Wednesday, 11 August 2010

Charlie Wilson’s War: Sex and Drugs and Mujahideen … 

You know, I think I’ve had an entertaining evening …

Think … ?

No, I’m positive I did … !

Now, as you’ve probably guessed, every so often I and some friends usually get together to catch a DVD.

To the point where I’m thinking that I should maybe start calling these little get-togethers a salon

Or maybe not: I think those had more French people involved, didn’t they … ?

Kevin, Adrian … ?

At any rate, you’d’ve worked out, by now, that Kevin D, Movie Night Adrian and I — joined, tonight by Kay and her partner, Rob — were all at mine, for a film.

Tonight’s … ?

Was the 2007, Mike Nichols directed film, Charlie Wilson’s War.

And, at the risk of sounding even more stumped than a very stumped person indeed, I’ve got to admit, I’m blowed if I know where to put Charlie Wilson’s War, genre-wise.

I really don’t …

Because, whilst it’s a biopic of Representative Charles Wilson’s efforts to fund a covert operation to repel the USSR from Afghanistan, it’s also a very wry piece of comedy.

With extra wryness.

And maybe a mild Satire sauce …

The film follows Representative Wilson — party guy and all round Good Ol’ Texan womaniser — on his own personal road to Damascus.

After he sees a news article on Afghan refugees fleeing their homeland in the aftermath of the Soviet invasion, he becomes determined to try and help.

Mostly, as a member of the relevant sub-commitees, by making sure that the various mujahadeen groups in the region getting both arms and funding: mostly through General Zia-ul-Haq.

‹‹‹•›››

Now, others have summed up both the film and the events it shows us.

But Charlie Wilson’s War … ?

I think I’m going to recommend this one to you.

It’s a film that, although showing us events that have been endless discussed, it does so with a sense of humour that I found keep all of us laughing out loud.

Several times.

And, in one of its closing scenes, shows Wilson asking the relevant sub-commitee why they’re only fund an Afghan school to the tune of $1, 000, 000.

When they’ve spent $100, 000, 000 on the covert war …

There’s probably a lot a body could make of that, isn’t there … ?

Several people have.

But all I can do is quote you the congressman, himself …

“These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world …
and then we fucked up the end game.”






1 comment:

  1. The overall result was depressing, but I do enjoy watching Tom Hanks in action for several hours! Even playing a southern rake!

    ReplyDelete

I love it when people comment. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?

I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.

Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively adult. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.

Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.

If you can also leave you comments on today’s Teaser Video, that would be good.

Thank you.

*   I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.

†   Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable: as are Bluesky or Mastodon links. I also like seeing folks webpages.