Showing posts with label William Hunter Way. Show all posts
Showing posts with label William Hunter Way. Show all posts

Wednesday, 7 January 2015

The Brentwood Gazette’s Weekly Teaser — 7-1-2015: Lucky Number Seven …

Hmmm … 

I have to admit, I’ve just seen this week’s Brentwood Gazette.

The front page … ?

Tells us that Brentwood Council’s impressed with one potential candidate for a cinema in William Hunter Way.

Put forward by a chap who runs an independent cinema in Mile End.

A luxury one screener seems to have forty seats!

It’s not a cinema, from what I can see: it’s a wide screen TV in someone’s front room!

~≈∑≈~

Monday, 17 February 2014

The Daily Teaser — 17-2-2014

You know, I actually managed to see a movie, yesterday: at a cinema.

My sister, Ruth and I took my nephew, Jude, to see Turbo, at the Basildon Empire: one of the nearer cinemas to town.

Fun film, I think: although I don’t know if Jude was completely impressed, for all that he liked the sweeties … 

Either way, I have to admit to a certain amount of disappointment.

We went to Basildon to see that film.   As any one who bought last week’s Gazette will know, I sent in a letter that expressed my sadness about the proposed cinema in William Hunter Way being cancelled.

I grew up in a Brentwood that had a cinema.

Why should my three year old nephew be any different?

~≈Â≈~

At any rate, let’s get a move on, shall we?

Yesterday’s Teaser saw Debbi* putting in her answers: and, along with letting us know about Maryland’s weather, also scoring five out of five.

Let’s see how she — and you — do with today’s questions, shall we?

Here they are, along with the How To, License and video … 

Q1) 17th February, 2011, saw the start of civil war: in which North African country … ?
Q2) The rebels were fighting the country’s now dead dictator: who was he … ?
Q3) Moving on … 17th February, 1949, saw Chaim Weizmann elected as President of which Middle Eastern country … ?
Q4) 17th February, 1933, saw the Blaine Act passed in the USA.   Famously, this ended the prohibition of what, in the USA … ?
Q5) 17th February, 1959, saw the launch of the Vanguard 2 weather satellite.   It launched to measure what aspect of the weather: rainfall, cloud cover or the amount of reflected sunlight?
Q6) Finally … 17th February, 1945, saw the birth of Irish actress, Brenda Fricker.   For which film was she the first Irish winner of the Best Supporting Actress Oscar … ?
Here’s yesterday’s questions and answers … 
Q1) The world’s first computerized BBS opened: on 16th February, 1978.   In which US city … ?
A1) Chicago.
Q2) In which US state is that city … ?
A2) Illinois.
Q3) What does BBS stand for … ?
A3) Bulletin Board System.
Q4) The first BBS to be set up in the UK was called Forum … what: 80, 90 or 1000?
A4) 80.
Q5) Finally … the BBS system’s creators made the software: whilst snowed in during the Great what of 1978 … ?
A5) Blizzard.
I’ll leave you with this tune from the Triffids … 


And this thought from the late Andre Norton …
“There’s no night without stars.”
Andre Norton  February 17, 1912 – March 17, 2005
Have a good day.








*         Bloody HELL, but that sounds familiar, Debbi!   (Oh … I woke up to frost, today, so you know: this was after sunshine, all day yesterday!)

Sunday, 16 February 2014

The Daily Teaser — 16-2-2014: BBS

Ooh, that sound’s exciting … !

Bless her, my sister, Ruth, has decided to take her son, Jude, to see a movie.

In a cinema.

In Basildon, wouldn’t you know: there’s possibly a sarcastic comment that I can aim at Brentwood Council, there.   After all, I grew up in a Brentwood with a cinema, I don’t see why my three year old nephew shouldn’t.

At ANY rate … Ruth’s decided Jude really needs to go and see Turbo with his uncle.

Which looks like it could be fun … !

At any rate … ?   Let’s get a move on.


~≈†≈~

Yesterday’s teaser saw Debbi* putting in her answers: along with telling us a cocoa would go down VERY well, she also scored five out of five.

Let’s see how she — and you — do with today’s questions, shall we?

Here they are, along with the How To, License and video … 

Q1) The world’s first computerized BBS opened: on 16th February, 1978.   In which US city … ?
Q2) In which US state is that city … ?
Q3) What does BBS stand for … ?
Q4) The first BBS to be set up in the UK was called Forum … what: 80, 90 or 1000?
Q5) Finally … the BBS system’s creators made the software: whilst snowed in during the Great what of 1978 … ?
Here’s yesterday’s questions and answers … 
Q1) 15th February, 1971, saw Britain decimalize its currency.   In pre-decimal currency, 2 shillings and sixpence was also known as half a … what … ?
A1) Crown.
Q2) 15th February, 1946, saw the world’s first general purpose computer dedicated: in Philadelphia.   What was it called?
A2) ENIAC: which was short for Electronic Numerical Integrator And Computer, so you know.
Q3) 15th February, 2001, saw Nature magazine publish the first complete draft of the human what … ?
A3) Genome.
Q4) 15th February, 1989, saw the Red Army pull out of Afghanistan: following whose decision to reduce the army’s size?
Q5) Finally … 15th February, 2013, saw a meteor explode over Chelyabinsk.   In which country is Chelyabinsk?
A5) Russia.
I’ll leave you with this tune … 


And this thought.
“That program became the singly most modified program in computing history due to the many hardware environments in which it had to operate (no standards - no "IBM" to say where serial ports should be addressed, etc).”
Ward Christensen, author of the CBBS software.
Enjoy your day.










*        Wouldn’t you know, it Debbi?   We’ve got sunshine, right now!   The UK’s weather is … inconsistent, let’s put it that way!

Friday, 7 February 2014

The William Hunter Way Development: or CINEMA … !

I have to admit, I have something of an opinion.

Several of them, actually.

I think a penny saved is a penny earned: that recycling’s a good thing to do: that every one has good and bad in them.

Oh, and that Macs  are superior to PCs.

Something most of my friends are possibly trued of hearing me pontificate about.

Something else I believe … ?

Is that the closure of my home town’s two screen cinema, many years ago, was a bad thing.

Certainly for me: at the time, it was a cheap night out for someone who’d been in and out of part time work, so having to travel to see a film added an extra cost.

An extra cost I, for one, resented.

Then and now.

So the fact that Brentwood Borough Council approved a development for a cinema, an associated carpark and set of retail units, was something I welcomed.

Unfortunately … ?

Unfortunately, that development has now been cancelled.

And going by the reports in the Brentwood Gazette, cancelled because the Council and developers couldn’t agree on the rent: and whether it should be linked to the Retail Prices Index.

And I must admit to a certain amount of sadness about the whole thing.

~≈†≈~

You know, maybe sadness is the wrong word, here.

Maybe I should focus, instead, on anger.

At both the Council: and the developers, Stocklands.

From what I can recall from the Gazette reports at the time, Stocklands were seriously hit by the recession: and put the William Hunter Way development on hold, while assorted things were done at the company’s HQ in Australia.   And while the UK branch renegotiated the rent deal.

I also have to admit, I’m also angry at Brentwood Council.

Both the Conservative administration, who seem to have badly botched the deal in the first place: not least by letting the whole thing drag on for some eight to nine years longer than it needed to be.

My feelings, there, are that this could have been concluded a lot sooner than it has been.   With Brentwood having a cinema built by Stocklands: OR by someone else, if they felt they couldn’t afford to.

I feel the Tories have badly let us down.

I’m ALSO annoyed at local Liberal Democrats: something I know will sadden Councillor Chilvers, who, to her credit, has stood by her belief that the plans — as they stood — weren’t a good thing for town.

I feel that the Lib-dem members on the council have not made their case strongly enough: OR publicly enough.

They may well have had alternatives to the Stocklands deal: but none they ever made public, as far as I could see, and that — in my opinion — they should have done.

I personally believe that had these plans gone ahead, they would have been a net benefit to the town.

~≈†≈~

Personally … ?

Personally, I’m very aware that talk started in 2005, about a potential new cinema in Brentwood.   Something I have both welcomed, dreamed of and written about for a long time.

I seriously believed, back in 2005, that Brentwood could benefit from a multi-screen cinema*: and the associated retail and hospitality jobs.

I still do.

The fact they have been cancelled … ?

Is no loss to Stocklands.

Or to some at Brentwood Council.

But to us: the people of Brentwood, who would have benefitted from this.










*        The little I understand of the economics of the situation — something I’ve discussed with friends more familiar with the industry than I — confirms my personal belief that a venue with four to six screens — at the minimum — is the minimum affordable option that most chains would consider.

Friday, 1 May 2009

More stuff about the Cinema!!!


Phew!

The amount of digging I’ve just done!

And not to get the cinema built, either.   Except metaphorically, either!!!!

But, at any rate, I’ve just spent a — debatedly — fruitful 20 minutes or so, emailing Kerry Hartnett, the Local Government Ombudsman team member who, seemingly, deals with our area, to find out as much as possible about the possible complaint that the various anti’s may have put in.

Please notice I say MAY have put in.

Because they can’t actually say whether they have or not, because of the various Data protection laws.

Hmmm …

I don’t quite know how I feel about that.

I do know it’s frustrating not to know for certain, simply if one’s been received, or not.

And I also know that, based on the information I’ve received from both Kerry Hartnett at the Local Governed Office, and from the Planning Office at Brentwood Coucil, that we should send a letter of support to Steven Boyle — the Complaints Officer at Brentwood Council — to help offset any complaints that the Swan Paddock Residents Association or the Save Brentwood Action Group choose to make to the Ombudsman Office.

Here’s his email adress; steve.boyle@brentwood.gov.uk

And here’s the email I sent; 

“Dear Mr Boyle, I’m writing to show my support for Brentwood Council’s approval for the recently approved William Hunter Way development – BRW/729/2008 — as I feel the associated shops and cinema will bring both much needed jobs and entertainment to this town.

As a jobseeker, I look forward to appying for a job, there, and also hope it will bring many years entertainment to the area; something Brentwood has been in sore need of.

I also feel I should point out that the Swan Paddock Residents Association, and Save Brentwood Action Group do not represent all the residents of this town, nor necessarily have the towns best long term interests at heart.

Please feel free to look over the various posts I have made about it, on http://niknaksoldpeculiarblog.blogspot.com/search/label/cinema”

Obviously, if this is something you’d want to do yourself, I’d seriously urge you get going with the cutting and pasting!!

Actually, I’d seriously urge you do it, now; I don’t know whether a complaint has been made, although I suspect it may have done.

Every bit helps …

Wednesday, 8 April 2009

The NIMBY’S Are Revolting!

Well, bit of a thing; I was so pleased about getting a letter released in the Gazette today, I didn’t read much further.

It seems that the Swan Paddock Residents Association are planning to complain to the Local Government Ombudsman.

About the cinema.

I don’t believe it!!!

Just when everyone thought the dust had settled, a small bunch of NIMBY’s want to try and dictate the social lives and job prospects of the rest of us.

I’m ticked off.

To say the least.

By a residents association of a street in Brentwood, that I can’t evan find on Google Maps.

So, here’s what I’m going to do.

I’ve already sent an email about this to advice@lgo.org.uk, and use the email I sent as a template to try and forestall this.

But, Dear Lord!!!!

At any rate, here’s the text I use, and would suggest you use, as well.   But feel free to put your own name and address in.

To whom it may concern,

I am writing in regards to plans for a development to include shops, flats, and a six screen cinema in the William Hunter Way in Brentwood, Essex, recently approved by Brentwood Council.

This has been something of a controversy in my home town, about this.

While I realise there may have been irregularities in the approval, when brought before Hazel Blears MP, the Minister for Local Government and Communities, she did not call it in for appeal.

I feel that this should settle the matter.

However, I do know a small and vocal minority of my fellow residents are planning to complain about the council’s behaviour.

I’m someone who supports the planned development, and feel it will bring much needed jobs, homes, and entertainment to our town, and feel that a small minority should not dictate to a majority.

As such, I would like to ask what the Local Government Ombudsman will be doing, should the complaint from the Swan Paddock Residents Association come to your attention.

Yours, in anticipation, 


Paul Downie

I’ve also fired off another letter about this, to the Gazette, by the way; here …

Dear Gazette

I’ve got to confess that I mildly shocked.   I got today’s Gazette and was so pleased to see my last letter published, I didn’t read much further, until I got home.

So you can imagine my shock and annoyance in readin the letter from Phil Mynott of the Swan Paddock Residents Association, informing all and sundry that they were planning to complain to the Local Government Ombudsman. 

About the cinema.

I couldn’t believe it!!!

Just when everyone thought the dust had settled, a small vocal minority want to try and dictate the social lives and job prospects of the rest of us.

I’m ticked off, to put it mildly.  If, for no other reason than annoyance that a small group are being seemingly more highhanded than a democratically elected local authority.

A residents association of a street that can’t be found on Google Maps.

I would urge those of my fellow residents who support the development to contact advice@lgo.org.uk and ask the office of the Local Government Ombudsman, ask what they intend to do, point out that Hazel Blears MP refused to call it in, and how we can speak in the favour of the plans.

I have, as ever, posted this to to my blog, and urge you to use the template I’ve included there, to contact the Ombudsman.

Saturday, 7 March 2009

Brentwood’s Cinema.

7th March, 2009

Just thought I’d put in a quick post.

I’ll give the local Liberal Democrats a brief nod for being quick to reply.

I sent a quick email last week: to some of the councillors quoted in a recent Gazette article; and got an automated out of office reply from Councillor Lewis.   Along with a reply from Councillor Kendall.

Here’s the email I sent.
Hello.
    It’s come to my attention that you have been quoted in this week’s Brentwood Gazette, after the recent Council meeting about the development about the proposed cinema.
    I’m personally in favour of the development, seeing it as a chance to try and find both entertainment and a job in the area.
    I’ve posted to my blog about this matter and wondered if you would like to comment?
Yours,
Paul Downie.
Councillor Kendall’s reply:
Dear Paul
Thank you for your e-mail.
    I have always been keen for a Cinema to return to Brentwood and support the principle of a mixed development on the William Hunter Way site.
    However I could not vote for the recent planning application because in my view the sheer size and scale of what was proposed was wrong for Brentwood. I believe that there should have been two or three development options for councillors and residents to consider that were of a size and scale more suited to the site and the town centre environment as a whole.
    I also believe there should have been a full Borough wide public consultation on the plans and an Environmental Assessment Study completed but both these requests were rejected by the administration.
    Any development on the site would have bought much needed jobs to the town but I think we could have achieved this objective without voting for this particular monstrosity.
Regards
David
Cllr David Kendall
Leader, Liberal Democrat Group
Brentwood Borough Council.
Hmmm … monstrosity.

Ok.

I’m certainly not be surprised that there’s been slightly iffy goings-on in the council chamber: you only have to look at Rollason Way’s parking to know there’s been a cock-up, somewhere.

But while I’m no economist, I’m fairly sure that that many film production companies tend to prefer make films roughly 90 minutes or so in length.   This means that they can – in the time it takes to show an episode of <i>Lord of the Rings</i> –  show two other movies, and make their money back faster.   Which, to me, implies having more screens, to do exactly that.

The movie business is exactly that: a <i>business</i>.

A multi screen cinema/cineplex*/what-ever they’re called, these day’s, is a way of maximising their investment in a faster time.

Which leads to what seems a sensible conclusion, to me.   That, simply, any developer who intends to build one will want to make one as large as possible; – with plenty of extra retail units, and the associated leases, to cover their costs.

Leave a comment, folks.




* That’s partly why the Brentwood’s 2-screen cinema went down.   Two screens meant more of a wait to see the new films we wanted to see.   Which automatically handed the two 6-screen cinemas at Lakeside an audience, on a plate.

Friday, 6 March 2009

What a Day

Jeeez, what a day. You really don’t want to ask about the day – or afternoon and evening, I should say – I’ve had at work.

Just don’t ask about power cuts. I’m just hoping the branch of Londis, near were I work, comes out of the hour and a quarter long power-cut we had.

But on to other things.

One upside to the End of the King Harold quiz is simply the fact I’ve more time to work on a table round/main round for the 17th of March – Saint Patrick’s night – and this week’s table round. I will be blogging, though. I’ll probably have more time pontificate about stuff …

Like movies. One nice thing about the week, is that my two sisters have offered to take me to see Watchmen, this weekend; – something I’m looking forward to.

But being able to walk to my nearest cinema to see it would be nice

Brentwood Council has now approved the cinema complex: you can read the Gazette’s coverage, here.

But let me quote it, though: this is from this week’s edition of the Brentwood Gazette, dated Thursday the 5th of March, and I’ll apologise for not giving the by-line of the writer, but a name’s not been given.

“AFTER four years of wranglings, a multi-million-pound cinema, retail and residential complex is coming to Brentwood.
The decision to allow development of a six-screen cinema, 10-level 654-space car park, shops and 14 new homes on the William Hunter Way car park was passed with a clear majority of 20 to eight.
Protesters, dismayed at the decision and insisting the development's size and scale is too big, have vowed to fight on.
The atmosphere during Wednesday's council debate was the most fraught in years.
The council chamber was packed with more than 80 residents many holding placards proclaiming ‘Ignored Town’.
Click here!
Many more, who could notsqueeze inside, watched from a remote screen next door as proceedings were halted on several occasions due to heckling.
The decision has been described by some as the most significant since the A12 Brentwood bypass was built in 1964.
And while several councillors spoke out against the scheme, complaining that the size and scale would wreck the quality of life for those residents in Chestnut Grove, North Road and Western Avenue, only one Tory councillor – Margaret Brehaut – voted against it.
She described the £25million development as a carbuncle.
Lib Dem leader Cllr David Kendall said councillors were in danger of appearing reckless.
Tory councillor Russell Quirk, who had already ruled himself out of voting by speaking against the plans, appealed to councillors to follow their conscience.
Cllr Jan Pound was among the 20 Conservative councillors who voted in favour of the proposals.
She said she moved to Brentwood because Chelmsford had lost its soul and the development was vital to keep it from dying and to put some vibrancy back.
Phil Mynott, a member of Swan Paddocks Residents' Association, which is opposed to the plans in their current form, said: ‘This is not the end, we will we fight on.’
Cllr Mike Le Surf, leader of the Labour group, said: ‘The depressing decision by the Tories to push through this planning application in the face of such strong opposition, shows their disregard for the residents of the borough.’
"The administration were so keen to tell us that the town is dying but still supported a move that could kill off any real chance of recovery in the long term."
But Cllr Brandon Lewis, borough council leader, said: ‘This was a difficult decision for councillors to make, but one which had to be made.’
‘On balance, we have had to look at Brentwood as a whole and make a decision as to what is best for the entire borough.’
‘Whilst we acknowledge and understand some of the concerns raised by residents at the ordinary council meeting and during previous consultations, we are also aware of the vast numbers of people in Brentwood who support the development and wish to see it go forward.’
He said the development would bring significant economic benefits to the town bringing many new jobs.”

And, although I’m a touch more left wing than most, I’m can’t help but agree, to a point, with conservative Cllr Brandon Lewis’ basic point about job’s in this town of ours. I’m one of those people who’d like to benefit from applying for one.

And mildly shocked that Cllr Le Surf hadn’t brought this up. That could well be bias in the case of the journalist; – but shocking from someone representing a party founded to help and represent the working classes.

Which I’m not: but I work, and want more work.

I’ve also benefited from some of Brentwood’s new developments. My flat is in the unused industrial area around the gasworks, near Brentwood station.

So I can’t help but, generally welcome this: complete horlicks though the parking is.

You know, I think I might just email the link to the various named councillors. Just to get some idea of their views.

Friday, 27 February 2009

At The Movies


Movies.

My home town has long had a problem, with movies.

Or, it seems to me, going to the cinema …

Some five years ago — if my sometimes erratic memory serves me correctly — what was the Chapel High Shopping centre, and is now the Bay Tree Centre, had Brentwood’s only cinema.

So I was rather saddened when it closed about back then.

I don’t know about you, but I like seeing a film at the pictures, every so often …

These days, once or twice a year is a frantic amount of cinema going, but, when we had a reasonably priced local picture palace, it was much more frequent.

So when Brentwood announced its plans to allow a new one to be built in town, I was pleased.

No more tedious and pricey to Romford or Lakeside to catch a flick!

But there are objections: which can be found here.

Now, while I can understand people objecting to a given new development, particularly if it’s on their back door, I personally plan to ignore them.

I’d like to see a film, in a cinema in my home town.

I don’t want to pay extra, on a train, bus or cab, for the privilege.

Frankly, on my budget, I’d rather use that money on popcorn …