Saturday, 24 April 2010

Back and forth


Oh, now, hang on, that’s so unfair









Tonight’s stunner of a Dr Who is the first half of two!

It’s a ‘To Be Continued’!!

Don’t you just hate that … ?

But I will say this: Smith, Gillan and Moffat have pulled a stonker out of the hat!!

Along with some returning old friends … !

Because tonights’s episode, The Time of Angels, is even better than last week’s Victory of the Daleks.

It sees the Doctor summoned by his future wife/widow* Doctor — at this stage in her life — River Songº.

To the wreck of a ship called the Byzantium.

A wreck with something else in the hold that the Doctor’s met in a previous life …

A Weeping Angel.

And there’s a very good suggestion that the Angel’s up to something more than just sitting in the hold, waiting for the right moment to scare someone … !

Actually, the major scare in tonight’s episode is where Amy is confronted by a video clip of the Weeping Angel in the Byzantium’s cargo hold.

A video clip!

Ever been scared that the hideous horrible thing on the TV screen is going to come and get you?

Well … ?

Have you?

Well …

That’s was a heck of a thing … !

I thing Stephen Moffat’s just hit his stride: the Weeping Angels are his babies, if anyone’s.

And I think we’ve something of a classic, here …

Let’s hope Flesh and Stone carries it on.





























* Douglas Adams was right: time travel does play havoc with grammar

º Played, as in the Silence in the Library two-parter, by the returning Alex Kingston. And with a great deal of relish, as well.

ª Anybody mentioning Kevin the Teenager will be given a meaningful Look … !

1 comment:

  1. Hi there,
    Personally I would say that Weeping Angels was one of the best episodes of this series.

    You have mentioned the part where Amy Pond looked at the screen, I would say that this was fantastic in the way the Weeping Angel appeared on the screen.

    Everything you have wrote was correct and brilliant.

    ReplyDelete

I love it when people comment. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?

I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.

Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively adult. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.

Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.

If you can also leave you comments on today’s Teaser Video, that would be good.

Thank you.

*   I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.

†   Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable: as are Bluesky or Mastodon links. I also like seeing folks webpages.