Wednesday, 25 September 2013

The Brentwood Gazette’s Weekly Teaser — 25-9-2013: The US Constitution

Well, it’s official.

Snooker player, Stephen Lee has been given a lifetime ban — and £40, 000 fine — for match fixing.

Which isn’t necessarily something a fan wants to see.

Match fixing, I should add, there.

It’s a shame a such talented player has been involved with it.

Although as a long term fan of a game that’s long had rumours and allegations have floated around for years I have to add, I wonder how much more of it’s going on.

At ANY rate … ?

At any rate, it’s Wednesday: which means it’s time for the Brentwood Gazette’s Weekly Teaser: all about the US Constitution, and covered by the usual Creative Commons License*.

Here’s this week’s questions …
Q1) 25th September, 1789, saw the US government pass the first 12 amendments to the Constitution; how many of these make up what’s known as the Bill of Rights?
Q2) The US Constitution opens with the line, “We, The People …”: of where … ?
Q3) ‘Article the First’ of the amendments was never formally ratified and was supposed to guarantee one representative for, at most, how many people: thirty thousand, forty thousand or fifty thousand … ?
Q4) Another of those twelve amendments was the one that forbade congressional pay raises until the start of the next term of office.  That eventually became which amendment: the twenty-fifth, twenty-sixth or twenty-seventh … ?
Q5) The First Amendment forbade the USA from adopting what: a state military, state religion or US navy … ?
Q6) The 3rd Amendment to the Constitution guarantees protection from what … ?
Q7) Which amendment guarantees the right to a trial by jury: the fifth, sixth or seventh … ?
Q8) Many US citizens tell you they have a right bear arms: which Amendment guarantees this … ?
Q9) Which Amendment guarantees freedom of speech in the US … ?
Q10) Finally … Which of the Amendments means a US citizen can’t incriminate himself: the Third, Fourth or Fifth … ?
And here’s last weeks questions and answers …
Questions.
Q1) 18th September saw Tiberius confirmed as Roman Emperor.   By which Roman body … ?
Q2) In which year did that body finally collapse: 603, 604 or 605 AD … ?
Q3) Was Tiberius the second, third or fourth Roman Emperor … ?
Q4) Who was his predecessor in the post … ?
Q5) Many Roman Emperors were called ‘Princeps’.   Which meant what:  prince, first or noble  … ?
Q6) The word ‘Emperor’ comes from the Latin word ‘Imperator’, which (roughly) meant what: duke, commander or king … ?
Q7) Another title used by Tiberius was ‘Pontifex Maximus’, or ‘High Priest’.   Who is that title usually applied to, in modern times … ?
Q8) How many legions would Tiberius have inherited from his predecessor: twenty-five, twenty-eight or thirty-one … ?
Q9) More to the point, how many troops were in each legion: 3000, 4000 or 5000 … ?
Q10) Finally … Who was Tiberius’ successor as Emperor … ?
Answers.
A1) The Roman Senate.
A2) 603.
A3) Second.
A4) Augustus.
A5) ‘First’: as in First Citizen, or ‘First amongst equals’: or even ‘First Amongst the Senate’, which would’ve been one of the specific titles Augustus used.
A6) Commander.
A7) The Pope.
A8) Twenty-five. (25).   (Augustus had reorganized the Roman army into twenty-eight legions: three of which he’d promptly lost in the Battle of Teutoberg Forest.)
A9) 5000.
A10) His grand-nephew, Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus Germanicus: also called Little Boots, or, in Latin, Caligula.
Enjoy those.









*        Regulars will know already, but for newcomers … all it means is that you’re free to copy, use, alter and build on each of my quizzes: including the Teasers, Gazette Teasers and the Friday Question Sets.   All I ask in return is that you give me an original authors credit on your event’s flyers or posters, or on the night: and, if you republish them, give me an original authors credit AND republish under the same license.   A link back to the site would be appreciated.

No comments:

Post a Comment

I love it when people comment. But, having had anonymous comments I feel may be libellous, actionable or just plain offensive, over the years?

I’d appreciate you* leaving your name — with a link to your website or social-media profile†, for preference — before you post a comment.

Should you choose to use a pseudonym/name, I’d appreciate it if that name were to be polite and inoffensive. I’d rather you kept it clean, and relatively adult. Comments left with a pseudonym will be posted at my discretion: I really prefer a link.

Contentious, actionable or abusive posts left anonymously will not be posted. Nor will comments using offensive pseudonyms or language, or that are abusive of other commenters.

If you can also leave you comments on today’s Teaser Video, that would be good.

Thank you.

*   I know many value their online privacy. I respect that. But hope you respect my wish to see who’s commenting on my blog: and my wish for you to introduce your self to me, and to your fellow commentors.

†   Your Facebook, X/Twitter, Blogger, Instagram, TikTok or LinkedIn profile are acceptable: as are Bluesky or Mastodon links. I also like seeing folks webpages.