultation for Brentwood’s High Street — in the SAME issue as the report on how much council tax payers money is spent on temporary council workers and the closure of three community halls — and I’m starting to wonder exactly what our local council — both councillors and council executives — are doing with our money?
I’m mean, I’ve got to ask if, instead of wasting that money on more consultants fees, they thought of maybe putting a few new paving slabs down along Warley Hill. Or maybe — just maybe — keeping the Old House, Keys Hall and Merrymeade House open a year or two longer?
Or maybe spending a bit more, so the benefits of Brentwood High Street are highlighted for everyone, and not just a wealthy few?
I’ve really only got one conclusion, at the moment: and that is that the various new developments of flats that are causing so much protest — from me, and many others — are the only way the Council has, to raise more council tax money to waste.
After all, it‘s not like they’re spending what they’ve on anything useful, now is it … ?
Paul Downie.
Nik Nak’s Old Peculiar.
Here’s hoping they print it … !!
‹‹‹~›››
No comments:
Post a Comment