Wednesday, 15 December 2010

Emails, and Appeals …

Pointless piece of trivia for you, here …

Did you know it’s — as I write — 13:25 in Los Angeles … ?

You didn’t … ?

Neither did I, ’til I had a look at one of me clocks …

««•»»

Which wasn’t exactly what I had in mind, when I started writing this …

I get mildly distracted, when I’m tired: you can tell, can’t you … ?

At any rate, bless ’er, I had Councillor Chilvers wonder into the shop, earlier: mostly yo have a mosey around and to say ‘Hi’.

I don’t think any of the stock caught her eye.

But she was certainly impressed enough to tweet about it!!

And leave me with a bit of a hot tip: seemingly, the planned development that had been refused in Fairfield Road — for more flats, so you know — is being appealed by the developers.

Sounds about right, given Brentwood Council’s history …

Hopefully, though … ?

It’s something I hope gets turned down: that boxing gym’s being eyed up by at three people I know.

«•»

Moving on … ?

Moving on, I’ve got to admit, I’ve been emailing the Gazette, again: mostly in annoyance at Eric Pickles’ column: about tuition fees, so you know.

Here’s what I told them …
Dear Sir,

I’ve got to admit, I’m writing after reading Eric Pickles column, in this weeks Gazette.

And admit, as I’ve written in my blog, I’m a disillusioned Lib-dem voter.

Now, I don’t have access to any of the government figures showing the university tuition fee — or the cap on the Educational Maintenance Allowance — as he does.

But my two younger sisters are both university graduates: ones still in debt as a result of things as they stand.

I think both they — and the law abiding students who’ve been peacefully protesting — wouldn’t call what he’s calling “the truth about fees”, a good thing.

And can only hope the current coalition government are voted out at the next election. After making a travesty of our childrens’ futures. And one too many blatantly broken promises.
Here’s hoping that gets published …




No comments:

Post a Comment

I love it when people comment. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?

I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.

Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively adult. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.

Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.

If you can also leave you comments on today’s Teaser Video, that would be good.

Thank you.

*   I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.

†   Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable: as are Bluesky or Mastodon links. I also like seeing folks webpages.