Showing posts with label Daniel Craig. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Daniel Craig. Show all posts

Thursday, 2 March 2023

Nik Nak’s Daily Teaser — 2nd March 2023.

2nd March, 2023.


I don’t know about you … but my default TV channel is the BBC’s news channel.

And, back in January?

The channel told us that Constance Marten and her boyfriend, Mark Gordon, had gone missing.

It seems she was from a very posh family: and he had convicted of at least one rape — at the age of fourteen — and deported to the UK, from the US.

Their burnt out car was found in January.

I thought, at the time, it sounded romantic: a latter day Bonnie and Clyde, hiding from the police by going seriously off-grid.

Then news came out of Gordon’s offences: apparently, he’s done some twenty years for rape.

Then came the serious news.

The pair had had a child: one who’d not had the usual jabs and checks a new born child would have.

A couple of days ago?

The pair were found — minus the child — and arrested.

With the police searching for the child: and making appeals.

Yesterday … ?

The baby’s body was found.

I could weep.

But also admit I wasn’t surprised: ever since I’d heard they’d been found, but not the child.

The pair have — for whatever reason — gone on the proverbial run.

Which is fair enough.

But … ?

Have — effectively — killed their own child as a result.

I’m deeply saddened … and can only hope the pair do serious amounts of time.

They might have an explanation.

But that doesn’t mean they’ve got an excuse: not for the death of a child.

~≈👶🏽≈~

Saturday, 24 December 2022

Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery — A Review

23rd December, 2023: Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery.


It’s Friday, isn’t it?

Yes: he says, briefly checking his calendar.

It’s Friday: the 23rd December.

The night before Christmas Eve, in other words.

Which — for me — pretty irrelevant.

It still means that — after dinner — I have time to watch a movie.

I’ve a pretty good idea of what I want to watch … but will let what I’ve seen — and what I though of it — tomorrow night.

Once I’ve watched it!

~≈🗡️≈~

Thursday, 23 December 2021

No Time to Die — A Review

22nd December, 2021.






I’ll be frank: I made that introductory video, yesterday.

When, indeed, I’d had homemade spaghetti bolognese.

Although I don’t think anyone who’s genuinely  Italian would know what they’re looking at!

Tonight, on the other hand?

I had fish and chips.   Just to be different.

The intention’s much the same.

Have something to eat, then watch a movie … and then tell you about it: tomorrow night, at the latest.

Now, if you’ll excuse me?

I’m going to take the teabag out of the mug and watch No Time To Die.


~≈M≈~

Tuesday, 2 March 2021

Nik Nak’s Daily Teaser — 2nd March, 2021.

2nd March, 2021.






It’s Tuesday … 

And, frankly?

I’m expecting a call from my GP, later.

I’m half expecting to hear about a potential covid vaccination.

But also to discuss my health.

Which is always worrying.

I’m diabetic: and one always hears horror stories …

~≈🧟≈~

It’s still Tuesday … 

And the UK’s Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rishi Sunak, will be issuing this years’s budget, tomorrow.

I’m not expecting much.

Although I’m hoping that the £20 uplift to Universal Credit* — introduced last year — will be made permanent.

From the little I’ve heard … ?

It’s possibly only going to be extended for six months.

Just long enough to be around for the local elections in May.

But not long enough to pay for Christmas.

Heigh … ho … 

~≈💰≈~

Sunday, 23 February 2020

Knives Out — A Review.

22nd February, 2020.


It has to be said: I think I spent too much of my youth watching The Young Ones.

The anarchic early eighties comedy series: rather than the Cliff Richards movie.

Which sort of explains my ‘Movies, movies, movies,’ opening.

I was aiming for Vyvian … 


Hmmm … 

It’s possibly fallen flat‡, hasn’t it … ?

~≈†≈~

At any rate … ?

I’ve a spare Saturday night … 

One that I fancied spending with a movie.

And, if you’ve spent time reading this morning’s Teaser*, you’ll realise both Debbi and Olga had suggested one Daniel Craig movie in particular.

Yep … 

Knives Out … 

~≈†≈~

Saturday, 7 November 2015

SPECTRE: James Bond Goes Hmmm … 

*SPOILERS*

You get earworms, don’t you … ?

You know, a song that plays its way around your head.

THAT’S an earworm.

Right now?

The tune in my head is this one … 


The familiar James Bond them music originally used as the theme for Dr No, back in 1962, and used, in some way, shape or form, ever since.

The reason I’ve got it worming it’s way through my head?

Is because I and my two sisters, Anna and Ruth?

Went to see the latest theatrical James Bond release, SPECTRE.

While I know Anna and Ruth are possibly going to disagree with me?

I think an appreciative — but not necessarily enthusiastic — “Hmm” noise is the best description.

~≈Ê≈~

Thursday, 21 February 2013

Skyfall: Bond’s Birthday Bash …

It has to be said, sometimes.

That anniversaries can be a lot of hot air.

No, really … !

I spent last night, watching Skyfall, Eon Productions’ latest entry into their James Bond franchise: the 23rd film in the series had a cinematic release that heavily trumpeted the fact it was the 50th year since the release of the original film, Dr No.

Hmm … 

This possbly sounds like I’m going to tell you about a film I’ve seen and how I’ve possibly not enjoyed it it.

Not quite.

Hmmm …  let me try and tell you about Skyfall … 

~≈M≈~

Tuesday, 20 December 2011

Cowboys and Aliens: Entertaining Hokum, Take Two


Wowsa … !



Now, I know what Grub’s and Kevin D are going to say.

That I’m WAY too easily impressed.

They’re — possibly — right.


But right at the moment … ?

I’m really not TOO worried.

You see, I’ve just had a quiet night to meself, to catch the Jon Favreau directed, recent DVD release, Cowboys and Aliens, and I’m DECIDEDLY impressed.

»»·««

No, seriously … !

The 2011 Cowboys and Aliens sees Daniel Craig as the initially unnamed Jake Lonergan, waking up in the middle of the Arizona badlands: with no memory of why, and a strange metal band tightly bound to his wrist.

And, not long after seeing off some bandits? Events see Jake arriving at the small town of Absolution: a town dominated by the paid hands of cattleman, Woodrow Dolerhyde — Harrison Ford — and helping to see off kidnappings committed by SOMETHING tht pays a violent visit in the night …

Given this film’s title … ?

I shouldn’t have to tell you exactly WHAT those visitors, are, now, DO I … ?

««·»»

At any rate, I was burbling on about being impressed by Cowboys and Aliens?

Yes, I’m certainly that … !

And while I am thinking it’s complete hokum — actually, make that complete and utter hokum, with possibly a dash or two of total piffle thrown in for good measure — Cowboys and Aliens is also a pretty entertaining piece of movie, at that.

Certainly more entertaining than the LAST film I called hokum … !

Personally … ?

Personally, I’m going to leave you with the trailer …

AND the proverbial stars on the doors.

And what’s more … ?

Thoroughly recommend Cowboys and Aliens to you. Trust me, it’s a lot more serious than the title implies …
Cowboys and Aliens
★★★☆

Tuesday, 7 April 2009

Quantum of Solace: A Measure of Peace, for a Penny

I’ve got to admit, Adrian does manage to work the library system; he manage to get hold of Quantum of Solace, Daniel Craig’s second screen performance as James Bond.
And it’s definitely one to watch.
It doesn’t necessarily add anything new to the series, which Casino Royale — by going back to the novel, as far as possible whilst keeping the story as modern as possible — did, but Quantum of Solace does keep to the darker feel brought to the franchise by its immediate predecessor. Saying that, it does have its lighter moments.
It’s not one of the bouncier Roger Moore entries, though, by any stretch of the imagination: more Goldfinger than Octopussy. And decidedly darker than most.
But possibly a touch lighter than its predecessor.
There’s a scene at the end, where Bond confronts Vesper’s former lover that got my attention: sympathetic to the young woman involved, promising nastiness to the ex-lover, and reaffirming Bond’s loyalty both to the service and to M.
And, given the body count of the film, one that both remind us how potentially violent Bond is, and how he can be capable, not of forgiveness, but of restraint.
It’s also a film that shows us exactly how murky the underworld of the world’s intelligence agencies are; one of the sub-plot’s shows us how the CIA is prepared to do something of a very pragmatic deal with Dominic Greene, the villain of the piece: with only Felix Leiter – played again, by Jeffrey Wright – as the Agency’s conscience, and an informal ally of Bond.
One thing it does do is offer another twist on the Bond Girl, by giving us Olga Kurylenko as the revenge driven Camille Montes. While she’s no Vesper, she’s also not a traditional Bond ‘Good Girl’: one that ends up in bed with him, in other words. It’s a nice change, actually.
And, while we’re talking of changes, that’s something that hasn’t.
Or maybe I should quote Quark’s last line, in tonight’s final episode of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine.
“The more things change, the more they stay the same…”.
Something I noticed is Quantum of Solace’s introduction of Quantum, the shadowy organisation that Dominic Greene — played by French actor, Mathias Amalric — is a major figure in.
I’m sort of pleased about this.
One thing that I think does help in a Bond film is a nice big Evil Empire to fight against. In the original Bond novels and films, Bond had both SMERSH and SPECTRE to contend with: something that, these days, Eon Productions can’t use, as the Cold War has … thawed … to say the least.
But, in the two Craig fronted movies, Eon feel they need a replacement.
After all, in the novel of Casino Royale it’s a SMERSH agent, not the character of Mr White, that shoots Le Chiffre.
Which means they needed something to explain what’s going on.
So it’s nice to see the introduction of an old plot element, in new clothes, and viewed through a pair of blood tainted spectacles in order to keep the deep gore-covered feel that the Daniel Craig fronted members of the franchise are aiming for.
And, although Adrian has a point – that it would have been very interesting to see a really retro* Bond film – it’s good, from where I’m sitting, to see how the Bond movie franchise evolves.
Whatever one thinks of it, the films and the original Fleming novels, have gone very different ways, after all.

CAST

Actor

Character

Daniel Craig

James Bond

Olga Kurylenko

Camille Montes

Mathis Amalric

Dominic Greene

Judi Dench

M

Giancarlo Gianini

Réne Mathis

* That’s actually a point; we should maybe dig up the recent Bond novel by Sebastian Faulkes, 2008’s “Devil May Care”. Could be something to read.
Apparently, one of the characters is called Scarlett Papaver.
Deary, deary me …

Tuesday, 31 March 2009

Casino Royale: You know My Name …


Phew; A mid-week movie night … !

And what a movie to have …

As you know, by now, something of a cheap night in for me, Adrian, Paul and/or Allison – and whoever else would care to join us – is catching a film on DVD.

There’s advantages to this over a cinema trip, although that’s nice.

It is cheaper: and those of us who smoke, can of course smoke indoors …

Which is possibly beside the point,

At Any rate, tonight’s film was the 2006 EON Productions version of Casino Royale.

Which is a bit special, to say the least.

For a start?   It has more than a grain of the the original Ian Fleming plotlineº to it.

Considerably more than many other of the Eon movies, from what I’m given to understand.

I should know; it’s one of the few of the Fleming originals I’ve read.

There’s minor updates to the plot: the world has moved on since the late 1950s, when the novel was published*.

But, essentially, what one sees on screen is justified by what’s in the text.

Making this a rare Bond film, sharing that distinction with – to the best of my knowledge – only a few of the earlier entries in the franchise; most notably On Her Majesty’s Secret Service.  

The Bond with the one and only appearance of George Lazenby in the central rôle, in case you’d forgotten.

The other reason I mention the latter, is it does share some similarities, although I feel these may be minimal.   The big one – something I’m sure many will know by now – is that, in both movies, there’s a doomed love interest.   The other worth mentioning, is the look and feel.

Both Casino Royale and On Her Majesty’s Secret Service have a gritty feel to them, although that’s more noticeable with Casino.

A sign of the times, I think, and one that, to me is welcome.   It reminds us of exactly what James Bond is;  a well educated, intelligent, well-educated killer.

Charming, capable of hurt, possessing a tender side.

But a killer, none the less

We tend to forget that, given most Bond movies lighter touches.

But, none the less, Casino Royale is exactly that: a Bond film, one that show us the darker, edgier side to the character, and that strips out the conventional formula parts that we’ve been used to, in order to wind the clock back, and breathe life into the franchise.

Complete with the tradition chases – a fun to watch Freerunning sequence – gadgets – although these are kept to the bare minimum, and there’s no Q to hand them over – and one hell of a car crash.

I can’t believe they did that to a DB12!

And the familiar “My names Bond … James Bond” is used right at the very end.

An ending that left Adrian, Paul, and I wanting to see Quantum of Solace …








* And I should add, since the making of the 1954 TV version, and the 1967 film with David Niven.

º Don’t even ask about The Man With The Golden Gun.   There’s a certain character in the film, who’s definitely NOT in the book …