Thursday, 19 January 2012

Contagion: Harum, Scarum, and meaningfully art-house bacteria … 


19th January, 2012.

Well …

THAT’S a thing … !

Well …

Actually, it’s possibly several things, including things that actually AREN’T things.

Which is possibly a phrase designed to give a philosopher a headache, I know that …

Let’s get moving on to what I WANT to talk about, shall … ?

»»·««

Yes, let’s … !

Now, I’ve got to admit I’ve had a quiet patch or two, recently, what with one thing and another.

But … ?

Well, the local library being as good as it is with film rentals, you DO get a hankering for something a touch different.

I do, certainly.

Especially after having seen the VERY entertaining Reign of Fire, the other night: I fancied something a touch slower paced, and managed to bag the 2011, Steven Soderbergh film, Contagion.

And, yes, before you ask: Contagion and Reign of Fire are as different as chalk and cheese*.

»»·««

The recent DVD release that is Contagion has a very quiet beginning: as it sees travelling business woman, Beth Emhoff — Gwyneth Paltrow, in what has to be one the SHORTEST appearances she’d made in a film — coming back from a trip to Hong Kong.

And dying — ten minutes into the film — of a mysterious virus she’s picked up, whilst travelling.

Which is the where Soderbergh’s ensemble cast takes: with various researchers — from the Centre for Disease Control in the US and the World Health Organisation — struggling to both trace the virus to its source, AND to come up with a vaccine.

»»·««

Now … ?

Am I impressed/grabbed/blown awayº … ?

Hmmm …

I’m not sure I could say as much: especially as I found Reign of Fire a touch pacier, and more entertaining.

However … ?

Contagion is a much more thoughtful kind of movie: and one that’s riveting in it’s very quiet understatement of world disaster.

Here …

I’ll leave you to think this over, shall I … ?

Contagion
★★★☆








* I sort of like the idea of avoiding cliques, when it’s possible. Sometimes, though … ? Sometimes, when you’re rooting through the toolbox of communication, an old fashioned hammer and nails are your best bets. And yes … these are two very different films …

º Why IS there only one word for Thesaurus^ … ? Nina … ? Debbi … ? Trevor … ?

^ More the point, why IS ‘dyslexia’ so hard to spell … ? And WHY, when you’re not sure of a word’s spelling, do you look in a dictionary: a book that relies on you knowing how to spell the word you don’t how to spell … in order to check on the spelling …
Mad … ?
 We WILL be, in next week’s exciting episode …!

No comments:

Post a Comment

I love it when people comment. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?

I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.

Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively adult. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.

Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.

If you can also leave you comments on today’s Teaser Video, that would be good.

Thank you.

*   I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.

†   Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable: as are Bluesky or Mastodon links. I also like seeing folks webpages.