18th October, 2026: Luke the Evangelist.
Right … I think panic or pickyness has done something!
Yes: it’s meant I’ve got up ten minutes before my alarm went off.
Which is mildly ironic.
I slept through it, yesterday … !
~≈⏰≈~
Yep: I officially had dinner with my nephew, last night.
After he made another video.
Feel free to hit the like button!
~≈🎥≈~
I follow the news, every-so-often.
You’d possibly guessed, haven’t you?
At any rate, something that floated across my attention, yesterday, was this piece: one that tells us an unnamed male celebrity is seeking to prevent publication of serious allegations by ITN and The Guardian.
Some of which are of a sexual nature.
Medical evidence submitted by the man says that he will attempt “… to take his own life”.
Hmmm …
I can understand someone not wanting to be named in these sorts of proceedings.
But … ?
I would also say that threatening suicide in this situation is …
Is an attempt to blackmail the court into behaving as the celebrity wants: rather than in the interest of a public who’d feel it should be reported … as a prelude to the man’s trial for whatever he’s done.
OK: if the unnamed celebrity is already undergoing trial, himself, I can understand a non-publication injunction happening.
Reports like this could prove prejudicial to someone’s defence.
But to ban publication because “I’ll kill myself if you do”?
Strikes me as an attempt to silence the press, as an attempt at blackmail … and just downright offensive.
~≈📰≈~





