5th July, 2015.
Oh, now, wait, wait, wait … SLOW DOWN … !
No, hold, on …
Paul … ?
Start making sense to an audience, will you … ?
Sorry, Sorry, I’m …
Well, tired: and very aware I smell.
Of a mix of fried chicken, and the soap I used to have a shower when I got home, today.
Some sort of lime scented thing.
So I’m very aware I’m … going to appeal to people with very odd tastes.
Which is possibly the cue for some very smart remarks.
At any rate … ?
At any rate, I’ve just been watching the fourth episode of the Channel 4 series, Humans. And have to confess to finding it — in line with the previous episodes — to be a riveting piece of drama.
~≈Ù≈~
Just to briefly try and recap, shall we?
In previous episodes, we’ve been introduced to the Hawkins family. Mother, Laura, father, Joe, and their three children: Matilda, Toby and Sophie.
Last week’s episode saw Matilda — Mattie, Lucy Carless — trying to hack into the brain of Anita — the family synth, played by Gemma Chan — and getting a very strange reaction as a result.
Her mother, Laura — Katherine Parkinson — is concerned: but also trying to follow up a strange case at her work as a solicitor. A potential client has been turned down by the partners Laura works for.
The client wants to sue a theatre for kicking her and her synth out: and believes it to be a violation of her synth’s human rights.
In the meantime … ?
In the meantime, it’s POSSIBLY a good thing Laura was out.
She won’t — as things stand in today’s episode — know that husband, Joe …
Has managed to activate Anita’s ‘18+’ features: and … um … worked off some frustrations …
Yes, you can probably worked that bit out, yourself, can’t you … ?
~≈Ê≈~
In all this … ?
In all this, Mattie has managed to contact Leo — Colin Morgan — to see what she makes of him.
And managed to make a sneaky get-away, after confirming — with the help of a photo Leo shows her — that Leo is seriously interested in Anita.
Leo, and his synth, Max … ?
Do manage to find something, though.
Some sort of executable code, buried in the code posted by Mattie.
Something they manage to ask Dr Millican about: as he’d been involved with the original Synth building project.
He thinks it’s … harmless … but want’s to see what happens when the code is loaded into Max.
Which is when an increasingly uncomfortable Leo decides to leave: informing Dr Millican that he is, intact Leo Elster: son of the synths original designer, David Elster.
Dr Millican is intensely sceptical: he knows for a fact Leo … is dead …
In all this … ?
The fact Niska has found what Hobbs calls a Smash club — a club devoted to destroying Synths, fight club style — and has assaulted several of the audience, nearly goes by the wayside.
The fact DS Drummond has been kicked out by his wife, after his suspension and is staying at a work colleague who isn’t ALL she seems … ?
And that the Hawkins family tests of Anita show the Synth is 14 years old — rather than the two weeks they’d assumed — adds just another layer to the mix.
I don’t know about you, but I think Humans is getting good.
~≈Ê≈~
You’d disagree … ?
I don’t know if you do, or you don’t, actually: unless you leave me a comment.
Personally … ?
Personally, I’m finding Humans to be very watchable.
The characters — and the way both cast and writers present them — are engaging, realistic, examples of people: reacting to a very new and (potentially) scary technology in all-too-human ways.
Including the right-wing, ‘We Are People’ movement the episode shows us, tonight.
In both Niska and Anita … ? We ALSO have the most sympathetic take on Frankenstein’s Monster going.
Hopefully?
I’m hoping the series goes on, beyond this first one.
On the form I feel the show has, right now? Along with the mirror it holds up to how are interact with technology?
I think it certainly merits a long run.

No comments:
Post a Comment
I love it when people comment. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?
I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.
Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively adult. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.
Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.
If you can also leave you comments on today’s Teaser Video, that would be good.
Thank you.
* I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.
† Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable: as are Bluesky or Mastodon links. I also like seeing folks webpages.