Showing posts with label Laurence Fishburne. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Laurence Fishburne. Show all posts

Tuesday, 13 August 2024

Nik Nak’s Daily Teaser — 13-8-2024 — International Left Hander’s Day

13th August, 2024: International Left Hander’s Day.


It’s officially official: it’s International Left Hander’s Day.

Which means … ?

If you’re a fellow southpaw that’s reading this, you’re allowed to swap the buttons around on the family laptop.

Oh … and put the left handed kitchen scissors in the top of the drawer: so right handers pick them up first!

This is not a day for revolution.

It’s a day to tell right handers how it feels*!

~≈👉🏻≈~

On a more serious note … ?

I’ve got a formal hearing, today: over whether I’m due Personal Independence Payment, or PIP.

I am nervous.

Understandably, I think.

I’ve had some helpful advice from a couple of friends.

But … ?

Am still nervous.

I never know if I will get extra help: nor, if I do, how much help.

I don’t know for sure … but I think it was a well known Australian Dr Who girl† who said that ‘if’ was the biggest word in the English language.

~≈👉🏻≈~

Tuesday, 28 June 2016

Event Horizon — Still DAMN good!



28th June, 2016.

You know, I’ve — currently — got some free time on the go, right now.

I’m not complaining.

Really.

It lets me get on with some stuff I want to do: writing, mostly, but a little shopping, as well.

Including a blu-ray.

Now, you’re going to be thinking two things, aren’t you?

Why on earth didn’t you just rent the film from iTunes, as you usually do?   

Well, frankly, I didn’t have enough credit in my iTunes account.

And frankly?   Some of the specials that came with the disc look impressive.

OK, that’s maybe not an excuse to go seeing Event Horizon again.

But when a film’s this good, I want every excuse I can.

~≈Â≈~

Tuesday, 10 December 2013

Man Of Steel: Impressively Messianic … 

9th December, 2013.

You know, I’m — and I swore I try and keep the use of the next word down — impressed.

Quite heftily so, in .fact.

You see with some of the last bit of iTunes credit I’ve had, I’ve rented a film, tonight: the 2013, Zack Snyder take on DC’s flagship hero, Superman, and I’m thinking it may not be stunning … 

But IS something I wish I had the money to buy on DVD.

I feel it may well be worth sitting down with, again.

It’s ALSO something I’m going to sleep on: it’s getting late.   Either way, I’ll back in the morning … !

~≈Ì≈~
10th December, 2013.

Right … 

Now I’ve got that sleep I was wanting, … ?   Let me tell you about Man Of Steel.

As I think I said, last night, I had a quiet night to myself, last night.   Quiet: with nothing to do, nothing on TV, and just enough money on my iTunes account to rent a film.

The film in question, of course, being the 2013, Zack Snyder directed, Christopher Nolan produced, Superman reboot, Man Of Steel.

The story opens by showing us the doomed planet of Krypton, where Jor El (Russell Crowe*) is with his wife, Lara (Ayelet Zurer), as she gives birth to their son, Kal El.

The pair are as doomed as their planet: and plan to send both their son, and a gene-bank of their race, as far as possible from their dying world.

Dying … 

And civil-war-riven.   Jor El’s arch rival, General Zod is determined to control the gene bank and to make sure the only Kryptonians who survive are the one he chooses.

Zod fails: and is sentenced to 300 years in the Phantom Zone as punishment.

Just before Krypton finally explodes … 

~≈Ì≈~

The film cuts to some years later.   And shows us Kor El wandering the world, having grown up on Earth as Clark Kent, having been informally adopted by John and Martha Kent (Kevin Costner and Diane Lane), having flashbacks to his Kansas youth, whilst anonymously helping, using his powers, where needed.

Interweaved with this story is that of Daily Planet reporter, Lois Lane (Amy Adams) who we initially meet in the wintery parts of Canada, investigating an anomalous object being in a glacier.

It’s only when she’s poking around the camp at night, she notices Clark — who’s been using the name ‘Joe’ — seems to have found a route to the object: a 3000 year old Kryptonian spaceship, and one that allows Clark to access the one small piece of home he’s managed to keep.

Access, and use to find out a lot more about his biological parents, his people, Krypton …

All in full view of Ms Lane, who’s kicking herself for having lost her camera.

It’s only AFTER Lois’ boss, Perry White — Laurence Fishburne — has turned down the story that Lois decides to leak it to the internet.

Which is ALSO the time a mysterious spaceship shows up, orbiting the Moon, broadcasting to everyone on Earth to help the ship’s captain find Kal El.

That ship’s captain … ?

Is Zod … 

~≈Ì≈~

Now … 

Impressed … ?

Hell, yes … !

For starters, this is a stunningly designed, and very visual film: with Kryptonian outfits, sets and kit looking like Mœbius designed Timelords,  with H. R. Giger designed armour.

On top of that … ?

On top of that, it’s well written — having Christopher Nolan along for part of the writing seems to help, although I’m sure the rest of the writing team are equally competent — and has an especially strong ensemble cast: I have to say, Crowe, Lane and Costner and Zurer as Clark’s assorted parents, Amy Adams as Lois Lane, and, indeed, Cavill himself, as Superman, were great.

The REAL standout … ?   For me personally, the outstanding member of the cast was Michael Shannon, as Zod: giving the villain a humanity and depth I feel highlights the comic book nature of Terence Stamp’s version.

Additionally, while she’s not the feisty ball-breaker Margo Kidder’s Lois Lane was, Amy Adams is both a level headed, beautiful … and intelligent … alternative.

And, while the story wasn’t perfect, I’m also feel it was pretty damn good: offering danger, emotion, and origins in one and the same package.

I think Man Of Steel would repay a lot of viewings.

Personally … ?

Well …
Man Of Steel
★★★★





















*        Doing a far better English accent than he did in Robin Hood

Thursday, 26 April 2012

Event Horizon: Terror In Deep Space

 I’ll admit it!
 I’m a film fan.

And, while I’ve not recently had company for a film or two, I’ll also admit that, sometimes, that mean’s digging up a film I’ve not seen in years.

Purely because no-one’s around to complain, or suggest an alternative.

To be frank … ?

That was the case, tonight.

Nobody else around … 

So I managed to dig up a film that’s something of an old favourite: the 1997 piece that is Event Horizon … 

☱☴☱

Thursday, 19 January 2012

Contagion: Harum, Scarum, and meaningfully art-house bacteria … 


19th January, 2012.

Well …

THAT’S a thing … !

Well …

Actually, it’s possibly several things, including things that actually AREN’T things.

Which is possibly a phrase designed to give a philosopher a headache, I know that …

Let’s get moving on to what I WANT to talk about, shall … ?

»»·««

Yes, let’s … !

Now, I’ve got to admit I’ve had a quiet patch or two, recently, what with one thing and another.

But … ?

Well, the local library being as good as it is with film rentals, you DO get a hankering for something a touch different.

I do, certainly.

Especially after having seen the VERY entertaining Reign of Fire, the other night: I fancied something a touch slower paced, and managed to bag the 2011, Steven Soderbergh film, Contagion.

And, yes, before you ask: Contagion and Reign of Fire are as different as chalk and cheese*.

»»·««

Saturday, 7 February 2009

Through The Glass, Thirdly.


Hmmm.

We have a distinct excess of crisps.

For those of you who follow me, you probably realise that, skint as I am, this means myself and an old friend have been watching the third of the ‘Matrix’ movies, “Matrix Revolutions”.

Which is lighter on the philosophy and heavier on the action than the first two entries in the series.

Mind you, I wouldn’t mind one of those giant APU things.   As Adrian put, it wouldn’t half make the shopping easier …

Wouldn’t it just?

I love to be in one if someone in front of me is paying by card when I’m in a rush, I know that!

But I digress.

So you know, I’ve put a link into the IMDb entry for The Matrix Revolutions there, so you can look up the plot summary.

And there’s possible a point to get onto here, as well …

As I mentioned earlier,  The Matrix Revolutions is a bit lighter on the philosophy.

It was much more action based.   Very different to the first two, in that sense.

But I think I can state the blindingly obvious, here, and point to the fact that this part of the trilogy has a strongly messianic feel to it – I’m assuming this link, a christian one that argues exactly that, will link to others – and simplifies the philosophical elements that attracted many people to the series in the first place.

Now, as I’ve always said, this isn’t too much of a problem, for me: beyond reaching for the dictionary, of course

One thing I have always felt is that whatever works for you, is fine by me, and so long as we both look at each other’s beliefs in the same way, we’ll rub along fine.   I’m also thinking that the ol’ pop pagan idea – that, that doing your own thing is fine, so long as you harm no one – is a nice little ethic to go along by.

And, in this case, I felt the simplifying was helpful, in a way.   It let the trilogy bounce along to an emotionally satisfying conclusion, without having to do a quick mental double check, to see if one’s caught all the references.   Something I felt that maybe the first two films suffered with, although it did make for interesting discussion, afterwards.

But I do realise that many will disagree with me, here.   After all, for many of us, part of the Matrix trilogies appeal will have been the floating of philosophical concepts that we wouldn’t have otherwise come across, and having a chance to investigate them further.

Which has been burried in science fiction for years, now, I think.

Certainly, a lot of political philosophy, if I’ve understood what I know of Karel Capek’s R. U. R., the play that introduced the English speaking world to the word ‘ROBOT’.

It’s generally known that Gene Roddenberry always encouraged writers on the various incarnations of Star Trek
to tell an entertaining story first, but work in a nice point, where possible.

But messiahdom in sci-fi has cropped up, before …

Frank Herbert fans will know exactly what I mean.

One of my favourite novel’s was Frank Herbert’s Dune: a book that strikes me as being relevant, here.

Matrix Revolutions and Dune, while I find them both entertaining, both seem to take very different views.   The Matrix trilogy, in the end, takes a traditional view  of its central character: that Neo, ultimately is there to save the world.

Paul Muad-Dib, the central character in Dune, isn’t.

He’s a warning.

In the context of the novel, he’s a well educated, superbly bred, almost super heroic warning: messiahs fuck you up.

We only have to look at Adolf Hitler,  Josef Stalin and the likes of Osama bin Laden, to see that our religious feelings can be manipulated to another’s ends.

There’s also talk of how this can be argued about John F Kennedy, Barack Obama, and George W. Bush.

Let’s be frank, we all want a hero, to save us from ourselves.

That’s not a bad thing, not at all, but I also believe we forget that messiahs are human …

Don’t forget, Frank Herbert grew up during World War Two, and was in his late twenties during the Kennedy years; – Kennedy, Hitler, and Stalin can be seen as very human, and very culpable Messiahs

I can do no more than quote from the original novel.

“When religion and politics travel in the same cart, the riders believe nothing can stand in their way. Their movement becomes headlong - faster and faster and faster. They put aside all thoughts of obstacles and forget that a precipice does not show itself to the man in a blind rush until it's too late.”
Bene Gesserit proverb, Dune (Frank Herbert)

“When law and duty are one, united by religion, you never become fully conscious, fully aware of yourself. You are always a little less than an individual.”
‘ … from “Muad’Dib: The Ninety-Nine Wonders of the Universe” by the Princess Irulan’

I think I’ll quietly admit I’ll leave it there, for now, and blog more in the morning.

But I can’t help but still agree with that first quote.   Considering the USA’s current and previous president can be seen as having overtones!

Saturday, 31 January 2009

The Matrix Reloaded: Back Thorough the Looking Glass


Hmm: another night in …

And I swear those crisps will eaten, before the sell by date … !

You can tell we’ve little in the way of money, can’t you?   And that everyone else we know is out, busy or ill …

Anyway, Adrian and I near enough decided, last week, that we’d watch the complete set, and chew themes and sequels over.

And both agreed that middle movies always seem to suffer.

It’s always the way, though, isn’t it?   We felt so so: mostly on the basis that the story arc in a trilogy is, after all, only part way through.

Let’s face it, it has to tie off loose ends from part one, and set up part three.

But here’s the plot, in case you’d like a quick look.

And I’m thinking that’s largely the way movies are made, these days, means the middle film of a threesome is going to suffer.

As far as I’ve understood it, the two Matrix sequels were made back to back – much like the two Back to the Future sequels – and some time after the first entry in the respective franchises.

Which, if I’d understood the received wisdom – it certainly seems the case with Back to the Future: Part Two – that the middle child can be a mess.

Saying that, though, I should point out that – again, as far as I know – the Lord of the Rings trilogy was an exception, there.   If I’ve understood things correctly, Peter Jackson and the rest of the Wingnut Productions crew had all three planned from the start.   I can’t imagine it being any other way, frankly.   But that was influenced by the fact that, although Professor Tolkien would’ve preferred it to be published in one volume, the then currant, post-war, paper rationing meant  that The Lord Of The Rings was published in three parts.   That’s influenced how we see it.

It certainly influenced the films’ producers.

But The Matrix Reloaded does carry on with the whole feel of the first entry in the series.

Guns, babes – however you choose to define ‘babes’ – and buried pop-philosophy, if you want to go looking for it.

There’s whole arguments floating around cyberspace about it, too, ranging from whether it’s waving gnosticism at you, to having a messianic bent.   Even if there’s a Buddhist touch to it!   If I find Jewish, Jain or Rastafarian links, I’ll put them up.

I’m wondering where Errol and Mælcum* have got to, now I really need them.

But Matrix franchise as gnostic gospel is an idea worth chewing over.   The little I know of  gnosticism in it’s various forms, does seem to be on screen.

But I should stress that others know a lot more about it than me.   I can see the basic idea, of an ‘evil’  and materialistic demiurge – demon, god, Architect? – creating an ‘evil world’ thats got humanity trapped, and its logical counterpart, of a non material ‘good’ being trying to help us by teaching us how to overcome this – the Oracle and Neo, possibly — and free ourselves.

I was never sure if I could follow all of the details, completely, though.

Given my upbringing, though, I could spot, and instinctively sympathize with a more overtly Christian view of The Matrix Reloaded: although I’m more of an agnostic view of the world.

Certainly I’ve found myself praying, in times of trouble: but whatever higher power’s up there, I could never say for sure, nor do I believe I’ve a right to dictate to you about it.

Hmmm … I’m turning deep in my old age …

Or into an agnostic equivalent of Richards Dawkins …

Either way, I personally incline more to the messianic view of the film, given who I am today.

For one thing, if Neo is The One, then Agent Smith is definitely The Other One.   Which possibly puts Laurence Fishburne as a cyberpunk John the Baptist.   Where that puts Carrie-Anne Moss’ character, considering we were watching “The DaVinci Code”, a few weeks ago …

Either way, the next chance I get, The Matrix Revolutions is due for another spin.   And given I’ve seen speculation about various trips into the underworld, floating around, means I’m probably going to have to look up the relevant parts of  The Golden Bough, aren’t I?

Anyway, enjoy the music, folks.


Could never resist the video for “Close (To The Edit)”, it’s very symbolic.

Of people wondering round railway stations, with chainsaws.





*   Alright, I couldn’t resist a “Neuromancer” reference.   This is a cyberpunk we’re talking about, here.

Saturday, 24 January 2009

The Matrix: Through the Looking Glass …


Now here’s a thing.

A nicely chewy night in Adrian, and a copy of The Matrix, and lots of tea!

We have GOT to use those crisps, at some point!!

I’ve pot a link to the IMDb synopsis, here, but let me recap, briefly: The Matrix, is the story of Neo (Keanu Reeves) who finds the reality he lives in is a computer generated fantasy: designed to keep humanity enslaved and usable as batteries by computers.

As part of this, Neo also finds — through Morpheus (Laurewnce Fishburne) — that he’s the much talked of ‘One’.

Like I say, I’ve put in a link, above to the plot synopsis, above, so I’ll speak no more of it, here.   But it is one with deliberately inserted depths.

I’m no philosopher, I’ll admit, but one of the obvious subtexts – that reality is an illusion, controlled by others, for their purposes – isn’t hard to spot.   And probably be an interesting study, if I can find a halfway simple guide.

And I certainly can never work out whether, in the words of Douglas Adams, Larry and Andy Wachowski are “… getting needlessly messianic”.

We could carry on, couldn’t we?

And on top of that, there’s influences on, and from, other sources.

Film, the written word, and the odd bit of TV!!

Obviously, there’s tons of film I could point to.

The original Alien, and Bladerunner amongst them: there’s a lot more, according to Wikipedia, but those are the two I was thinking of, tonight, especially in terms of each film’s look and feel.

I’m also thinking The Matrix has influenced science fiction, and fantasy, after it, as well: certainly, the Underworld trilogy of films seem heavily influenced by it, in terms of action and colour palette.

Cyberpunk’s had a huge influence, here, as well.

I can’t remember when I first read Neuromancer, but William Gibson’s first and best known novel, does show its influence, here.   Neo is, in terms of the artificial reality he’s trapped in, a minor criminal hacker, and stylish with it, much like a certain Mister Henry Dorset Case, the central protagonist of  Neuromancer.

I can’t help but wonder, as well, if the Wachowskis ever saw some of the nineteen-seventies era Doctor Who?

I know that’s where I first saw the concept of a Matrix: a huge computer, or computer network, that one could directly plug oneself into, that fed an alternative reality into a users mind, and which could kill, if one wasn’t careful.

One really does wonder.

And that, I think, is kind of the point, with any half way bit of decent science fiction.   It’ll tell you a ripping good yarn.

But it can make you wonder …

To quote Julian May, “Science Fiction will never run out of things to wonder about until the human race ceases to use its brain.”.

And I think that’s a good quote to leave on, isn’t it?