Showing posts with label Christopher Ecclestone. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christopher Ecclestone. Show all posts

Monday, 9 July 2012

Blackout Episode 2: The Jury Got Bored


Hmmm …

Can I make a confession, here … ?

I’ve literally just turned off the television set, and switched on iTunes.

Partly because I like to have some music on, when I’m writing: and I’m in the mood for Amon Tobin’s Out From Out Where album seems to fit my mood at the moment .

But mostly where I’ve gotten more than a little unhappy with episode 2 of the 3-part BBC drama, Blackout.

Set in a nameless city, Blackout sees Christopher Eccleston as a corrupt local councillor who works out that he’s beaten someone to death, whilst drunk.

That first episode sees him then going to run: after heroically saving his sister from being shot, whilst ALSO being very honest about his addiction issues.

The little of episode 2, that I saw tonight … ?

Saw Demoys — the Ecclestone character — dealing with his initial days in office as mayor.

And ALSO having to confess what he’s done to his wife, Alex — an on form Dervla Kirwan — after she finds some incriminating evidence, hiding in the airing cupboard.

All this … ?

All this, and trying to deal with his alcoholism … 

‹‹•››

Now, I HAVE to admit, there’s a reason — possibly more than one — for me turning, off half way through.

Now, you’ve possibly realised I’ve been to the odd meeting of Brentwood Council’s planning committee, haven’t you … ?

And from what I’ve been told, by  both Councillors Chilvers and Kendall, local councils don’t have councillors who are full time paid employees: as the series seems to be implying Ecclestone’s character is.

Nor — again based on my own very limited experience* — is a mayor anything much more than a ceremonial role: or, at least, a casting vote in case of a tied council meeting.

Except in London, where Boris Johnson and his immediate predecessor, Ken Livingstone, had a HELL of a lot of influence on how the budget got spent.

So that rankled.

The other thing that got me … 

Hmm … 

Was the simple fact of the main character’s alcoholism.

Oh, it’s generally well — and sympathetically — handled, don’t get me wrong.

I found it easy to accept someone who’s come to realise that he’s killed someone in an alcoholic blackout, then taken a bullet in a fit of remorse.

You and I would be just as vulnerable.

But I’d also found it very hard to accept that that person would THEN stand for an important elected post.

Having seen a little of how rehab programs work, and having seen how the Liberal Democrats dealt with former, Charles Kennedy, I found that VERY tough to accept.

What’s more, on top of that … ?

On top of that, relationship between Demoys and the Russian nurse — also a recovering alcoholic, who’s trying to help — are nicely written, but flawed, I feel.

The little I know of how 12 step groups like Alcoholics Anonymous work, tell me that having a sponsor of the opposite sex is generally considered to be … well, let’s say it’s frowned on, and leave it at that.

‹‹•››

Now, to be fair … ?

To be fair, I’ve not seen ALL of the series: although it seems obvious to me that Episode 3 will see Demoy’s guilty secret coming out.


Either because of his’s victim’s daughter’s investigation, or through the work of the DI Bevanº character.

And, again, trying my best to be fair, the cast are all performing strongly: and the script, per se isn’t bad.

However, for me, personally, I’ve actually found it quite hard to suspend my disbelief, and keep watching Blackout.

As far as I’m concerned … ?

The series is a definite turn-off.

One I won’t be wasting more time on.
Blackout
☆☆☆☆













*        I’m hoping someone can maybe leave me a comment or two, to correct me if I’m wrong, here … 

º        Andrew Scott who played Moriarty in the recent BBC 1 series, Sherlock.

Monday, 2 July 2012

Blackout: Episode 1. The Jury’s Out


Hmm … 

I have a definite confession to make, here.

I usually am not the type of chap to watch a TV drama if it doesn’t have tentacles and aliens in it.

But I have to admit that I’ve just caught the first episode of the new political drama, Blackout with former Dr Who, Christopher Ecclestone in the main role.

And … 

Hmmm … 

I’m not sure I’m convinced … 

Episode 1 of Blackout sees Ecclestone playing Daniel Demoys, an hardboiled politician with a list of substance issues: one who, during an alcoholic blackout, beats a corrupt businessman to death.

And by the end of the episode … ?

Deciding to clean up his act and run for mayor.

‹‹•››

Hmmm … 

See what I mean about not convinced … ?

I’m LITERALLY going to leave this post right here … ?

Mostly where it’s late.

But in part … ?

Because Blackout hasn’t quite convinced me it’s worth writing about.

Not JUST yet: but here, I’ll let you judge.

Let me know what you think of this clip …


Sunday, 1 July 2012

28 Days Later: A Review

1st July, 2012.

It occurred to me, last night — after I’d finished watching a film — that I could happily not write about it, as I’d posted about it, before.

Where that post is, now, I don’t know!

Which is unfortunate: when you consider I’ve written about the sequel … !

That’s something I correct, right now … 

»»•««

Sunday, 30 August 2009

A Rose …

My word, the thing’s you start watching, when there’s nowt on TV …

Well, I got bored with stuff about Stalin …

Somewhere in my back catalogue of backed up bits & bobs is the very first episode of the new series of “Dr Who”.

Ageing fan that I am, I’ve got to confess, I fell in love.

Again …

Much as I had as a child …

Odd?

No odder than dressing up in a silly costume and singing strange songs of a weekend; much like many football fans …


I’ve got to admit, that comparison, between football and sci-fi fandom, is probably more valid than people realise.

Or that’s my thinking.

Now I’d grown up on the original series — the Tom Baker years, to be exact — and that was the exact point I’d made to my (then) boss, Pete, back in 2005.

He’d wanted some idea’s for getting people into the Hutton; and the fact that the BBC were making a very big deal about the opening episode.

So I’d suggested getting a bunch of friends and fellow fans in to watch it.

He was dubious.

But my point — apart from the début episode being shorter — was quite simple. How was it different from half a dozen or so Accrington Stanley fans turning up to watch a game.

He had to agree with me.

It’s just a shame I couldn’t manage to pull that off, but there we go.

But it kind of show’s you the level of expectation that was surrounding “Rose”.

Something I thought, on actually seeing it, was fully justified.

Rose” had a level of emotional maturity that I thought was very hard to find in most sci-fi serials of the 1970s and 80s. And definitely an improvement on the original.

One thing that struck me was the fact the Russell T Davis and the rest of the back-room gang had dug up both the Autons and the Nestene Consciousness.

And as a way of introducing the ongoing Time War thread that they’d written into the Doctor’s back story, had given the Consciousness a motivation for invading Earth; its homeworld had been destroyed in the War and it was blaming both the Doctor, and looking for a new place to live.

Something that the original series hadn’t done as well as it could.

But you don’t usually question these things, do you?

Not when you’re 7!

But that’s kind of my point, here, strange as it sounds.

The original — for me and many others — had magic to it.

Which “Rose”, for me, managed to re-capture.

I’ve been glued, ever since …