Showing posts with label Keanu Reeves. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Keanu Reeves. Show all posts

Saturday, 2 September 2017

Nik Nak’s Daily Teaser — 2-9-2017: Keanu

Has anyone bee watching Game of Thrones, recently?

I have to admit, I have.

I’ve been throughly enjoying it, too.

Granted the sex, violence, swearing, more sex, plotting, magic, exposition, even more sex, giant walls, all of it modelled on various bits of English history — with added sex and dragons — isn’t going to be for everyone.

But it?   And season seven?

Have been riveting to watch.

I’ve got to give the show’s makers credit: they’ve made fantasy a TV phenomena.

And season eight, the last?   Out next year?

Could well go out with a bang … 

Oh, and more sex … 

~≈Ú≈~

Thursday, 29 December 2016

The Neon Demon — Wha … ?

29th December, 2016

You know … I like an occasional movie.

I really do.

That’s when I get the chance to see one.

Working nights, though?

Doesn’t give me that many free evenings.

I had one, tonight.

And really fancied something that’s been on my iTunes wish list a while.

The 2016, Nicholas Winding Refn piece that is The Neon Demon.

And … ?

It’s a bit … 

Different … 

~≈Â≈~

Friday, 5 October 2012

The Day The Earth Stood Still: A quick word


You know … Boring night’s in, on your todd, can be … 

Umm … 

Well, boring, to be frank.

Unless you’ve got something to do or watch, of course.

Actually … I had both.

I had a digital copy of The Day The Earth Stood Still: the 2008 remake, I should add, and something I’ve seen, enjoyed and written about before.


Definitely something to watch.

What tickled me … ?   Was the simple fact I actually managed to catch it on Dirty Gerty, the Media Strumpet.

Hmmm … 

You’re bemused, again, aren’t you … ?

~~~~~

Allow me to do a bit of explaining.

You’ve probably VERY aware I’m a bit of a Mac fan: and one on a bit of a budget, frankly.

But one that who’d been given an aging G4 PowerMac by some of my next door neighbours, who are soon to move out and wanted to save space on the lorry: I have to admit, I happily gave Andy and Claire a polite thank you, and can only wish them well, when they do move.

After all, they’ve given me something to do for a while, along with a cheap media machine.

You see, with nothing else on, last night, I hooked up the G4 up to Bruce — my 2007 Model Mac Mini — through what’s called FireWire Target Disc Mode.

Mostly to get any extraneous stuff off the machine, and transfer a couple of films over.

Which, I should add, worked nicely.

Once that was done … ?

I hooked Gerty up to my TV, changed over to the VGA channel.

And floated around to see how she blew.

~~~~~

Actually … 

She blew rather well.

He says … !

OK, The Day The Earth Stood Still came out looking rather choppy: going by the usual information pane I was able to access doing viewing, the film was going at about half the frame it should have been.

On the OTHER hand … ?

That’s not something I was too worried about, not when I on my own.   (With visitors, I’d be rewiring Bruce.)

And it did make for an interesting viewing experience.

Here … 

Let me leave you with what I thought of the film …
The Day The Earth Stood Still
★★★☆

Sunday, 21 November 2010

The Devil's Advocate: Hell’s A Popping …


20/11/10

You know, Movie Nights can be both a heck of a lot of fun, sometimes.


And — as I’m sure you’ve guessed by nowalso generate quite a bit of discussion.

Something of a relevant one, tonight, actually …

Maybe not one of any great merit in the sum total of everything that is Life, The Universe and Everything, but certainly one that’s relevantº …

Now, if you’ve been following me for a while, you’ll probably know that Kevin D, Movie Night Adrian and I get together — as frequently as we can — for a film.

The discussion … ?

Was triggered by our semi regular guest, Squeaky.

Who knew, bless her, that 1) I have a copy of the Al Pacino/Keanu Reeves film, The Devils Advocate, sitting around.

And 2) that we’ve been chewing over good on-screen performances as the Devil, now, for some time …

||»»•««||

21/11/10

After all, there’s been a few that’s ben mentioned, over the past few months.

Adrian had bee umming and ahhing about Robert De Niro’s devilish performance as Mr Cyphre in Angel Heart, I’d always favoured Gabriel Byrne in End of Days, Kevin, bless him, always gives a brief nod to Jack Nicholson in The Witches of Eastwich. And Squeaky, Adrian and I all ticked Kevin off for not checking out Joseph Mawle’s nastily urban performance as Papa B, in Heartless.

But we near enough all agreed on one thing.

Near the top of anyone’s list of assorted devils …

Is a certain Mr Pacino in The Devil’s Advocate


The Devil’s Advocate sees’ Keanu Reeves playing lawyer, Kevin Lomax: an arrogant lawyer who — on winning his 65th case* in a row — is contacted by a representative from New York law firm, headed by John Milton, played by Al Pacino.

And offered a job. One that has both a huge salary on offer.

And more hidden extra’s than first revealed.

||»»•««||

Now, I know that supernatural drama’s aren’t going to be everyone’s cup of tea.

But I’d seriously recommend The Devil’s Advocate to all and sundry.

For starters, the two male leads — Pacino and Reeves — put in great performances, Pacino in particular.

Arguably, his is one of the performances as the Devil.

For me, though … ?

An equally good performance was by Charlize Theron, as Mary Ann Lomax: slowly going mad, over the course of the film.

||»»•««||

Right … !

Now here’s where I’m going to have to leave you.

After all, laundry does not do itself.

But one thought I will leave you with … ?

Go see The Devil’s Advocate.








* A rather nasty one involving a teacher accused of abusing a pupil.

º Along with one that wasn’t: mostly a variation of our old favourite, is cinema dead. Or game stores, in this case …

Sunday, 19 July 2009

The Day The Earth Stood Still: A Review


19th July, 2009.

My word, isn’t it amazing what you can do, in an hour or so, if you’ve got visitors!!


Well, it is!

Saturday night is — as you’ve probably worked out by now — a semi-regular Movie night, as and when me and Adrian get the chance.

And today, we had company!

Bless, we were joined tonight, by Gwen — an old online friend of mine— and her partner, Stefan.

Good meeting Stef, actually. It’s the first time I’d met him, and I like him.

And, as you’ve probably guessed, as it’s the first time I’ve had visitors down for a Movie Night, I couldn’t help but at least mop the floor, and wave a duster at the obvious stains.

And at least get some incense going, to cover the whiff!

Well, you want to at least look like you’ve made an effort!! (Allison will probably make a comment or two, there … …)

And tonight’s film actually sparked some lively debate; both of the getting to know you sort, and going in all sorts of fascinating directions.

If you hadn’t guessed, it was the 2008 cut of “The Day the Earth Stood Still,” starring Keanu Reeves as Klaatu, and Jennifer Connelly, as Dr Helen Benson; the character originally taken by Patricia Neal, in the 1951 original.

It’s a remake, by the way.

And quite a good one, I think, at that. The 1951 version is something of a science fiction classic; something I’d imagine would make many an older fan a little leery.

I’m not surprised. After all, remakes do have a reputation …

But this one’s actually done well, I think we were all agreed on that, tonight. Certainly the effects were better this time around, from what I can remember of the original.

Something I do remember, though, is that — in the original film — was Gort.

Phew.

Gort!

For those of you who don’t know, the plot centres around the Klaatu character coming to Earth and warning humanity to change its ways; to abandon nuclear weapons in the original, to change its environmental behaviour in the 2008 version.

The carrot, in both interpretations of the story, is that humanity gets to live, survive and grow.

(There’s a nice little speech from John Cleese’s character, on that front.)

The stick?

Is Gort, Klaatu’s robot assistant.

Nw I can remember having seen the original, as a child, and being terrified by Gort; a very human shaped robot, with a blatantly unhuman — unhuman, not inhuman, unhuman*º— face.

Something I’m glad to say remained — bar a few minimal cosmetic improvement’s — unchanged in this re-telling of the story.

Tonight saw four adult, mature, intelligent human beings riveted to our seats; both by the film.

And by Gort.

That makes it worth watching for starters.

On top of that, it’s a film I’m going to happily recommend to all and sundry. I’m thinking we’ve seen a very well done remake; something that stays true to its source material, and brings it up to date quite well. Maybe simplistically.

But with enough of an edge to make it worth renting.

It even managed a “Cool!” from Adrian.

And as I’m sure you, Gwen and Stefan have worked out, Adrian can be very hard to please.








* This is something I can remember many years ago, from an old “Doctor Who” story called “Robots Of Death”, is that a fear of robots — or science fictional style, humanoid robots — has something like this as a basis. That robots are designed to look human, but aren’t. The Doctor calls it Robophobia. Isaac Asimov … calls it the Frankenstein Complex. There’s probably a thesis or two, there … But if I understood what “The Robots of Death” was saying correctly, it boils down to the fact that the robots look human; but don’t have human body language. You can see that being a problem, if the Asimo project gets really going.

º I’m also personally half convinced that whoever designed the Cylons, in “Battlestar Galactica”, may have had Gort in mind. “Klaatu Barada Niktu”, to coin a phrase!

Sunday, 22 March 2009

Constantine: Sunday Night at the Movies


Hmmm – here’s an interesting one to catch on a Sunday night …


As you’ll no doubt be aware, if I’ve quiet Saturday night, I’ll have friends over, to catch a movie.

Hopefully, by the time Brentwood’s cinema gets built, my finances will have improved enough to walk up there, and buy a ticket.

Here’s hoping!

But, for the past couple of weeks, I’ve been working: so, when Adrian suggested popping over, to catch Constantineº, which neither of us had caught in a while, I was up for it.

Shame no one else could make it: I think there’s a week left on those blessed kettle chips …

It’s also a shame no-one else could make it, either, because Constantine is certainly worth watching, if only once or twice.

Now granted, myself and Adrian have seen comic book heroes before and can both put the original Blade, V for Vendetta, and Dark Knight forward as better examples of the genre turned into films – along with Tank Girl as an example of a bit of a stinker – but Constantine itself does managed to show us something we both think we can agree on.

A flawed hero: which John Constantine certainly is given that, unlike many other Hollywood characters, he smokes like a pile of burning leaves.

We certainly didn’t agree on the casting: I still think that Bruce Willis would have been an interest choice. Or possibly Jason Statham …

One thing I’ve found from the Wikipedia entry on the character is that – as originally conceived by a certain Alan Moore – is very different. And something I wouldn’t’ve have minded seeing, myself.

But I can’t complain too much. Keanu Reeves is a capable actor and leading man, and usually can be guaranteed to do well with any given script.

And the rest of the casting is very well done, as well: Rachel Weisz as both Angela Dodson, and her dead twin sister, Isabel, Shia LeBouef as Chas, Djimon Hounsou as Papa Midnite*, and Tilda Swinton as the very ambiguous – or, at least, ambiguously hairdo’ed – Angel Gabriel.

Actually, that’s a point.

In some religous traditions, angels are seen as genderless.

Certainly in many Christian ones, Gabriel is seen as male: given that Tilda Swinton famously played Virginia Wolfe’s gender hoping hero, Orlando, that hairdo seems very appropriate.

As does Swinton’s casting as Gabriel in the first place …

But back to my earlier point: we did get to have a good natter about that, we thinking automatically back to Who Watches The Watchemen as the archetypal flawed superheroes story, and Adrian making the mother of all counterpoints.

That the original flawed super hero would’ve been in Greek myth.


Who he had to remind me was sentenced to do the Twelve Labours as a result of killing his family.

Certainly what I call upping the argument ante!

There’s another thing we agreed on, as well.

We’ll both admit to happily differing on religion: I’m more agnostic, Adrian tends to make Richard Dawkins look like the Pope.

But we both felt you could dig through the Vatican’s backlog and find endless fuel for a film.

Which already ranges from Constantine and The Exorcist at one end, through Stigmata and The Da Vinci Code, and ending up somewhere near Nuns on the Run and The Pope Must Die.

Via the Hanger Lane gyratory system, in the last two cases …

Anyway, for now, that’s where I’ll leave things, I am pooped. I’ll update things in the morning.

Until then …




* Wizards. I always have something of a thing about wizards. Q, the Finn, Doctor Who

º Just as a final thought, having read the Wikipedia entry on the original comic book character, how much influence it had on ITV’s Demons. It just seems that the Phillip Glenister character – Rupert Galvin – seemingly had a very superficial resemblance.

Saturday, 7 February 2009

Through The Glass, Thirdly.


Hmmm.

We have a distinct excess of crisps.

For those of you who follow me, you probably realise that, skint as I am, this means myself and an old friend have been watching the third of the ‘Matrix’ movies, “Matrix Revolutions”.

Which is lighter on the philosophy and heavier on the action than the first two entries in the series.

Mind you, I wouldn’t mind one of those giant APU things.   As Adrian put, it wouldn’t half make the shopping easier …

Wouldn’t it just?

I love to be in one if someone in front of me is paying by card when I’m in a rush, I know that!

But I digress.

So you know, I’ve put a link into the IMDb entry for The Matrix Revolutions there, so you can look up the plot summary.

And there’s possible a point to get onto here, as well …

As I mentioned earlier,  The Matrix Revolutions is a bit lighter on the philosophy.

It was much more action based.   Very different to the first two, in that sense.

But I think I can state the blindingly obvious, here, and point to the fact that this part of the trilogy has a strongly messianic feel to it – I’m assuming this link, a christian one that argues exactly that, will link to others – and simplifies the philosophical elements that attracted many people to the series in the first place.

Now, as I’ve always said, this isn’t too much of a problem, for me: beyond reaching for the dictionary, of course

One thing I have always felt is that whatever works for you, is fine by me, and so long as we both look at each other’s beliefs in the same way, we’ll rub along fine.   I’m also thinking that the ol’ pop pagan idea – that, that doing your own thing is fine, so long as you harm no one – is a nice little ethic to go along by.

And, in this case, I felt the simplifying was helpful, in a way.   It let the trilogy bounce along to an emotionally satisfying conclusion, without having to do a quick mental double check, to see if one’s caught all the references.   Something I felt that maybe the first two films suffered with, although it did make for interesting discussion, afterwards.

But I do realise that many will disagree with me, here.   After all, for many of us, part of the Matrix trilogies appeal will have been the floating of philosophical concepts that we wouldn’t have otherwise come across, and having a chance to investigate them further.

Which has been burried in science fiction for years, now, I think.

Certainly, a lot of political philosophy, if I’ve understood what I know of Karel Capek’s R. U. R., the play that introduced the English speaking world to the word ‘ROBOT’.

It’s generally known that Gene Roddenberry always encouraged writers on the various incarnations of Star Trek
to tell an entertaining story first, but work in a nice point, where possible.

But messiahdom in sci-fi has cropped up, before …

Frank Herbert fans will know exactly what I mean.

One of my favourite novel’s was Frank Herbert’s Dune: a book that strikes me as being relevant, here.

Matrix Revolutions and Dune, while I find them both entertaining, both seem to take very different views.   The Matrix trilogy, in the end, takes a traditional view  of its central character: that Neo, ultimately is there to save the world.

Paul Muad-Dib, the central character in Dune, isn’t.

He’s a warning.

In the context of the novel, he’s a well educated, superbly bred, almost super heroic warning: messiahs fuck you up.

We only have to look at Adolf Hitler,  Josef Stalin and the likes of Osama bin Laden, to see that our religious feelings can be manipulated to another’s ends.

There’s also talk of how this can be argued about John F Kennedy, Barack Obama, and George W. Bush.

Let’s be frank, we all want a hero, to save us from ourselves.

That’s not a bad thing, not at all, but I also believe we forget that messiahs are human …

Don’t forget, Frank Herbert grew up during World War Two, and was in his late twenties during the Kennedy years; – Kennedy, Hitler, and Stalin can be seen as very human, and very culpable Messiahs

I can do no more than quote from the original novel.

“When religion and politics travel in the same cart, the riders believe nothing can stand in their way. Their movement becomes headlong - faster and faster and faster. They put aside all thoughts of obstacles and forget that a precipice does not show itself to the man in a blind rush until it's too late.”
Bene Gesserit proverb, Dune (Frank Herbert)

“When law and duty are one, united by religion, you never become fully conscious, fully aware of yourself. You are always a little less than an individual.”
‘ … from “Muad’Dib: The Ninety-Nine Wonders of the Universe” by the Princess Irulan’

I think I’ll quietly admit I’ll leave it there, for now, and blog more in the morning.

But I can’t help but still agree with that first quote.   Considering the USA’s current and previous president can be seen as having overtones!

Saturday, 31 January 2009

The Matrix Reloaded: Back Thorough the Looking Glass


Hmm: another night in …

And I swear those crisps will eaten, before the sell by date … !

You can tell we’ve little in the way of money, can’t you?   And that everyone else we know is out, busy or ill …

Anyway, Adrian and I near enough decided, last week, that we’d watch the complete set, and chew themes and sequels over.

And both agreed that middle movies always seem to suffer.

It’s always the way, though, isn’t it?   We felt so so: mostly on the basis that the story arc in a trilogy is, after all, only part way through.

Let’s face it, it has to tie off loose ends from part one, and set up part three.

But here’s the plot, in case you’d like a quick look.

And I’m thinking that’s largely the way movies are made, these days, means the middle film of a threesome is going to suffer.

As far as I’ve understood it, the two Matrix sequels were made back to back – much like the two Back to the Future sequels – and some time after the first entry in the respective franchises.

Which, if I’d understood the received wisdom – it certainly seems the case with Back to the Future: Part Two – that the middle child can be a mess.

Saying that, though, I should point out that – again, as far as I know – the Lord of the Rings trilogy was an exception, there.   If I’ve understood things correctly, Peter Jackson and the rest of the Wingnut Productions crew had all three planned from the start.   I can’t imagine it being any other way, frankly.   But that was influenced by the fact that, although Professor Tolkien would’ve preferred it to be published in one volume, the then currant, post-war, paper rationing meant  that The Lord Of The Rings was published in three parts.   That’s influenced how we see it.

It certainly influenced the films’ producers.

But The Matrix Reloaded does carry on with the whole feel of the first entry in the series.

Guns, babes – however you choose to define ‘babes’ – and buried pop-philosophy, if you want to go looking for it.

There’s whole arguments floating around cyberspace about it, too, ranging from whether it’s waving gnosticism at you, to having a messianic bent.   Even if there’s a Buddhist touch to it!   If I find Jewish, Jain or Rastafarian links, I’ll put them up.

I’m wondering where Errol and Mælcum* have got to, now I really need them.

But Matrix franchise as gnostic gospel is an idea worth chewing over.   The little I know of  gnosticism in it’s various forms, does seem to be on screen.

But I should stress that others know a lot more about it than me.   I can see the basic idea, of an ‘evil’  and materialistic demiurge – demon, god, Architect? – creating an ‘evil world’ thats got humanity trapped, and its logical counterpart, of a non material ‘good’ being trying to help us by teaching us how to overcome this – the Oracle and Neo, possibly — and free ourselves.

I was never sure if I could follow all of the details, completely, though.

Given my upbringing, though, I could spot, and instinctively sympathize with a more overtly Christian view of The Matrix Reloaded: although I’m more of an agnostic view of the world.

Certainly I’ve found myself praying, in times of trouble: but whatever higher power’s up there, I could never say for sure, nor do I believe I’ve a right to dictate to you about it.

Hmmm … I’m turning deep in my old age …

Or into an agnostic equivalent of Richards Dawkins …

Either way, I personally incline more to the messianic view of the film, given who I am today.

For one thing, if Neo is The One, then Agent Smith is definitely The Other One.   Which possibly puts Laurence Fishburne as a cyberpunk John the Baptist.   Where that puts Carrie-Anne Moss’ character, considering we were watching “The DaVinci Code”, a few weeks ago …

Either way, the next chance I get, The Matrix Revolutions is due for another spin.   And given I’ve seen speculation about various trips into the underworld, floating around, means I’m probably going to have to look up the relevant parts of  The Golden Bough, aren’t I?

Anyway, enjoy the music, folks.


Could never resist the video for “Close (To The Edit)”, it’s very symbolic.

Of people wondering round railway stations, with chainsaws.





*   Alright, I couldn’t resist a “Neuromancer” reference.   This is a cyberpunk we’re talking about, here.

Saturday, 24 January 2009

The Matrix: Through the Looking Glass …


Now here’s a thing.

A nicely chewy night in Adrian, and a copy of The Matrix, and lots of tea!

We have GOT to use those crisps, at some point!!

I’ve pot a link to the IMDb synopsis, here, but let me recap, briefly: The Matrix, is the story of Neo (Keanu Reeves) who finds the reality he lives in is a computer generated fantasy: designed to keep humanity enslaved and usable as batteries by computers.

As part of this, Neo also finds — through Morpheus (Laurewnce Fishburne) — that he’s the much talked of ‘One’.

Like I say, I’ve put in a link, above to the plot synopsis, above, so I’ll speak no more of it, here.   But it is one with deliberately inserted depths.

I’m no philosopher, I’ll admit, but one of the obvious subtexts – that reality is an illusion, controlled by others, for their purposes – isn’t hard to spot.   And probably be an interesting study, if I can find a halfway simple guide.

And I certainly can never work out whether, in the words of Douglas Adams, Larry and Andy Wachowski are “… getting needlessly messianic”.

We could carry on, couldn’t we?

And on top of that, there’s influences on, and from, other sources.

Film, the written word, and the odd bit of TV!!

Obviously, there’s tons of film I could point to.

The original Alien, and Bladerunner amongst them: there’s a lot more, according to Wikipedia, but those are the two I was thinking of, tonight, especially in terms of each film’s look and feel.

I’m also thinking The Matrix has influenced science fiction, and fantasy, after it, as well: certainly, the Underworld trilogy of films seem heavily influenced by it, in terms of action and colour palette.

Cyberpunk’s had a huge influence, here, as well.

I can’t remember when I first read Neuromancer, but William Gibson’s first and best known novel, does show its influence, here.   Neo is, in terms of the artificial reality he’s trapped in, a minor criminal hacker, and stylish with it, much like a certain Mister Henry Dorset Case, the central protagonist of  Neuromancer.

I can’t help but wonder, as well, if the Wachowskis ever saw some of the nineteen-seventies era Doctor Who?

I know that’s where I first saw the concept of a Matrix: a huge computer, or computer network, that one could directly plug oneself into, that fed an alternative reality into a users mind, and which could kill, if one wasn’t careful.

One really does wonder.

And that, I think, is kind of the point, with any half way bit of decent science fiction.   It’ll tell you a ripping good yarn.

But it can make you wonder …

To quote Julian May, “Science Fiction will never run out of things to wonder about until the human race ceases to use its brain.”.

And I think that’s a good quote to leave on, isn’t it?