Tuesday, 26 January 2016

Howl: The Return of the Little Indie Direct to Video Brit Flick

26th January, 2016.

OK, I think I’ve had a little success, today.

Really.

Remember I told you — a few days ago, now — I was trying to sell off my sister’s old laptop?

I managed to do so, today.

Picking up a tidy sum, in return.

My sister, Ruth, got her share: I got a fish supper and a movie.

Didn’t I just … ?

The film in question?   Was the straight to video 2015, Paul Hyett directed, Neil Marshall penned, Howl.

And ‘straight to video’ … ?   Isn’t necessarily bad.

~≈Â≈~

Starting at Waterloo Station, Howl introduces us to Joe (Ed Speleer): a train guard just about to clock on to a late shift.

A late shift with unrequited love, Ellen (Holly Weston), the girl in charge of the tea trolley … 

On an overnight train that’s been delayed, and hits a forested wild part of Britain, at midnight, under a full moon, with a bunch of the snottiest passengers that one could hope to meet.

The fact the driver, Tony — Sean Pertwee, in one of his shortest appearances — ends up getting out of the train to see what it’s run over … ?

And … well … 

You can tell the journey’s facing issues, can’t you … ?

And not just a shortage of wet-wipes.

~≈Â≈~

Now … 

You’re possibly wondering two things, aren’t you?   You’re wondering exactly what I meant by ‘straight to video’ not necessarily being bad?

And whether Howl was any good?

Yes: Howl’s a good film.

It’s not got the biggest budget, most of the cast are unknowns, and it’s only Paul Hyett’s third film as director: he’s previously done time as prosthetic effects designer and builder on various films.   Including some for Neil Marshall, co-writer and director of Dog Soldier.

For all that … ?

Cast, director and crew have knocked out a low budget film that is short, sweet, well paced, and very watchable.

Yes, it’s gone straight to video: which, only a few years ago, would have been the biggest insult in cinema.

But with this?

I think the idea pays off: it gives Hyett a chance to learn the job of director, cast and crew a chance to pay bills and be seen, and the writers a chance to test out ideas.

AND gives us a watchable film at a reasonable cost.

Personally?

I think they’ve made a film that isn’t artistically meaningful, replete with answers for trying philosophical questions.

No.

They HAVE made for an entertaining film: one that’s provided me with a good night’s viewing, and that will do the same for you.

Howl.
★★☆☆

No comments:

Post a Comment

I love it when people comment. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?

I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.

Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively adult. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.

Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.

If you can also leave you comments on today’s Teaser Video, that would be good.

Thank you.

*   I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.

†   Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable: as are Bluesky or Mastodon links. I also like seeing folks webpages.