Showing posts with label abortion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abortion. Show all posts

Monday, 28 May 2018

Nik Nak’s Daily Teaser — 28th May, 2018

28th May, 2018.


Can I make a confession, at this point?

That I’m no political philosopher.

I’m just someone who has opinions on things.

I should get paid more per hour, is one.

Cheese is ok, but only on a burger. 

On a more serious note?   I think leaving the European Union is a bad move … that the Iraq War that Blair and Bush authorised was a bad move … 

And that access to abortions — terminations, if you want the less emotive name — is, if not a fundamental human right, then certainly a procedure that should be available to all.

Without hindrance: and regardless of my opinion.

I believe it should be available in several circumstances.

When the mother’s health — mental or physical — is in danger, when the foetus isn’t viable, when the woman has been raped, or when the pregnancy is a product of sexual abuse.

Yes: I’m aware that various forms of contraception can prevent things reaching the need for a termination … but also aware people can forget to take the pill, and that condoms split.

And that sometimes, we’re too drunk — or enthusiastic — to bother wearing a condom.

I’m aware — from some of the women I’ve spoken to — that’s it’s not the easiest procedure, emotionally, to undergo.

But, like them, feel it’s needed: and should be — as here in the UK — legislated for, and practised by trained medical personnel.

Whether a woman wants one?   Is a whole other matter.   But feel it should be available to her, should she feel it’s a needed option.

~≈§≈~

As I’m sure you’re aware, the Republic of Ireland — a famously Catholic country that forbade abortions in it’s constitution — has had a referendum on whether it should allow the procedure.

With a two thirds majority voting in favour of allowing it.

Good for them.

I’m VERY aware that, in light of that referendum, people are asking why Northern Ireland — part of the island of Ireland, after all, as well as part of the UK — is still the only part of the UK that forbids abortions.

Forcing many who needed one to the mainland, in order to legally get one.

The republic’s decision to allow the procedure?   Again, gives those woman a further option.

I’m also of the opinion that Northern Ireland’s laws on the subject should be nearer to those of both the mainland, AND the Republic.

Something that’s been highlighted by the Referendum.

Right at the moment?

There are calls for MPs at Westminster to force the issue through.

This is where I start to have problems.

Yes: I feel Northern Ireland’s laws should match the rest of the UK.

But, to the best of my own (limited) knowledge?

This is a devolved matter: one that should be handled by the currently suspended Northern Irish Assembly, rather than by Westminster.

Getting Westminster to force the issue?

Will do several things.

Will seriously affect the ability of the Assembly to function: as and when it resumes.

And sets a precedent for overruling the authority of the other devolved assemblies in the UK: allowing Westminster to ignore the Scottish Parliament and the Welsh Assembly.

And thus the will of the people.

I think Northern Ireland needs to reform its laws.

But that this needs doing by the Assembly, not Westminster.

Westminster doing it?   Would be damaging democracy.

~≈§≈~

Wednesday, 9 March 2011

Life and Choice

You know, I’ve got to admit, I think this is the first time — for quite some time — that I’ve not actually included a photo.

But …

Well …

I know some of my readers may find this contentious.

Adding a photo would be …

Well …

Definitely over-egging the pudding.

You see, I’ve just been chatting — via Twitter — with @kaijuisme, and found myself broadly in agreement with him on something.

We got nattering about a Republic Congressman — Bobby Franklin, if I’ve got the name and the House correct — who is trying to frame a law in Georgiaº to make miscarriage punishable with a death penalty.

Miscarriage, note.

I had to ask Kaiju if he was joking.

He wasn’t.

Which is when I got looking up news services … !

»»•««

Now, I know that the pro-choice/pro-life debate is one that causes a lot of arguments, over in the US.

It certainly has it’s share of yelling people, over here.

Personally … ?

Personally speaking, I’ve got to admit I’m reluctantly in favour of abortions*, however distasteful you or I may find them.

And believe me, I do.

But I’ve know many women over the years who’ve had at least one.

And however painful they’ve found them — from what I’m told, it’s not the easiest procedure to go through, emotionally — they’ve been able to explain exactly why they’ve felt it necessary to have it done.

For the most part, they’ve also gone onto to have families, happily, as and when the time has been right.

OK, they’ve felt regret over what happened. But also feel they’ve done the right thing.

I know I’ve been occasionally accused of incredible arrogance, sometimes.

But I’m not arrogant enough to tell someone facing THAT decision what to do.


Now, there’s a reason I’ve mentioned that.

Because the politician in question has tied that clause into a bill that calls for the death penalty for women who have medical or elective terminations.

And — as I think I mentioned — for spontaneous terminations. Miscarriages, in other words.

I have to ask one thing …

Has Bobby Franklin ever met a woman who’s had a miscarriage … ?

I don’t think he has, to be frank.

The ones I have … ?

Are on the wrong end of a natural process: one they neither desired or asked for.

And as far as I can tell, one they haven’t faked.

To even suggest that they who’ve already suffered what many women see as one of the worst things that can happen to anyone female … ?

Well …

I can only hope this chap gets kicked out of office.

Women don’t need a twit like him in office …









* I really don’t like the word, preferring instead, termination. Whatever one calls it, I’m still not a fan. HOWEVER, I am still — still — behind someone’s right to choose. It’s complicated, but ultimately boils down to this: there are always times it’s going to be needed, for whatever reason. I’m also aware that clinicians in the US have been murdered for carrying out abortions. Carrying out murder to back up your arguments … ? As far as I’m concerned, if the pro-life — AHEM — lobby feels the need to commit murder, then it has already lost.

º There’s something similar going on in Utah, it seems.