Showing posts with label Günter Grass. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Günter Grass. Show all posts

Wednesday, 16 October 2019

Nik Nak’s Daily Teaser — 16th October, 2019.

16th October, 2019.


It’s officially official: I’v had good news.

On one front … ?

I’ve been approved for monetisation on YouTube.


In other words, I’ve been my Youtube Partner Programme membership’s been approved: and — once my ad revenue hits £60 — I can start earning cash.

Here’s hoping.

~≈≈~

In other good news?

I had a CT scan on my lungs this year: in July, if I’m remembering things correctly.

As an earlier one had revealed nodules: the doctor would be concerned: if these had grown in size or number.

I get the results letter, yesterday.

The nodules … haven’t grown.

I am extremely relieved.

As, for the moment, it means I’m free of what could have been lung cancer.

I’m relieved, understandably.

And frankly?

Thanking whatever higher powers are reading this!

~≈⨂≈~

Just as one last thing, before I move on to the Teaser?

I don’t know if you were following the Queen’s Speech, recently … ?

I had half an eye on it, I should add.

One policy that caught the attention of many?   Was the Government plans for photographic ID to be required, when we vote.

That’s still not something I could support.

Mostly?

Because, every time the idea is mentioned, the usual forms of ID are mentioned.

A passport or drivers license.

These things cost.

And are — if you’re unemployed, like me — completely unaffordable: the £75 to £85 for an adult UK passport pays for my gas and electricity, to give you and example.

The £43 for a new, provisional drivers license?   Half my shopping for the month.

It’s £20 for a replacement provisional license: something I was only able to purchase with help from the Job Centre.

I needed it to provide photographic ID for a job interview.

Help I suspect the Job Centre wouldn’t give me, or others … if I needed photographic ID to vote.

I know the idea is to help reduce voting fraud … 

But?

The impression I’ve always picked up — over the years — is that a lot of voting fraud centres around postal fraud.   I don’t see photographic ID being helpful, there.

Given all that?

I can’t support this.

But can, at least, sign the petition about it.


~≈⨂≈~