28th January, 2021.
Busy, busy, busy …
I’m expecting a couple of phone calls, today: one form my GP, and another from a weight management programme I’m on.
Hopefully?
Both will go well.
~≈¥≈~
You’ll possibly have realised I’m out of work: and on Universal Credit.
Like others? I’m getting an extra twenty pounds a week: as a result of an uplift the Government introduced, to help survive COVID-19.
It’s due to end in April.
And many in the Government are discussing what should happens.
There’s been talk of replacing the uplift with a one-off £500 payment: or a £1000 one.
Which are nice: but not as useful as the twenty pound payment.
So … ?
So, seeing
this piece on the Wales Online site was interesting.
Seemingly?
Chancellor Rishi Sunak is planning to extend the uplift for six months.
Then taper it off.
Again, that’s helpful: frankly, it’s my preferred option of the three I’ve seen discussed.
But, frankly?
I’d far rather the payment were permanent.
~≈¥≈~
As a result of all this … ?
Old Peculiar regular,
Olga, and I have been chatting about the idea of a
Universal Basic Income: a flat Rate benefit that every one would get: regardless of their employment status.
It’s a nice ideal … but, as someone who’s always had issues with his benefits?
I’m very aware that the amount we receive is only half the problem.
The BIG issue, if you lose your job? Or a benefit changes?
Is the delay in receiving a new benefit.
There’s always a delay which causes arrears to build up: arrears that cause problems.
If you can keep ahead of those, you’re fine: but the guaranteed delays means you can’t.
(Universal Credit’s paid monthly: unlike Job Seekers Allowance, which was paid fortnightly. JSA took two to three weeks for the first payment. UC caused more problems, and had more opposition, because it took up to six weeks for the first payment.)
After Olga and I chatted recently about UBI? I was left feeling more convinced it could be just as iffy as Universal Credit: the change from one to the other would cause the same issues, as it had the same delays.
So I had something of a sniff around the various UK political parties 2019 manifestos.
The Tories seemed keen to keep Universal Credit.
Labour were only going to announce any changes after an election win.
The Liberal Democrats? Were planning to change to a UBI, but didn’t announce any figures.
The Greens — who I’ve been voting for since 2017 — were planing to introduce one.
And, in their 2019 manifesto?
Say:
“People who were reliant on Housing Benefit before UBI was introduced will continue to receive it, so that they can cover their rent.”
I’ve highlighted this to Paul Jeater, one of the senior Green figures.
The manifesto seems to say that anyone now on Housing Benefit will still get it.
The problem, there? Is simply that anyone who’s on Universal Credit doesn’t get Housing Benefit.
Oh, I grant: we get what’s called Universal Credit’s Housing Component.
But not Housing Benefit.
The Component’s replaced Housing Benefit: in my case, four years ago.
Everyone else I know getting UC is getting the same Housing Component.
Effectively, we’re not getting Housing Benefit: we’re getting a larger Universal Credit payment, to help cover our rent.
As things stand?
The manifesto tells me the UC housing component will get removed: and not be replaced.
Much as I’m happy to support the Greens locally? And was happy to support them in the 2019 General Election?
Much as I’m happy to support them locally?
I don’t think I can support them nationally, unless their position changes changes.